Embedded premium (EP) promotions promise purchase-contingent donations to a social cause and are typically studied within a single category. However, EP programs spanning multiple product categories and brands are widespread. This research investigates fundamental questions regarding where and to what extent an EP promotion should be used in multicategory contexts. Using experimental choice data from more than 3500 people in two studies, the authors examine multicategory EP programs in two distinct branding environments: spanning a diverse house-of-brands portfolio or covering a multicategory product line that shares a common corporate brand name. For the corporate brand context, the results show that EP effects in one category carry over to adjacent categories that do not have an EP association. Greater multicategory EP prevalence does not enhance brand attractiveness beyond the effect of a single EP exposure. For the house-of-brands context, there is an inverse relationship between brand strength and incremental gain from EP. From a return-on-investment standpoint, EP promotions are more efficient than price promotions because they enhance brand preference and are relatively cheaper to deploy. The results make a strong case for a more discriminating implementation of EP programs across brands and categories.
AakerDavid A., and KellerKevin L. (1990), “Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (January), 27–41.
2.
AinslieAndrew, and RossiPeter E. (1998), “Similarities in Choice Behavior Across Product Categories,”Marketing Science, 17 (2), 91–106.
3.
AndreoniJames (1990), “Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm Glow Giving,”Economic Journal, 100 (401), 464–77.
4.
AroraNeeraj, and HendersonTy (2007), “Embedded Premium Promotion: Why It Works and How to Make It More Effective,”Marketing Science, 26 (4), 514–31.
5.
BagozziRichard P., BaumgartnerHans, and YiYoujae (1992), “Appraisal Processes in the Enactment of Intentions to Use Coupons,”Psychology & Marketing, 9, (6), 469–86.
6.
BaronJonathan (1997), “Biases in the Quantitative Measurement of Values for Public Decisions,”Psychological Bulletin, 122 (1), 72–88.
7.
BaronJonathan, and GreeneJoshua (1996), “Determinants of Insensitivity to Quantity in Valuation of Public Goods: Contribution, Warm Glow, Budget Constraints, Availability, and Prominence,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2 (2), 107–125.
8.
BaronJonathan, and SprancaMark (1997), “Protected Values,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70 (1), 1–16.
9.
BaroneMichael J., MiniardPaul W., and RomeoJean B. (2000), “The Influence of Positive Mood on Brand Extension Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (March), 387–402.
10.
BaroneMichael J., MiyazakiAnthony D., and TaylorKimberly A. (2000), “The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another?”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 248–62.
11.
BaroneMichael J., NormanAndrew T., and MiyazakiAnthony D. (2007), “Consumer Response to Retailer Use of Cause-Related Marketing: Is More Fit Better?”Journal of Retailing, 83 (4), 437–45.
12.
BatsonC. Daniel, DuncanBruce D., AckermanPaula, BuckleyTerese, and BirchKimberly (1981), “Is Empathic Emotion a Source of Altruistic Motivation?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40 (2), 290–302.
13.
BeckerGary S., and MurphyKevin M. (1993), “A Simple Theory of Advertising as a Good or Bad,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (4), 941–64.
14.
BoushDavid M., and LokenBarbara (1991), “A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (February), 16–28.
15.
BrownChristina L., and CarpenterGregory S. (2000), “Why Is the Trivial Important? A Reasons-Based Account for the Effects of Trivial Attributes on Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (March), 372–85.
16.
BrownTom J., and DacinPeter A. (1997), “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses,”Journal of Marketing, 61 (January), 68–84.
17.
CampbellMargaret C., and KellerKevin Lane (2003), “Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (September), 292–304.
18.
CohenJoel B., and BasuKunal (1987), “Alternative Models of Categorization: Toward a Contingent Processing Framework,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (March), 455–72.
19.
CornesRichard, and SandlerTodd (1984), “Easy Riders, Joint Production, and Public Goods,”Economic Journal, 94 (375), 580–98.
20.
DawesRobyn M., and CorriganBernard (1974), “Linear Models in Decision Making,”Psychological Bulletin, 81 (March), 95–106.
21.
DiamondPeter A., and HausmanJerry A. (1994), “Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number?”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (4), 45–64.
22.
DroletAimee, and LuceMary Frances (2004), “The Rationalizing Effects of Cognitive Load on Emotion-Based Trade-Off Avoidance,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (June), 63–77.
23.
ErdemTülin, and SunBaohong (2002), “An Empirical Investigation of the Spillover Effects of Advertising and Sales Promotions in Umbrella Branding,”Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (November), 408–420.
24.
FranklinDaniel (2008), “Just Good Business,”The Economist, (January 19), 2–24.
25.
FreyBruno S., and MeierStephan (2003), “Social Comparisons and Pro-Social Behavior: Testing ‘Conditional Cooperation’ in a Field Experiment,”American Economic Review, 94 (5), 1717–22.
26.
FriedmanMilton (1970), “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,”The New York Times Magazine, (September 13), 32–33.
27.
GigerenzerGerd, and GoldsteinDaniel G. (1996), “Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality,”Psychological Review, 103 (4), 650–69.
28.
GilbrideTimothy J., and AllenbyGreg M. (2004), “A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules,”Marketing Science, 23 (3), 391–406.
29.
GilbrideTimothy J., and AllenbyGreg M. (2006), “Estimating Heterogeneous EBA and Economic Screening Rule Choice Models,”Marketing Science, 25 (5), 494–509.
30.
GroverRajiv, and SrinivasanV. (1992), “Evaluating the Multiple Effects of Retail Promotions on Brand Loyal and Brand Switching Segments,”Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (February), 76–89.
31.
HansenKarsten, SinghVishal, and ChintaguntaPradeep (2006), “Understanding Store-Brand Purchase Behavior Across Categories,”Marketing Science, 25 (1), 75–90.
32.
HauserJohn R., and WernerfeltBirger (1990), “An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (March), 393–408.
33.
HochStephen J., KimByung-Do, MontgomeryAlan L., and RossiPeter E. (1995), “Determinants of Store-Level Price Elasticity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (February), 17–29.
34.
IrwinJulie R., and BaronJonathan (2001), “Response Mode Effects and Moral Values,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84 (2), 177–97.
35.
JedidiKamel, and KohliRajeev (2005), “Probabilistic Subset-Conjunctive Models for Heterogeneous Consumers,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (November), 483–95.
36.
KahnemanDaniel, and KnetschJack L. (1992), “Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction,”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22 (1), 57–95.
37.
KellerKevin Lane (2003), “Brand Synthesis: The Multidimensionality of Brand Knowledge,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (March), 595–600.
38.
KimByung-Do, SrinivasanKannan, and WilcoxRonald T. (1999), “Identifying Price Sensitive Consumers: The Relative Merits of Demographic vs. Purchase Pattern Information,”Journal of Retailing, 75 (2), 173–93.
39.
KotchenMatthew J. (2005), “Impure Public Goods and the Comparative Statics of Environmentally Friendly Consumption,”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49 (2), 281–300.
40.
KrishnaAradhna, and RajanUday (2009), “Cause Marketing: Spillover Effects of Cause-Related Products in a Product Portfolio,”Management Science, 55 (9), 1469–85.
41.
LaneVicki, and JacobsonRobert (1995), “Stock Market Reactions to Brand Extension Announcements: The Effects of Brand Attitude and Familiarity,”Journal of Marketing, 59 (January), 63–77.
42.
LeibensteinHarvey (1950), “Bandwagon, Snob and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64 (2), 183–207.
43.
LokenBarbara, and JohnDeborah Roedder (1993), “Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact?”Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), 71–84.
44.
LuceMary Frances, PayneJohn W., and BettmanJames R. (1999), “Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (May), 143–59.
45.
LuoXueming, and BhattacharyaC.B. (2006), “Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (October), 1–18.
46.
ManchandaPuneet, AnsariAsim, and GuptaSunil (1999), “The ‘Shopping Basket’: A Model for Multicategory Purchase Incidence Decisions,”Marketing Science, 18 (2), 95–114.
47.
McFaddenDaniel (1974), “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour,” in Frontiers in Econometrics, ZarembkaP., ed. New York: Academic Press, 105–142.
48.
MeijerErik, and RouwendalJan (2006), “Measuring Welfare Effects in Models with Random Coefficients,”Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21 (2), 227–44.
49.
MooreDavid J., HarrisWilliam D., and ChenHong C. (1995), “Affect Intensity: An Individual Difference Response to Advertising Appeals,”Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (September), 154–64.
50.
MurphyGregory L. (1988), “Comprehending Complex Concepts,”Cognitive Science, 12 (4), 539–62.
NeslinScott A. (2002), Sales Promotion.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
53.
ParkC. Whan, JunSung Youl, and ShockerAllan D. (1996), “Composite Branding Alliances: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effects,”Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (November), 453–66.
54.
PorterMichael E., and KramerMark R. (2006), “Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility,”Harvard Business Review, 84 (December), 78–92.
55.
RaoVithala R., AgarwalManoj K., and DalhoffDenise (2004), “How Is Manifest Branding Strategy Related to the Intangible Value of a Corporation?”Journal of Marketing, 68 (October), 126–41.
56.
ReibsteinDavid J., and TraverPhillis A. (1982), “Factors Affecting Coupon Redemption,”Journal of Marketing, 46 (October), 102–113.
57.
RobertsJohn H., and LattinJames M. (1991), “Development and Testing of a Model of Consideration Set Composition,”Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (November), 429–40.
58.
RoschEleanor, and MervisCarolyn B. (1975), “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories,”Cognitive Psychology, 7 (4), 573–605.
59.
RossiPeter E., and AllenbyGreg M. (1993), “A Bayesian Approach to Estimating Household Parameters,”Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (May), 171–82.
60.
RossiPeter E., AllenbyGreg M., and McCullochRobert (2005), Bayesian Statistics and Marketing.West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
61.
SeetharamanP.B., AinslieAndrew, and ChintaguntaPradeep K. (1999), “Investigating Household State Dependence Effects Across Categories,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (November), 488–500.
62.
SenAmartya (1977), “Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination,”Econometrica, 45 (1), 53–89.
63.
SenSankar, and BhattacharyaC.B. (2001), “Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (May), 225–43.
64.
SinghVishal P., HansenKarsten T., and GuptaSachin (2005), “Modeling Preferences for Common Attributes in Multicategory Brand Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (May), 195–209.
65.
SmithEdward E., OshersonDaniel N., RippsLance J., and KeaneMargaret (1988), “Combining Prototypes: A Selective Modification Model,”Cognitive Science, 12 (4), 485–27.
66.
SobelJoel (2005), “Interdependent Preferences and Reciprocity,”Journal of Economic Literature, 43 (May), 382–436.
67.
StrahilevitzMichal (1999) “The Effects of Product Type and Donation Magnitude on Willingness to Pay More for a Charity-Linked Brand,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8 (3), 215–41.
68.
SujanMita (1985), “Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (June), 16–31.
69.
WebbDeborah J., and MohrLois A. (1998), “A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17 (Fall), 226–38.
70.
WernerfeltBirger (1988), “Umbrella Branding as a Signal of New Product Quality: An Example of Signaling by Posting a Bond,”RAND Journal of Economics, 19 (3), 458–66.
71.
YeeMichael, DahanEly, HauserJohn R., and OrlinJames (2007), “Greedoid-Based Noncompensatory Inference,”Marketing Science, 26 (4), 532–49.
72.
YorkstonEric A., NunesJoseph C., and MattaShashi (2010), “The Malleable Brand: The Role of Implicit Theories in Evaluating Brand Extensions,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (January), 80–93.
73.
ZajoncRobert B., and MarkusHazel (1980), “Affective and Cognitive Factors in Preferences,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September), 123–31.
74.
ZmudaNatalie, and YorkEmily Bryson (2010), “Cause Effect: Brands Rush to Save World One Deed at a Time,”Advertising Age, 81 (9), 1–2.
