The authors analyze cherry-picking in the context of grocery shopping, comparing the behavior of consumers who visit two grocery stores on the same day (8% of shopping trips) with single-store shoppers. The authors find cherry-picking to be consistent with rational economic behavior. Cherry pickers benefit by saving 5% more per item while buying systematically (67%) larger market baskets.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckerGary (1965), “A Theory of the Allocation of Time,”Economic Journal, 75 (299), 493–517.
2.
BlattbergRobert C., BuesingThomas, PeacockPeter, and SenSubrata K. (1978), “Identifying the Deal Prone Segment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (August), 369–77.
3.
BlattbergRobert C., and NeslinScott A. (1990), Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods and Strategies.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BurdettKenneth, and MaluegDavid A. (1981), “The Theory of Search for Several Goods,”Journal of Economic Theory, 24 (3), 362–76.
5.
CarlsonJohn A., and GiesekeRobert J. (1983), “Price Search in a Product Market,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (March), 357–65.
6.
CarlsonJohn A., and McAfeeR. Preston (1984), “Joint Search for Several Goods,”Journal of Economic Theory, 32 (2), 337–45.
7.
Consumer Reports (1988), “How Much Money Smart Supermarket Shopping Can Save,” (March), 158.
8.
DotiJames L., and SharirShmuel (1980), “Households’ Grocery Shopping Behavior in the Short-Run: Theory and Evidence,”Economic Inquiry, 19 (April), 196–208.
9.
DrèzeXavier (1999), “Rehabilitating Cherry-Picking,” working paper, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California.
10.
FeickLawrence F., and PriceLinda L. (1987), “The Market Maven: A Diffuser of Marketplace Information,”Journal of Marketing, 51 (January), 83–97.
11.
Hayes-RothBarbara, and Hayes-RothFrederick (1979), “A Cognitive Model of Planning,”Cognitive Science, 3 (4), 275–310.
12.
HochStephen J., KimByung D., MontgomeryAlan L., and RossiPeter E. (1995), “Determinants of Store-Level Price Elasticity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (February), 17–29.
IrwinJulie R., and McClellandGary H. (2001), “Misleading Heuristics and Moderated Multiple Regression Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (February), 100–109.
LalRajiv, and RaoRam C. (1997), “Supermarket Competition: The Case of Everyday Low Pricing,”Marketing Science, 16 (1), 60–80.
17.
LevyMichael, and WeitzBarton A. (2004), Retailing Management, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
18.
LippmanSteven A., and McCardleKevin F. (1991), “Uncertain Search: A Model of Search Among Technologies of Uncertain Values,”Management Science, 37 (11), 1474–90.
19.
MarmorsteinHoward, GrewalDhruv, and FisheRaymond P.H. (1992), “The Value of Time Spent in Price Comparison Shopping: Survey and Experimental Evidence,”Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (June), 52–61.
20.
MMR (2002), “Wal-Mart's Challenge,”19 (5), 5.
21.
NarasimhanChakravarti (1988), “Competitive Promotional Strategies,”Journal of Business, 61 (4), 427–49.
22.
PetrevuSanjay, and RatchfordBrian T. (1997), “A Model of Search Behavior with an Application to Grocery Shopping,”Journal of Retailing, 73 (4), 463–86.
23.
RajuJagmohan, SrinivasanV., and LalRajiv (1988), “The Effects of Brand Loyalty on Competitive Price Promotional Strategies,”Management Science, 36 (3), 276–304.
24.
RatchfordBrian T., and SrinivasanNarasimhan (1993), “An Empirical Investigation of Returns to Search,”Marketing Science, 12 (1), 73–87.
25.
SchindlerRobert M. (1992), “A Coupon Is More Than a Low Price: Evidence from a Shopping-Simulation Study,”Psychology and Marketing, 9 (November/December), 431–51.
26.
StiglerGeorge J. (1961), “The Economics of Information,”Journal of Political Economy, 69 (June), 213–25.
27.
TobinJames (1958), “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables,”Econometrica, 26, 24–36.
28.
UrbanyJoel E., DicksonPeter R., and KalapurakalRosemary (1996), “Price Search in the Retail Grocery Market,”Journal of Marketing, 60 (April), 91–104.
