Despite the high relevance of firms’ portfolios of upstream interfirm agreements in technology-intensive markets, little is known about their impact on innovative success. The authors develop a conceptual framework that explains the consequences of different portfolio descriptors for radical innovation, incremental innovation, and profitability. An empirical test in the pharmaceutical industry shows strong support for the developed theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchrolRavi S. (1997), “Changes in the Theory of Interorganizational Relations in Marketing: Toward a Network Paradigm,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (1), 56–71.
2.
AhujaGautam (2000), “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (3), 425–55.
3.
AnandBharat N., and KhannaTarun (2000), “Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances,”Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 295–315.
4.
BadaraccoJ.L.Jr. (1991), The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliances.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
5.
BamfordJames, and ErnstDavid (2002), “Managing an Alliance Portfolio,”The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 29–39.
6.
BaumJoel A.C., CalabreseTony, and SilvermanBrian (2000), “Don't Go It Alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startups’ Performance in Canadian Biotechnology,”Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 267–94.
7.
ChandyRajesh K., and TellisGerard J. (1998), “Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize,”Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (November), 474–87.
8.
ChandyRajesh K., and TellisGerard J. (2000), “The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation,”Journal of Marketing, 64 (July), 1–17.
9.
CohenWesley M., and LevinRichard C. (1989), “Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure,” in Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, SchmalenseeR., and WilligR.D., eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B V, 1059–61.
10.
CohenWesley M., and LevinRichard C., and LevinthalDaniel A. (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–52.
DewarRobert D., and DuttonJane E. (1986), “The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis,”Management Science, 32 (11), 1422–33.
13.
DuttaShantanu, NarasimhanOm, and RajivSurendra (1999), “Success in High-Technology Markets: Is Marketing Capability Critical?”Marketing Science, 18 (4), 547–68.
14.
DuttaShantanu, NarasimhanOm, and RajivSurendra, and WeissAllen M. (1997), “The Relationship Between a Firm's Level of Technological Innovativeness and Its Pattern of Partnership Agreements,”Management Science, 43 (3), 343–56.
15.
EnríquezJuan (1998), “Genomics and the World's Economy,”Science, 281 (August), 925–26.
FichmanRobert G., and KemererChris F. (1997), “The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning Perspective,”Management Science, 43 (10), 1345–63.
18.
GarciaRosanna, and CalantoneRoger (2003), “How Much ‘R'and How Much ‘D’ Is Required for New Product Development Success in Competitive Environments? An Agent-Based Modeling Approach,” Working Paper v3.1, Marketing Group, College of Business Administration, Northeastern University.
19.
GarciaRosanna, and CalantoneRoger, and LevineRalph (2003), “The Role of Knowledge in Resource Allocation to Exploration Versus Exploitation in Technologically Oriented Organizations,”Decision Sciences, 34 (2), 323–49.
20.
GatignonHubert, and XuerebJean-Marc (1997), “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (February), 77–90.
21.
GeroskiPaul, MachinSteve, and Van ReenenJohn (1993), “The Profitability of Innovating Firms,”RAND Journal of Economics, 24 (Summer), 198–212.
22.
GlazerRashi (1991), “Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset,”Journal of Marketing, 55 (October), 1–19.
23.
GlazerRashi, and WeissAllen M. (1993), “Marketing in Turbulent Environments: Decision Processes and the Time Sensitivity of Information,”Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (November), 509–521.
24.
Gomes-CasseresBenjamin (1998), “Do You Really Have an Alliance Strategy?”Strategy and Leadership, 26 (4), 6–11.
25.
GranovetterMark (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,”American Journal of Sociology, 78 (May), 1360–80.
26.
GraysonKent, and AmblerTim (1999), “The Dark Side of Long-Term Relationships in Marketing Services,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (1), 132–41.
27.
GriffinAbbie, and HauserJohn R. (1993), “The Voice of the Customer,”Marketing Science, 12 (1), 1–27.
28.
GrilichesZvi (1990), “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey,”Journal of Economic Literature, 28 (4), 1661–1707.
29.
GulatiRanjay (1999), “Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?”American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5), 1439–93.
HåkanssonLars (1993), “Managing Co-operative Research and Development: Partner Selection and Contract Design,”R&D Management, 23 (4), 273–85.
32.
HallBronwyn H., JaffeAdam B., and TrajtenbergManuel (2001), “Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look,” Working Paper No. 7741, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research.
33.
HansenMorton T. (1999), “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (1), 82–111.
34.
HendersonRebecca, and CockburnIain (1994), “Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research,”Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Special Issue), 63–84.
35.
HumphreysAndrew (2002), “Marketer of the Year: Pfizer—Touched by Pfizer—This Firm Turns Drugs into Highly Successful Brands,”Med Ad News, 21 (March), 1.
36.
IansitiMarco, and WestJonathan (1997), “Technology Integration: Turning Great Research into Great Products,”Harvard Business Review, 75 (3), 69–79.
37.
JohnGeorge, WeissAllen M., and DuttaShantanu (1999), “Marketing in Technology-Intensive Markets: Toward a Conceptual Framework,”Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 78–91.
38.
KatilaRiitta, and AhujaGautam (2002), “Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction,”Academy of Management Journal, 45 (6), 1183–94.
39.
KotlerPhilip, JainDipak C., and MaesinceeSuvit (2002), Marketing Moves—A New Approach to Profits, Growth, and Renewal.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
40.
Leonard-BartonDorothy (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development,”Strategic Management Journal, 13 (Special Issue), 111–25.
41.
LevinthalDaniel A., and MarchJames G. (1993), “The Myopia of Learning,”Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Special Issue), 95–112.
42.
MadhavenRavindranath, and GroverRajiv (1998), “From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management,”Journal of Marketing, 62 (October), 1–12.
43.
MarchJames G. (1991), “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,”Organization Science, 2 (Special Issue), 71–87.
44.
MoormanChristine (1995), “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (August), 318–35.
45.
MoormanChristine, and MinerAnne S. (1997), “The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (February), 91–106.
46.
MoormanChristine, and MinerAnne S., and SlotegraafRebecca J. (1999), “The Contingency Value of Complementary Capabilities in Product Development,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (May), 239–57.
47.
ParsonsLeonard Jon, and AbeelePiet Vanden (1983), “Analysis of Sales Call Effectiveness,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 107–113.
48.
PisanoGary P. (1990), “The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 153–76.
49.
PolanyiMichael (1966), The Tacit Dimension.New York: Anchor Day Books.
50.
PowellWalter W., KoputKenneth W., and Smith-DoerrLaurel (1996), “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (March), 116–45.
51.
RindfleischAric, and MoormanChristine (2001), “The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective,”Journal of Marketing, 65 (April), 1–18.
52.
RobertsMichael J. (2001), Guidant: Radiation Therapy.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
53.
RowleyTim, BehrensDean, and KrackhardtDavid (2000), “Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries,”Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 369–86.
54.
SchumpeterJoseph (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy.New York: Harper.
ShanWeijan G., WalkerGordon, and KogutBruce (1994), “Inter-firm Cooperation and Startup Innovation in the Biotechnology Industry,”Strategic Management Journal, 15 (5), 387–94.
57.
SinkulaJames M. (1994), “Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (January), 35–45.
58.
SivadasEugene, and DwyerF. Robert (2000), “An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (January), 31–49.
59.
SlowinskiGene (2001), “Becoming the Partner of Choice,”Pharmaceutical Executive, 21 (12), 52–56.
60.
SternLouis W. (1996), “Relationships, Networks, and the Three Cs,” in Networks in Marketing, IacobucciDawn, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 3–7.
61.
StumpRodney L., and HeideJan B. (1996), “Controlling Supplier Opportunism in Industrial Relationships,”Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (November), 431–41.
62.
TatikondaMohan V., and Montoya-WeissMitzi M. (2001), “Integrating Operations and Marketing Perspectives of Product Innovation: The Influence of Organizational Process Factors and Capabilities on Development Performance,”Management Science, 47 (1), 151–72.
63.
TrajtenbergM. (1990), “A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations,”RAND Journal of Economics, 21 (1), 172–87.
64.
TushmanMichael L., and AndersonPhilip (1986), “Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (3), 439–65.
65.
UzziBrian (1997), “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1), 35–67.
WindJerry, and MahajanVijay (1997), “Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (February), 1–12.
68.
ZuckerLynne G., DarbyMichael R., and ArmstrongJeff S. (2002), “Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology,”Management Science, 48 (1), 138–53.
69.
ZuckerLynne G., DarbyMichael R., and ArmstrongJeff S., and BrewerMarilynn B. (1994), “Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises,” Working Paper No. 4653, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research.
