This article develops empirically based guidelines to help managers select typefaces that affect strategically valued impressions. The authors discuss the potential trade-offs among the impressions created by typeface (e.g., pleasing, engaging, reassuring, prominent). The selection of typeface can be simplified with the use of six underlying design dimensions: elaborate, harmony, natural, flourish, weight, and compressed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerlyneDaniel E. (1971), Aesthetics and Psychobiology.New York: Meredith Corporation.
2.
BerlyneDaniel E. (1974), Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
BlochPeter H. (1995), “Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response,”Journal of Marketing, 59 (July), 16–29.
4.
BlochPeter H., BrunelFrederic F., and ArnoldTodd J. (2003), “Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (March), 551–65.
5.
BornsteinRobert F., and D'AgostinoPaul R. (1992), “Stimulus Recognition and the Mere Exposure Effect,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (October), 545–52.
6.
BradshawJohn L. (1984), “A Guide to Norms, Ratings, and Lists,”Memory and Cognition, 12 (2), 202–206.
7.
ChildersTerry L., and JassJeffrey (2002), “All Dressed Up with Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Associations on Brand Perceptions and Consumer Memory,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (2), 93–106.
8.
ColarelliStephen M., and DettmannJoseph R. (2003), “Intuitive Evolutionary Perspectives in Marketing Practices,”Psychology and Marketing, 20 (9), 837–65.
9.
CraigJames (1980), Designing with Type: A Basic Course in Typography.New York: Watson-Guptill Publications.
ErnstSandra B. (1977), The ABC's of Typography.New York: Art Direction Book Company.
12.
EysenckHans J. (1988), “Personality and Scientific Aesthetics,” in The Foundations of Aesthetics, Art, and Art Education, FarleyFrank H., and NeperudRonald W., eds. New York: Praeger Publishers, 117–60.
13.
HendersonPamela W., and CoteJoseph A. (1998), “Guidelines for Selecting or Modifying Logos,”Journal of Marketing, 62 (April), 14–30.
14.
HendersonPamela W., and CoteJoseph A., LeongSiew Meng, and SchmittBernd (2003), “Building Strong Brands in Asia: Selecting the Visual Components of Image to Maximize Brand Strength,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20 (4), 297–313.
15.
HertensteinJulie H., and PlattMarjorie B. (2001), “Valuing Design: Enhancing Corporate Performance Through Design Effectiveness,”Design Management Journal, 12 (Summer), 10–19.
16.
HinrichsKit, and HirasunaDelphine (1990), Typewise.Cincinnati: F&W Publications Inc.
17.
HirschmanElizabeth C. (1980), “Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity,”Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (3), 283–95.
HuttonJim (1997), “The Influence of Brand and Corporate Identity on Consumer Behavior: A Conceptual Framework,”Journal of Brand Management, 5 (November), 428–39.
20.
KlingerMark R., and GreenwaldAnthony G. (1994), “Preferences Need No Inferences: The Cognitive Basis of Unconscious Mere Exposure Effects,” in The Heart's Eye: Emotional Influences in Perception and Attention, NiedenthalPaula M., and KitayamaShinobu, eds. San Diego: Academic Press, 67–85.
21.
MartindaleColin (1988), “Aesthetics, Psychobiology, and Cognition,” in The Foundations of Aesthetics, Art, and Art Education, FarleyFrank H., and NeperudRonald W., eds. New York: Praeger Publishers, 7–42.
22.
MartindaleColin, and MooreKathleen (1988), “Priming, Prototypicality, and Preference,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14 (4), 661–70.
23.
McCarthyMichael S., and MothersbaughDavid L. (2002), “Effects of Typographic Factors in Advertising-Based Persuasion: A General Model and Initial Empirical Tests,”Psychology and Marketing, 19 (July–August), 663–91.
24.
MehrabianAlbert, and RussellJames (1974), An Approach to Environmental Psychology.Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
25.
OhanianRoobina (1990), “Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness,”Journal of Advertising, 19 (3), 39–52.
26.
O'LearyNoreen (1987), “Legibility Lost: Why Are So Many Ads So Hard to Read?”Adweek, (October 5), D7–D10.
27.
OsgoodCharles E., SuciGeorge J., and TannenbaumPercy H. (1957), The Measurement of Meaning.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
28.
PanYigang, and SchmittBernd H. (1996), “Language and Brand Attitudes: Impact of Script and Sound Matching in Chinese and English,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5 (3), 263–77.
29.
RoweCamille L. (1982), “The Connotative Dimensions of Selected Display Typefaces,”Information Design Journal, 3 (1), 30–37.
30.
ShapiroStewart (1999), “When an Ad's Influence Is Beyond Our Conscious Control: Perceptual and Conceptual Fluency Effects Caused by Incidental Ad Exposure,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (June), 16–36.
31.
SolomonMartin (1991), “Typography: More Than Words,” in Designer's Guide to Typography, Aldrich-RuenzelNancy, and FennellJohn, eds. New York: Watson-Guptill Publications, 32–37.
32.
SomerickNancy M. (2000), “Practical Strategies for Avoiding Problems in Graphic Communication,”Public Relations Quarterly, 45 (3), 32–34.
SpaethTony (1995), “What Does It All Mean?”Across the Board, 32 (February), 53–55.
35.
SpaethTony (1999), “Powerbrands,”Across the Board, 36 (2), 23–28.
36.
TannenbaumPercy H., JacobsonHarvey K., and NorrisEleanor L. (1964), “An Experimental Investigation of Typeface Connotation,”Journalism Quarterly, 41 (Winter), 65–73.
37.
TantilloJohn, DiLorenzo-AissJanet, and MathisenRichard E. (1995), “Quantifying Perceived Differences in Type Styles: An Exploratory Study,”Psychology & Marketing, 12 (5), 447–57.
38.
TavassoliNader T. (2001), “Color Memory and Evaluations for Alphabetic and Logographic Brand Names,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7 (June), 104–111.
39.
TavassoliNader T. (2002), “Spatial Memory for Chinese and English,”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33 (July), 415–31.
40.
TavassoliNader T., and HanJin K. (2001), “Scripted Thought: Processing Korean Hancha and Hangul in a Multimedia Context,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (December), 482–93.
41.
TavassoliNader T., and HanJin K. (2002), “Auditory and Visual Brand Identifiers in Chinese and English,”Journal of International Marketing, 10 (2), 13–28.
42.
Van den BerghOmer, and VranaScott R. (1998), “Repetition and Boredom in a Perceptual Fluency/Attributional Model of Affective Judgment,”Cognition and Emotion, 12 (4), 533–53.
43.
VeryzerRobert W.Jr. (1999), “A Nonconscious Processing Explanation of Consumer Response to Product Design,”Psychology and Marketing, 16 (6), 497–522.
44.
VeryzerRobert W.Jr., and HutchinsonJ. Wesley (1998), “The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (March), 374–95.
45.
WalkerPeter, SmithSylvia, and LivingstonAlan (1986), “Predicting the Appropriateness of a Typeface on the Basis of Its Multimodal Features,”Information Design Journal, 5 (1), 29–42.
WhitfieldT.W.A. (1983), “Predicting Preference for Familiar, Everyday Objects, An Experimental Confrontation Between Two Theories of Aesthetic Behaviour,”Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3 (September), 221–37.
48.
WhitfieldT.W.A., and SlaterP.E. (1979), “The Effects of Categorization and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Choice in a Furniture Selection Task,”British Journal of Psychology, 70 (February), 65–76.
49.
WhittleseaBruce W.A. (1993), “Illusions of Familiarity,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19 (November), 1235–53.
