Two key issues in business-to-business (B2B) sales force management are (1) how much a given sales job should be compensated (pay level) and (2) how much of the compensation should be fixed versus variable (pay structure). The authors examine the paychecks drawn by people in more than 14,000 selling jobs and more than 4000 sales management jobs in five B2B industry sectors in five European countries. They show that pay levels and structures reflect an apparent balancing of two conflicting pressures: the economic imperative (to reward better performers by heightening pay dispersion) and the compensation differential compression resulting from high tax regimes. In particular, B2B firms appear to use variable pay as a way to lessen the salary differential compression impact of high tax regimes on salesperson motivation. Furthermore, similar to chief executive officers, sales managers can have an important multiplier effect that justifies paying them at increasing rates as job challenge rises.
AlbersSönke (2002), “Salesforce Management: Compensation, Motivation, Selection, and Training,” in Handbook of Marketing, WeitzBarton A., and WensleyRobin, eds. London: Sage Publications, 248–66.
2.
AMADEUS (2004), Analyse Major Databases from European Sources.Brussels, Belgium: Bureau Van Dijk Electronic Publishing.
3.
AndersonRolph E. (1996), “Personal Selling and Sales Management in the New Millennium,”Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 16 (Fall), 17–32.
4.
BaronJames N., and KrepsDavid M. (1999), Strategic Human Resources: Frameworks for General Managers.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BasuAmiya, LalRajiv, SrinivasanV., and StaelinRichard (1985), “Salesforce Compensation Plans: An Agency Theoretic Perspective,”Marketing Science, 4 (4), 267–91.
6.
BelseyDavid A., KuhErnest S., and WelschRoy E. (1982), Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7.
BreuschTrevor S., and PaganAdrian R. (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics,”Review of Economic Studies, 47 (1), 239–53.
8.
BrownSteven P., EvansKenneth R., MantralaMurali, and ChallagallaGoutam (2005), “Adapting Motivation, Control, and Compensation Research to a New Environment,”Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 25 (2), 156–67.
9.
CappelliPeter (1999), The New Deal at Work.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10.
ChowGregory C. (1960), “Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions,”Econometrica, 28 (July), 591–605.
11.
CooperLee G. (1993), “Market-Share Models,” in Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Marketing, Vol. 5, EliashbergJehoshua, and LilienGary L., eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 259–314.
12.
CoughlanAnne T. (1993), “Salesforce Compensation: A Review of MS/OR Advances,” in Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Marketing, Vol. 5, EliashbergJehoshua, and LilienGary L., eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 611–50.
13.
CoughlanAnne T., and NarasimhanChakravarthi (1992), “An Empirical Analysis of Sales-Force Compensation Plans,”Journal of Business, 65 (1), 93–121.
14.
CoughlanAnne T., and SenSubrata K. (1989), “Salesforce Compensation: Theory and Managerial Implications,”Marketing Science, 8 (4), 324–42.
15.
DavenportRobert J. (2001), “Designing Reward Systems for Today's Sales Professionals,” in The Executive Handbook of Compensation, FayCharles H., ThompsonMichael A., and DamienKnight, eds. New York: The Free Press, 284–91.
EchambadiRaj, and HessJames (2007), “Mean-Centering Does Not Alleviate Collinearity Problems in Moderated Multiple Regression Models,”Marketing Science, 26 (May–June), 438–45.
18.
EllingMartin E., FogleHolly J., McKhannCharles S., and SimonChris (2002), “Making More of Pharma's Sales Force,”The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 86–95.
19.
GerhartBarry, and MilkovichGeorge T. (1990), “Organizational Differences in Managerial Compensation and Financial Performance,”Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), 663–91.
20.
Gomez-MejiaLuis R., and BalkinDavid B. (1992), Compensation, Organizational Strategy, and Firm Performance.Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing.
21.
Gomez-MejiaLuis R., Larraza-KintanaMartin, and MakriMarianna (2003), “The Determinants of Executive Compensation in Family-Controlled Public Corporations,”Academy of Management Journal, 46 (April), 226–37.
22.
GooderhamPaul N., NordhaugOdd, and RingdalKristen (1999), “Institutional and Rational Determinants of Organizational Practices: Human Resource Management Practices in European Firms,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (3), 507–531.
23.
GottschalkPeter, and SmeedingTimothy M. (1997), “Cross National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality,”Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (6), 633–87.
24.
HollisterMatissa N. (2004), “Does Firm Size Matter Anymore? The New Economy and Firm Size Wage Effects,”American Sociological Review, 69 (10), 659–76.
25.
JohnGeorge, and WeitzBarton (1989), “Salesforce Compensation: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Related to Use of Salary Versus Incentive Compensation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (February), 1–14.
26.
JonesEli, BrownSteven B., ZoltnersAndris, and WeitzBarton A. (2005), “The Changing Environment of Selling and Sales Management,”Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 25 (2), 105–111.
27.
JosephKissan, and KalwaniManohar U. (1998), “The Role of Bonus Pay in Salesforce Compensation Plans,”Industrial Marketing Management, 27 (2), 147–59.
28.
JosephKissan, and ThevaranjanAlex (1998), “Monitoring and Incentives in Sales Organizations: An Agency-Theoretic Perspective,”Marketing Science, 17 (2), 107–123.
29.
KrafftManfred (1999), “An Empirical Investigation of the Antecedents of Sales Force Control Systems,”Journal of Marketing, 63 (July), 120–34.
30.
KrafftManfred, AlbersSönke, and LalRajiv (2004), “Relative Explanatory Power of Agency Theory and Transaction Cost Analysis in German Salesforces,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (2), 265–83.
31.
LalRajiv, and SrinivasanV. (1993), “Compensation Plans for Single and Multi-Product Salesforces: An Application of the Holmstrom-Milgrom Model,”Management Science, 39 (7), 777–93.
32.
LazearEdward P. (1995), “A Jobs-Based Analysis of Labor Markets,”American Economic Review, 85 (2), 260–65.
33.
LukeDouglas A. (2004), Multilevel Modeling.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
34.
MacKenzieScott B., PodsakoffPhilip M., and PaineJulie Beth (1999), “Do Citizenship Behaviors Matter More for Managers Than for Salespeople?”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (4), 396–410.
35.
MarquardtDonald W. (1970), “Generalized Inverses, Ridge Regression, Biased Linear Estimation, and Nonlinear Estimation”Technometrics, 12 (3), 591–612.
36.
MilkovichGeorge T., and NewmanJerry M. (2002), Compensation, 7th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
MillerJanice S., WisemanRobert M., and Gomez-MejiaLuis R. (2002), “The Fit Between CEO Compensation Design and Firm Risk,”Academy of Management Journal, 45 (August), 745–56.
38.
MisraSanjog, CoughlanAnne T., and NarasimhanChakravarthi (2005), “Salesforce Compensation: An Analytical and Empirical Examination of the Agency Theoretic Approach”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 3 (1), 5–39.
39.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2003), “Purchasing Power Parities (PPP),” (accessed July 7, 2009), [available http://www.oecd.org/std/ppp].
40.
O'ShaughnessyK.C., LevineDavid I., and CappelliPeter (2001), “Changes in Managerial Pay Structures 1986–1992 and Rising Returns to Skill,”Oxford Economic Papers, 53 (3), 482–507.
41.
RaudenbushStephen W., and BrykAnthony S. (2001), Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42.
RyansAdrian B., and WeinbergCharles B. (1987), “Territory Sales Response Models: Stability over Time,”Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (May), 229–33.
43.
SandersW.M. Gerard, and CarpenterMason A. (1998), “Internationalization and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation, Top Team Composition, and Board Structure,”Academy of Management Journal, 41 (April), 158–78.
44.
SegallaMichael, RouzièsDominique, BessonMadeleine, and WeitzBart A. (2006), “A Cross-National Investigation of Incentive Sales Compensation,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23 (4), 419–33.
45.
SperlingRichard (2001), “Appendix: The Hay Guide Chart®—Profile Method,” in The Executive Handbook on Compensation, FayCharles H., ThompsonMichael A., and DamienKnight, eds. New York: The Free Press, 793–828.
46.
WeissTracey (2001), “Solving the Performance Management Dilemma: One Size Does Not Fit All,” in The Executive Handbook on Compensation, FayCharles H., ThompsonMichael A., and DamienKnight, eds. New York: The Free Press, 496–512.
47.
WernerSteve, and WardStephanie G. (2004), “Recent Compensation Research: An Eclectic Review,”Human Resource Management Review, 14 (2), 201–227.
48.
ZajacEdward J., and WestphalJames D. (1995), “Accounting for the Explanations of CEO Compensation: Substance and Symbolism,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (June), 283–308.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
