There has been little research on how market disruptions affect customer–brand relationships and how firms can sustain brand loyalty when disruptions occur. Drawing from social identity theory and the brand loyalty literature, the authors propose a conceptual framework to examine these issues in a specific market disruption, namely, the introduction of a radically new brand. The framework focuses on the time-varying effects of customers’ identification with and perceived value of the incumbent relative to the new brand on switching behavior. The authors divert from the conventional economic perspective of treating brand switching as functional utility maximization to propose that brand switching can also result from customers’ social mobility between brand identities. The results from longitudinal data of 679 customers during the launch of the iPhone in Spain show that both relative customer–brand identification and relative perceived value of the incumbent inhibit switching behavior, but their effects vary over time. Relative customer–brand identification with the incumbent apparently exerts a stronger longitudinal restraint on switching behavior than relative perceived value of the incumbent. The study has important strategic implications for devising customer relationship strategies and brand investment.
AakerDavid A. (1995), Building Strong Brands.New York: The Free Press.
2.
AakerJennifer (1999), “The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Persuasion,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (February), 45–57.
3.
AakerJennifer, FournierSusan, and BraselS. Adam (2004), “When Good Brands Do Bad,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (June), 1–16.
4.
AhearneMichael, BhattacharyaC.B., and GruenThomas (2005), “Antecedents and Consequences of Customer-Company Identification: Expanding the Role of Relationship Marketing,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (3), 574–85.
5.
AhearneMichael, JelinekRonald, and JonesEli (2007), “Examining the Effect of Salesperson Service Behavior in a Competitive Context,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35 (4), 603–616.
6.
AhluwaliaRohini (2000), “Examination of Psychological Processes Underlying Resistance to Persuasion,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (September), 217–32.
7.
AlbaJoesph W., and ChattopadhyayAmitava (1986), “Salience Effects in Brand Recall,”Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (November), 363–69.
8.
ArnettDennis B., GermanSteve D., and HuntShelby D. (2003), “The Identity Salience Model of Relationship Marketing Success: The Case of Nonprofit Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 67 (April), 89–105.
9.
ArnouldEric J., and ThompsonCraig J. (2005), “Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (March), 868–82.
10.
AshforthBlake E., HarrisonSpencer H., and CorleyKevin G. (2008), “Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions,”Journal of Management, 34 (3), 325–74.
11.
AshforthBlake E., and MaelFred (1989), “Social Identity Theory and the Organization,”Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), 20–39.
12.
AshokKalidas, DillonWilliam R., and YuanSophie (2002), “Extending Discrete Choice Models to Incorporate Attitudinal and Other Latent Variables,”Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (February), 31–46.
13.
BagozziRichard P. (1975), “Marketing as Exchange,”Journal of Marketing, 39 (October), 32–39.
14.
BagozziRichard P. (1995), “Reflections on Relationship Marketing in Consumer Markets,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23 (4), 272–77.
15.
BagozziRichard P., and DholakiaUtpal M. (2006), “Antecedents and Purchase Consequences of Customer Participation in Small Group Brand Communities,”International Journal of Research Marketing, 23 (March), 45–61.
16.
BelkRussell W. (1988), “Possessions and the Extended Self,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (September), 139–68.
17.
BemDaryl J. (1967), “Self-Perception: An Alternative Interpretation of Cognitive Dissonance Phenomena,”Psychological Review, 74 (3), 183–200.
18.
BergamiMassimo, and BagozziRichard P. (2000), “Self-Categorization, Affective Commitment, and Group Self-Esteem as Distinct Aspects of Social Identity in the Organization,”British Journal of Social Psychology, 39 (4), 555–77.
19.
BhattacharyaC. B., and LodishLeonard (2000), “Towards a System for Monitoring Brand Health from Store Scanner Data,” MSI Working Paper, Report No. 00–111.
20.
BhattacharyaC.B., RaoHayagreeva, and GlynnMary Ann (1995), “Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of Its Correlates Among Art Museum Members,”Journal of Marketing, 59 (October), 46–57.
21.
BhattacharyaC. B., and SenSankar (2003), “Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies,”Journal of Marketing, 67 (April), 76–88.
22.
BoltonLisa E., and ReedAmericusII (2004), “Sticky Priors: The Perseverance of Identity Effects on Judgment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (November), 397–410.
23.
BoltonRuth N., and DrewJames H. (1991), “A Multistage Model of Customers’ Assessments of Service Quality and Value,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (March), 375–84.
24.
BrewerMarilynn B. (1979), “Ingroup Bias in the Minimal Inter-group Situation: A Cognitive–Motivational Analysis,”Psychological Bulletin, 86 (2), 307–324.
25.
BrownTom J., BarryThomas E., DacinPeter A., and GunstRichard F. (2005), “Spreading the Word: Investigating Antecedents of Consumers’ Positive Word-of-Mouth Intentions and Behaviors in a Retailing Context,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33 (March), 123–38.
26.
BurnhamThomas A., FrelsJudy K., and MahajanVijay (2003), “Consumer Switching Costs: A Typology, Antecedents, and Consequences,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (March), 109–126.
27.
CarùAntonella, and CovaBernard (2003), “Revisiting Consumption Experience: A More Humble but Complete View of the Concept,”Marketing Theory, 3 (2), 267–86.
28.
ChaplinLan Nguyen, and JohnDeborah Roedder (2005), “The Development of Self-Brand Connections in Children and Adolescents,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (1), 119–29.
29.
ChaudhuriArjun, and HolbrookMorris B. (2001), “The Chain Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty,”Journal of Marketing, 65 (April), 81–93.
30.
CooperLee G., and NakanishiMasao (1983), “Standardizing Variables in Multiplicative Choice Models,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (June), 96–108.
31.
DickAlan S., and BasuKunal (1994), “Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22 (2), 99–113.
32.
DoddsWilliam B., MonroeKent B., and GrewalDhruv (1991), “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (August), 307–319.
33.
DonavanD. Todd, JandaSwinder, and SuhJaebeom (2006), “Environmental Influences in Corporate Brand Identification and Outcomes,”Journal of Brand Management, 14 (1-2), 125–36.
34.
ElsbachKimberly D., and KramerRoderick M. (1996), “Members’ Responses to Organizational Identity Threats: Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (3), 442–76.
35.
EpsteinSeymour (1980), “The Self–Concept: A Review and the Proposal of an Integrated Theory of Personality,” in Personality: Basic Aspects and Current Research, StaubErvin, ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 82–132.
36.
ErdemTülin, SwaitJoffre, and ValenzuelaAna (2006), “Brands as Signals: A Cross-Country Validation,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (January), 34–49.
37.
EscalasJennifer Edson, and BettmanJames R. (2005), “Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (December), 378–89.
38.
FabrigarLeandre R., and PettyRichard E. (1999), “The Role of the Affective and Cognitive Bases of Attitudes in Susceptibility to Affectively and Cognitively Based Persuasion,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (3), 363–81.
39.
FestingerLeon (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
FornellClaes, and LarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 39–50.
41.
FournierSusan (1998), “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (March), 343–73.
42.
GarbarinoEllen, and JohnsonMark S. (1999), “The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 63 (April), 70–87.
43.
GardnerBurleigh B., and LevySidney J. (1955), “The Product and the Brand,”Harvard Business Review, 33 (March–April), 33–39.
44.
GuadagniPeter M., and LittleJohn D.C. (1983), “A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data: A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data,”Marketing Science, 2 (3), 203–238.
45.
HenryKelly Bouas, ArrowHolly, and CariniBarbara (1999), “A Tripartite Model of Group Identification: Theory and Measurement,”Small Group Research, 30 (5), 558–81.
46.
HolbrookMorris B., and CorfmanKim P. (1985), “Quality and Value in the Consumption Experience: Phaedrus Rides Again,” in Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, JacobyJacob, and OlsonJerry C., eds. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 31–57.
47.
HomburgChristian, KoschateNicole, and HoyerWayne D. (2006), “The Role of Cognition and Affect in the Formation of Customer Satisfaction: A Dynamic Perspective,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (July), 84–96.
48.
JarvisCheryl, MacKenzieScott B., and PodsakoffPhilip M. (2003), “A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (September), 199–218.
49.
JohnsonMichael D., HerrmannAndreas, and HuberFrank (2006), “The Evolution of Loyalty Intentions,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (April), 122–32.
50.
JonesThomas O., and SasserW. EarlJr. (1995), “Why Satisfied Customers Defect,”Harvard Business Review, 73 (November–December), 88–99.
51.
KeaveneySusan M. (1995), “Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study,”Journal of Marketing, 59 (April), 71–82.
52.
KellerKevin Lane (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,”Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 1–22.
53.
KellerKevin Lane (2008), Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, 3d ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
54.
KellerKevin Lane, and LehmannDonald R. (2006), “Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities,”Marketing Science, 25 (6), 740–59.
55.
KihlstromJohn F., and KleinStanley B. (1994), “The Self as a Knowledge Structure,” in Handbook of Social Cognition, WyerRobert S.Jr., and SrullThomas K., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 153–208.
KleineSusan Schultz, KleineRobert E.III, and AllenChris T. (1995), “How Is a Possession ‘Me’ or ‘Not Me'? Characterizing Types and Antecedents of Material Possession Attachment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (December), 327–43.
58.
KundaZiva (1990), “The Case for Motivated Reasoning,”Psychological Bulletin, 108 (3), 480–98.
59.
LancasterKevin J. (1966), “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,”Journal of Political Economy, 74 (2), 132–57.
60.
LastovickaJohn L., and GardnerDavid M. (1979), “Components of Involvement,” in Attitude Research Plays for High Stakes, MaloneyJ.C., and SilvermanB., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 53–73.
61.
LeckyPrescott (1945), Self-Consistency: A Theory of Personality.New York: Island Press.
62.
LevingerGeorge (1979), “Toward the Analysis of Close Relationships,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16 (6), 510–44.
63.
LuhtanenRiia L., and CrockerJennifer (1992), “A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One's Social Identity,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18 (3), 302–318.
64.
MaelFred, and AshforthBlake E. (1992), “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification,”Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13 (2), 103–123.
65.
McAlexanderJames H., SchoutenJohn W., and KoenigHarold F. (2002), “Building Brand Community,”Journal of Marketing, 66 (January), 38–54.
66.
McCrackenGrant (1988), Culture and Consumption.Blooming-ton: Indiana University Press.
67.
McFaddenDaniel (1986), “The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research,”Marketing Science, 5 (4), 275–97.
68.
MertzMichael A., HeYi, and VargoStephen L. (2009), “The Evolving Brand Logic: A Service–Dominant Logic Perspective,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37 (3), 328–44.
69.
MeyerJohn P., BeckerThomas E., and van DickRolf (2006), “Social Identities and Commitments at Work: Toward an Integrative Model,”Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (5), 665–83.
70.
MittalVikas, and KamakuraWagner A. (2001), “Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Customer Characteristics,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (February), 131–42.
71.
MunizAlbert M.Jr., and O'GuinnThomas C. (2001), “Brand Community,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (4), 412–32.
72.
OliverRichard L. (1999), “Whence Consumer Loyalty?”Journal of Marketing, 63 (October), 33–44.
73.
OswaldLaura R. (1999), “Culture Swapping: Consumption and the Ethnogenesis of Middle-Class Haitan Immigrants,”Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (March), 303–318.
74.
OysermanDaphna (2009), “Identity-Based Motivation: Implications for Action-Readiness, Procedural Readiness, and Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19 (3), 250–60.
75.
ParkC. Whan, MacInnisDeborah J., and PriesterJoseph R. (2009), “Research Directions on Strong Brand Relationships,” in Handbook of Brand Relationships, MacInnisDeborah J., ParkC. Whan, and PriesterJoseph R., eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 379–91.
76.
PrahaladC. K., and RamaswamyVenkat (2004), “Co-Creation Experiences: The Next Practice in Value Creation,”Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18 (3), 5–14.
77.
RaoHayagreeva, DavisGerald F., and WardAndrew (2000), “Embeddedness, Social Identity and Mobility: Why Firms Leave the NASDAQ and Join the New York Stock Exchange,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (2), 268–92.
78.
ReedAmericusII (2002), “Social Identity as a Useful Perspective for Self-Concept Based Consumer Research,”Psychology & Marketing, 19 (3), 235–66.
79.
RichinsMarsha L. (1994), “Valuing Things: The Public and Private Meanings of Possessions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (December), 504–521.
80.
RindfleischAric, MalterAlan J., GanesanShankar, and MoormanChristine (2008), “Cross-Sectional Versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (June), 261–79.
81.
RustRoland, ZeithamlValarie A., and LemonKatherine N. (2000), Driving Customer Equity: How Customer Lifetime Value Is Reshaping Corporate Strategy.New York: The Free Press.
82.
ShethJagdish N., NewmanBruce I., and GrossBarbara L. (1991), “Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values,”Journal of Business Research, 22 (2), 159–70.
83.
SirgyM. Joseph (1982), “Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (December), 287–300.
84.
SlotegraafRebecca J., and InmanJ. Jeffrey (2004), “Longitudinal Shifts in the Drivers of Satisfaction with Product Quality: The Role of Attribute Resolvability,”Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (August), 269–80.
85.
SolomonMichael R. (1983), “The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (December), 319–29.
86.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., and GielensKatrijn (2003), “Consumer and Market Drivers of the Trial Probability of New Consumer Packaged Goods,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (December), 368–84.
87.
SternBarbara B. (2006), “What Does Brand Mean? Historical-Analysis Method and Construct Definition,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 216–23.
88.
SternBarbara B., ThompsonCraig J., and ArnouldEric J. (1998), “Narrative Analysis of a Marketing Relationship: The Consumer's Perspective,”Psychology & Marketing, 15 (3), 195–214.
89.
StrykerSheldon (1968), “Identity Salience and Role Performance: The Relevance of Symbolic Interaction Theory for Family Research,”Journal of Marriage and Family, 30 (4), 558–64.
90.
SwaitJoffre, and ErdemTülim (2007), “Brand Effects on Choice and Choice Set Formation Under Uncertainty,”Marketing Science, 26 (5), 679–97.
91.
SwannWilliam B., RentfrowPeter J., and GuinnJennifer S. (2003), “Self-Verification: The Search for Coherence,” in Handbook of Self and Identity, LearyMark R., and TangneyJune Price, eds. New York: The Guilford Press, 367–83.
92.
SweeneyJillian C., and SoutarGeoffrey N. (2001), “Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale,”Journal of Retailing, 77 (2), 203–220.
93.
TajfelHenri (1982), “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations,”Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.
94.
TajfelHenri, and TurnerJohn C. (1979), “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior,” in Psychology of Intergroup Relations, WorchelStephen, and AustinWilliam G., eds. Chicago: NelsonHall, 33–47.
95.
ThomsonMatthew, MacInnisDeborah J., and ParkC. Whan (2005), “The Ties that Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachment to Brands,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (1), 77–91.
96.
TriandisHarry C. (1989), “The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts,”Psychological Review, 96 (3), 506–520.
97.
TverskyAmos, and KahnemanDaniel (1982), “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability,” in Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, KahnemanDaniel, SlovicPaul, and TverskyAmos, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 163–78.
98.
Van den BulteChristophe, and LilienGary L. (2004), “Two-Stage Partial Observability Models of Innovation Adoption,” working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
99.
Van DickRolf, WagnerUlrich, StellmacherJost, and ChristOliver (2004), “The Utility of a Broader Conceptualization of Organizational Identification: Which Aspects Really Matter?”Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77 (2), 171–91.
100.
Van KnippenbergDaan, and SleebosEd (2006), “Organizational Identification Versus Organizational Commitment: Self-Definition, Social Exchange, and Job Attitudes,”Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (5), 571–84.
101.
Van TrijpHans C.M., HoyerWayne D., and Jeffrey InmanJ. (1996), “Why Switch? Product Category-Level Explanation for True Variety-Seeking Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (August), 281–92.
102.
VogelVerena, EvanschitzkyHeiner, and RamaseshanB. (2008), “Customer Equity Drivers and Future Sales,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (November), 98–108.
103.
WänkeMichaela, BohnerGerd, and JurkowitschAndreas (1997), “There Are Many Reasons to Drive a BMW: Does Imagined Ease of Argument Generation Influence Attitudes?”Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (September), 170–77.
104.
WegenerDuane T., SawickiVanessa, and PettyRichard E. (2009), “Attitudes as a Basis for Brand Relationships,” in Handbook of Brand Relationships, MacInnisDeborah J., ParkC. Whan, and PriesterJoseph R., eds. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 283–304.
105.
WoldHerman (1982), “Soft Modeling: The Basic Design and Some Extensions,” in Systems under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction, Vol. 2, JöresborgK.G., and WoldHerman, eds. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1–54.
106.
ZajoncRobert C., and MarkusHazel (1982), “Affective and Cognitive Factors in Preferences,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September), 123–31.
107.
ZeithamlValarie A. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,”Journal of Marketing, 52 (July), 2–22.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
