The “saddle” is a sudden, sustained, and deep drop in sales of a new product, after a period of rapid growth following takeoff, followed by a gradual recovery to the former peak. The authors test for the generalizability of the saddle across products and countries and for three rival explanations: chasms in adopter segments, business cycles, and technological cycles. They model both boundary points of the saddle—start of the sales drop and recovery to the initial peak—using split-population models. Empirical analysis of historical sales data from ten products across 19 countries shows that the saddle is fairly pervasive. The onset of the saddle occurs in 148 product–country combinations. On average, the saddle occurs nine years after takeoff, at a mean penetration of 30%, and it lasts for eight years with a 29% drop in sales at its depth. The results support explanations of chasms and technological cycles for information/entertainment products and business cycles and technological cycles for kitchen/laundry products. The authors conclude with a discussion of the findings, contributions, and implications.
AgarwalRajshree, and BayusBarry L. (2002), “The Market Evolution and Sales Takeoff of Product Innovations,”Management Science, 48(8), 1024–1041.
2.
AhujaGautam, and KatilaRiitta (2001), “Technological Acquisitions and the Innovation Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Longitudinal Study,”Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220.
3.
AllisonPaul D. (1982), “Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event History Data,” in Sociological Methodology, LeinhardtS., ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 61–98.
4.
AllisonPaul D. (1995), Survival Analysis Using SAS: A Practical Guide.Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
5.
BalcerYves, Lippman and StevenA. (1984), “Technological Expectations and Adoption of Improved Technology,”Journal of Economic Theory, 34(2), 292–318.
6.
BassFrank M. (1969), “A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables,”Management Science, 15(5), 215–27.
7.
ChandrasekaranDeepa, and TellisGerard J. (2007), “A Critical Review of Marketing Research on Diffusion of New Products,” in Review of Marketing Research, Vol. 3, MalhotraNaresh K., ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 39–80.
8.
ChandrasekaranDeepa, and TellisGerard J. (2008), “Global Takeoff of New Products: Culture, Wealth, or Vanishing Differences?”Marketing Science, 27(5), 844–60.
9.
ChandyRajesh, HopstakenBrigitte, NarasimhanOm, and PrabhuJaideep (2006), “From Invention to Innovation: Conversion Ability in Product Development,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43(August), 494–508.
10.
DeleersnyderBarbara, DekimpeMarnik G., SarvaryMiklos, and ParkerPhilip (2004), “Weathering Tight Economic Cycles: The Sales Evolution of Consumer Durables Over the Business Cycle,”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2(4), 347–83.
11.
DeleersnyderBarbara, DekimpeMarnik G., SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., and LeeflangPeter S.H. (2009), “The Role of National Culture in Advertising's Sensitivity to Business Cycles: An Investigation across Continents,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46(October), 623–36.
12.
DoylePeter, and SaundersJohn (1985), “The Lead Effect of Marketing Decisions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 22(January), 54–65.
13.
GaneshJaishankar, and KumarV. (1996), “Capturing the Cross-National Learning Effect: An Analysis of an Industrial Technology Diffusion,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4), 328–37.
14.
GoldenbergJacob, LibaiBarak, and MullerEitan (2002), “Riding the Saddle: How Cross-Market Communications Can Create a Major Slump in Sales,”Journal of Marketing, 66(April), 1–16.
15.
GoldenbergJacob, LibaiBarak, MullerEitan, and PeresRenana (2006), “Blazing Saddles: The Early and Mainstream Markets in the High-Tech Product Life Cycle,”Israel Economic Review, 4(2), 85–108.
16.
GolderPeter N., and TellisGerard J. (1997), “Will It Ever Fly? Modeling the Takeoff of Really New Consumer Durables,”Marketing Science, 16(3), 256–70.
17.
GolderPeter N., and TellisGerard J. (1998), “Beyond Diffusion: An Affordability Model of the Growth of New Consumer Durables,”Journal of Forecasting, 17(3/4), 259–80.
18.
GolderPeter N., and TellisGerard J. (2004), “Going, Going, Gone: Cascades, Diffusion, and Turning Points of the Product Life Cycle,”Marketing Science, 23(2), 207–218.
19.
HauserJohn, TellisGerard J., and GriffinAbbie (2006), “Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science,”Marketing Science, 25(6), 687–717.
20.
HodrickRobert J., and PrescottEdward C. (1997), “Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation,”Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29(1), 1–16.
21.
HolakSusan L., LehmannDonald R., and SultanFareena (1987), “The Role of Expectations in the Adoption of Innovative Consumer Durables: Some Preliminary Evidence,”Journal of Retailing, 63(3), 243–59.
22.
JenkinsStephen P. (1997), “Discrete Time Proportional Hazard Regression,”Stata Technical Bulletin, 7(39), 22–32.
JohnGeorge, WeissAllen M., and DuttaShantanu (1999), “Marketing in Technology-Intensive Markets: Toward a Conceptual Framework,”Journal of Marketing, 63(special issue), 78–91.
25.
KumarV., GaneshJaishankar, and EchambadiRaj (1998), “Cross National Diffusion Research: What Do We Know And How Certain Are We?”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(3), 255–68.
26.
LameyLien, DeleersnyderBarbara, DekimpeMarnik G., and SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. (2007), “How Business Cycles Contribute to Private-Label Success: Evidence from the United States and Europe,”Journal of Marketing, 71(January), 1–15.
27.
LibaiBarak, MullerEitan, and PeresRenana (2009a), “The Diffusion of Services,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46(February), 163–75.
28.
LibaiBarak, MullerEitan, and PeresRenana (2009b), “The Role of Within-Brand and Cross-brand Communications in Competitive Growth,”Journal of Marketing, 73(May), 19–34.
29.
MahajanVijay, and MullerEitan (1998), “When Is It Worthwhile Targeting the Majority Instead of the Innovators in a New Product Launch?”Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (November), 488–95.
30.
MahajanVijay, MullerEitan, and SrivastavaRajendra K. (1990), “Determination of Adopter Products by Using Innovation Diffusion Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 27(February), 37–50.
31.
MascarenhasBriance, and AakerDavid A. (1989), “Strategy over the Business Cycle,”Strategic Management Journal, 10(3), 199–210.
32.
MooreGeoffrey A. (1991), Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Technology Products to Mainstream Customers.New York: HarperCollins.
33.
MullerEitan, and YogevGuy (2006), “When Does the Majority Become a Majority? Empirical Analysis of the Time at Which Main Market Adopters Purchase the Bulk of Our Sales,”Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(10), 1107–1120.
34.
PrinsRemco, and VerhoefPeter C. (2007), “Marketing Communication Drivers of Adoption Timing of a New E-Service Among Existing Customers,”Journal of Marketing, 71(April), 169–83.
35.
PutsisWilliam P.Jr., BalasubramanianSridhar, KaplanEdward H., and SenSubrata (1997), “Mixing Behavior in Cross-Country Diffusion,”Marketing Science, 16(4), 354–69.
36.
RogersEverett (1995), Diffusion of Innovations.New York: The Free Press.
37.
SawyerAlan G., and Paul PeterJ. (1983), “The Significance of Statistical Significance Tests in Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 20(May), 122–33.
38.
SchmidtPeter, and WitteAnn D. (1989), “Predicting Criminal Recidivism Using ‘Split Population’ Survival Time Models,”Journal of Econometrics, 40(1), 141–59.
39.
SingerJudith D., and WilletJohn B. (1993), “It's About Time: Using Discrete-Time Survival Analysis to Study Duration and the Timing of Events,”Journal of Educational Statistics, 18(2), 155–95.
40.
SingerJudith D., and WilletJohn B. (2003), Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modelling Change and Event Occurrence.New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
SinhaRajiv K., and ChandrashekaranMurali (1992), “A Split Hazard Model for Analyzing the Diffusion of Innovations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 29(February), 116–27.
42.
SrinivasanRaji, LilienGary, and RangaswamyArvind (2006), “The Emergence of Dominant Designs,”Journal of Marketing, 70(April), 1–17.
43.
SrinivasanRaji, RangaswamyArvind, and LilienGary (2005), “Turning Adversity into Advantage: Does Proactive Marketing During a Contraction Pay Off?,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(2), 109–125.
44.
StockJames H., and WatsonMark W. (1999), “Business Cycle Fluctuations in US Macroeconomic Time Series,” in Handbook of Macroeconomics, TaylorJohn, and WoodfordMichael, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V, 3–64
45.
StremerschStefan, and TellisGerard J. (2004), “Understanding and Managing International Growth of New Products,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(4), 421–38
46.
TakadaHirokazu, and JainDipak (1991), “Cross-National Analysis of Diffusion of Consumer Durable Goods in Pacific Rim Countries,”Journal of Marketing, 55(April), 48–54.
47.
TalukdarDebabrata, SudhirK., and AinslieAndrew (2002), “Investigating New Product Diffusion Across Products and Countries,”Marketing Science, 21(1), 97–114.
48.
TellisGerard J., PrabhuJaideep C., and ChandyRajesh K. (2009), “Radical Innovation Across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture,”Journal of Marketing, 73(January), 3–24.
49.
TellisGerard J., StremerschStefan, and YinEden (2003), “The International Takeoff of New Products: The Role of Economics, Culture and Country Innovativeness,”Marketing Science, 22(2), 188–208.
50.
TrajtenbergManuel (1990), “A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations,”The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–87.
51.
Van den BulteChristophe (2000), “New Product Diffusion Acceleration: Measurement and Analysis,”Marketing Science, 19(4), 366–80.
52.
Van den BulteChristophe, and JoshiYogesh V. (2007), “New Product Diffusion with Influentials and Imitators,”Marketing Science, 26(3), 400–21.
53.
EverdingenVan, YvonneM., AghinabWouter B., and FokDennis (2005), “Forecasting Cross-Population Innovation Diffusion: A Bayesian Approach,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(3), 293–308.
54.
WeissAllen M. (1994), “The Effects of Expectations on Technology Adoption: Some Empirical Evidence,”The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(4), 341–60.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
