BassFrank M. and WittinkDick R. (1975), “Pooling Issues and Methods in Regression Analysis with Examples in Marketing Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (November), 414–25.
2.
BusinessWeek (1998), “The Best B-Schools,” (October 19), 92.
3.
CattinPhilippe and WittinkDick R. (1982), “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (Summer), 44–53.
4.
ChristenMarkus, GuptaSachin, PorterJohn C., StaelinRichard, and WittinkDick R. (1997), “Using Market-Level Data to Understand Nonlinear Promotion Effects,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (August), 322–34.
5.
CurrimImran S., WeinbergCharles B., and WittinkDick R. (1981), “The Design of Subscription Programs for a Performing Arts Series,” Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (June), 67–75.
6.
FoekensEijte W., LeeflangPeter S.H., and WittinkDick R. (1999), “Varying Parameter Models to Accommodate Dynamic Promotion Effects,” Journal of Econometrics, 89 (March–April), 249–68.
7.
FraenkelLiana, BogardusSidney, and WittinkDick R. (2001), “Understanding Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis with Adaptive Conjoint Analysis,” Medical Care, 39 (November), 1203–1216.
8.
FraenkelLiana, BogardusSidney, and WittinkDick R. (2003), “Risk-Attitude and Patient Treatment Preferences,” Lupus, 12, 370–76.
9.
FraenkelLiana, WittinkDick R., ConcatoJohn, and FriedTerri (2004a), “Are Preferences for Cox-2 Inhibitors Influenced by the Certainty Effect,” Journal of Rheumatology, 31 (3), 591–93.
10.
FraenkelLiana, WittinkDick R., ConcatoJohn, and FriedTerri (2004b), “Informed Choice and the Widespread Use of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, forthcoming.
11.
GomezMiguel I., McLaughlinEdward W., and WittinkDick R. (2004), “Customer Satisfaction and Retail Sales Performance: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Retailing, forthcoming.
12.
GuptaSachin, ChintaguntaPradeep K., KaulAnil, and WittinkDick R. (1996), “Do Household Scanner Panel Data Provide Representative Inferences from Brand Choices?” Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (November), 383–98.
13.
GuptaSachin, ChintaguntaPradeep K., and WittinkDick R. (1997), “Household Heterogeneity and State Dependence in a Model of Purchase Strings: Empirical Results and Managerial Implications,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14 (October), 342–58.
14.
GuptaSunil (1988), “Impact of Sales Promotions on When, What, and How Much to Buy,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (November), 342–55.
15.
HuberJoel C., WittinkDick R., FiedlerJohn A., and MillerRichard L. (1993), “The Effectiveness of Alternative Preference Elicitation Procedures in Predicting Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (February), 105–114.
16.
JohnsonRichard M. (1974), “Trade-Off Analysis of Consumer Values,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (May), 121–27.
17.
JohnsonRichard M. (1987), “Adaptive Conjoint Analysis,” in Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software, 253–65.
18.
KaulAnil and WittinkDick R. (1995), “Empirical Generalizations About the Impact of Advertising on Price and Price Sensitivity,” Marketing Science, 14 (Summer), G151–G160.
19.
KeilSev K., ReibsteinDavid, and WittinkDick R. (2001), “The Impact of Business Objectives and the Time of Horizon of Performance Evaluation on Pricing Behavior,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18 (June), 67–82.
20.
LeeflangPeter S.H. and WittinkDick R. (1992), “Diagnosing Competitive Reactions Using (Aggregate) Scanner Data,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9 (March), 39–57.
21.
LeeflangPeter S.H. and WittinkDick R. (1996), “Competitive Reaction Versus Consumer Response: Do Managers Overreact?” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (April), 103–119.
22.
LeeflangPeter S.H. and WittinkDick R. (2001), “Explaining Competitive Reaction Effects,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18 (June), 119–38.
23.
LeeflangPeter S.H., WittinkDick R., WedelMichel, and NaertPhilippe (2001), Building Models for Marketing Decisions. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24.
LittleJohn D.C. (1970), “Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus,” Management Science, 16 (April), B466–B485.
25.
LucasR.E. (1976), “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique,” in The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets, BrunnerK. and MeltzerA.H., eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 19–46.
26.
MontgomeryDavid B. and WittinkDick R. (1980), “The Predictive Validity of Conjoint Analysis for Alternative Aggregation Schemes,” in Market Measurement and Analysis, MontgomeryDavid B. and WittinkDick R., eds. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 298–309.
27.
MorrisonDonald G. and Silva-RossaJorge (1995), “A Latent Look at Empirical Generalizations,” Marketing Science14 (3, Part 2), G61–G70.
28.
NaertPhilippe and LeeflangPeter S.H. (1978), Building Implementable Marketing Models. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
29.
OrmeBryan K. (1998), Reducing the Number-of-Attribute-Levels Effect in ACA with Optimal Weighting. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.
30.
ReinmuthJames E. and WittinkDick R. (1974), “Recursive Models for Forecasting Seasonal Processes,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9 (September), 659–84.
31.
SirohiNiren, McLaughlinEdward M., and WittinkDick R. (1998), “A Model of Consumer Perceptions and Intentions for a Supermarket Retailer,” Journal of Retailing, 74 (Summer), 223–45.
32.
SrinivasanV., WittinkDick R., and ZweigBruce M. (1981), “Decision Aids for MBA Program Admissions: Predicting Academic Performance,” Research Paper No. 610, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
33.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. and WittinkDick R. (1994), “The Metric Quality of Full Profile Judgments and the Number-of-Levels Effect in Conjoint Analysis,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11 (June), 275–86.
34.
Van HeerdeHarald J., GuptaSachin, and WittinkDick R. (2003), “Is 75% of the Sales Promotion Bump Due to Brand Switching? No, Only 33% Is,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (November), 481–91.
35.
Van HeerdePeter S.H. Leeflang, and WittinkDick R. (2000), “The Estimation of Pre- and Postpromotion Dips with Store-Level Scanner Data,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (August), 383–95.
36.
Van HeerdePeter S.H. Leeflang, and WittinkDick R. (2001), “Semiparametric Analysis of the Deal Effect Curve,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (May), 197–215.
37.
Van HeerdePeter S.H. Leeflang, and WittinkDick R. (2002), “How Promotions Work: Evolutionary Model Building of SCAN*PRO,” Schmalenbach Business Review, 54 (July), 198–220.
38.
Van HeerdePeter S.H. Leeflang, and WittinkDick R. (2005), “Decomposing the Sales Promotion Bump with Store Data,” Marketing Science, forthcoming.
39.
VerleghPeeter W., SchiffersteinHendrik N.J., and WittinkDick R. (2002), “Range and Numbers-of-Levels Effects in Derived and Stated Measures of Attribute Importance,” Marketing Letters, 13 (1), 41–52.
40.
WittinkDick R. (1977), “Exploring Territorial Differences in the Relationship Between Marketing Variables,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (May), 145–55.
41.
WittinkDick R. (1991), “Attribute Level Effects in Conjoint Results: The Problem and Possible Solutions,” in First Annual Advanced Research Techniques Forum Proceedings, NealWilliam D., ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 44–55.
42.
WittinkDick R. (2001), “Market Measurement and Analysis: The First Marketing Science Conference,” Marketing Science, 20 (Fall), 349–56.
43.
WittinkDick R., AddonaMichael, HawkesWilliam, and PorterJohn C. (1988), “SCAN*PRO: The Estimation, Validation, and Use of Promotional Effects Based on Scanner Data,” working paper, Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University.
44.
WittinkDick R. and CattinPhilippe (1981), “Alternative Estimation Methods for Conjoint Analysis: A Monte Carlo Study,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 101–106.
45.
WittinkDick R., HuberJoel C., FiedlerJohn A., and MillerRichard L. (1992), “Attribute Level Effects in Conjoint Revisited: ACA Versus Full Profile,” in Second Annual Advanced Research Techniques Forum Proceedings,” MoraRene, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 52–61.
46.
WittinkDick R. and KeilSev K. (2000), “Continuous Conjoint Analysis,” in Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications, GustaffsonAnders, HerrmannAndreas, and HuberFrank, eds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 411–34.
47.
WittinkDick R., KrishnamurthiLakshman, and NutterJulia B. (1982), “Comparing Derived Importance Weights Across Attributes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (March), 471–74.
48.
WittinkDick R., KrishnamurthiLakshman, and ReibsteinDavid J. (1990), “The Effect of Differences in the Number of Attribute Levels on Conjoint Results,” Marketing Letters, 1 (2), 113–23.
49.
WittinkDick R., ReibsteinDavid J., BouldingWilliam, BatesonJohn E.G., and WalshJohn W. (1989), “Conjoint Reliability Measures,” Marketing Science, 8 (Fall), 371–74.