Marketing strategists who operate in turbulent markets face a competitive landscape marked by volatility and evolving market structures. As customer requirements change, an organization that stays in alignment with its markets will form new business units or alter the market charters of existing business units. In a longitudinal study, the authors traced the structural realignments that accompanied a Fortune-500 firm's entry into the Internet market. As the charter moved from a freshly created unit to an established business unit, the authors found support for the prediction that the former organizational structure will continue to shape the identity, beliefs, and social ties of managers. The study highlights the structural, social, and cognitive factors that must be managed as corporate decision makers search for the best strategy–structure fit for an emerging market opportunity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbellDerek F. (1980), Defining the Business: The Starting Point of Strategic Planning.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
AlbertStuart, and WhettenDavid A. (1985), “Organizational Identity,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, CummingsL.L., and StawBarry M., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 262–95.
3.
AnconaDeborah G., and CaldwellDavid F. (1992), “Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 (December), 634–65.
4.
AndersonPaul F. (1982), “Marketing, Strategic Planning, and the Theory of the Firm,”Journal of Marketing, 46 (Spring), 15–26.
5.
AshforthBlake E., and JohnsonScott A. (2001), “Which Hat to Wear? The Relative Salience of Multiple Identities in Organizational Contexts,” in Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts, HoggM.A., and TerryD.J., eds. Philadelphia: Psychology Press (in press).
6.
AshforthBlake E., and MaelFred (1989), “Social Identity Theory and the Organization,”Academy of Management Review, 14 (January), 20–39.
7.
AshforthBlake E., and MaelFred (1996), “Organizational Identity and Strategy as a Context for the Individual,” in Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 13, BaumJoel A.C., and DuttonJane E., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 19–64.
8.
BatraRajeev, and RayMichael L. (1986), “Affective Responses Mediating Acceptance of Advertising,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (September), 234–49.
9.
BhattacharyaC.B., RaoHayagreeva, and GlynnMary Ann (1995), “Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of Its Correlates Among Art Museum Members,”Journal of Marketing, 59 (October), 46–57.
10.
BiggadikeE. Ralph (1981), “The Contribution of Marketing to Strategic Management,”Academy of Management Review, 6 (August), 621–32.
11.
BrassDaniel J., and BurkhardtMarlene E. (1993), “Potential Power and Power Use: An Investigation of Structure and Behavior,”Academy of Management Journal, 36 (June), 441–70.
12.
BrownShona L., and EisenhardtKathleen M. (1997), “The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (March), 1–42.
13.
BrownShona L., and EisenhardtKathleen M. (1998), Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14.
BurgelmanRobert A. (1991), “Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research,”Organization Science, 6 (August), 239–62.
15.
ChristensenClayton M., and BowerJoseph L. (1996), “Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms,”Strategic Management Journal, 17 (March), 197–218.
16.
CravensDavid W. (1997), Strategic Marketing.Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.
17.
DaftRichard L., and WeickKarl E. (1984), “Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretive Systems,”Academy of Management Review, 9 (April), 284–95.
18.
DayGeorge S. (1984), Strategic Marketing Planning: The Pursuit of Competitive Advantage.St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
19.
DayGeorge S. (1992), “Marketing's Contribution to the Strategic Dialogue,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20 (Fall), 323–29.
20.
DayGeorge S. (1997), “Aligning the Organization to the Market,” in Reflections on the Future of Marketing, LehmannDonald R., and JoczKatherine E., eds. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 67–96.
21.
DicksonPeter Reid (1992), “Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality,”Journal of Marketing, 56 (January), 69–83.
22.
DoughertyDeborah (1990), “Understanding New Markets for New Products,”Strategic Management Journal, 11 (Summer), 59–78.
23.
DoughertyDeborah (1992), “Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms,”Organization Science, 3 (May), 179–202.
24.
DuttonJane E. (1993), “The Making of Organizational Opportunities: An Interpretive Pathway to Organizational Change,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 15, StawBarry M., and CummingsL.L., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 195–226.
25.
DuttonJane E., and DukerichJanet M. (1991), “Keeping an Eye on the Mirror: The Role of Image and Identity in Organizational Adaptation,”Academy of Management Journal, 34 (September), 517–54.
26.
DuttonJane E., and DukerichJanet M., and HarquailCelia V. (1994), “Organizational Images and Member Identification,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (June), 239–63.
27.
EisenhardtKathleen M., and BrownShona L. (1999), “Patching: Restitching Business Portfolios in Dynamic Markets,”Harvard Business Review, 77 (May/June), 72–82.
28.
EisenhardtKathleen M., and GalunicD. Charles (2000), “Coevolving: At Last, A Way to Make Synergies Work,”Harvard Business Review, 78 (January/February), 91–101.
29.
FiolC. Marlene (1991), “Managing Culture as a Competitive Resource: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage,”Journal of Management, 17 (March), 191–211.
30.
FisherRobert J., MaltzElliot, and JaworskiBernard J. (1997), “Enhancing Communication Between Marketing and Engineering: The Moderating Role of Relative Functional Identity,”Journal of Marketing, 61 (July), 54–70.
31.
FrankwickGary L., WardJames C., HuttMichael D., and ReingenPeter H. (1994), “Evolving Patterns of Organizational Beliefs in the Formation of Strategy,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (April), 96–110.
32.
GalunicD. Charles, and EisenhardtKathleen M. (1994), “Renewing the Strategy–Structure–Performance Paradigm,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16, StawB.M., and CummingsL.L., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 215–55.
33.
GalunicD. Charles, and EisenhardtKathleen M. (1996), “The Evolution of Intracorporate Domains: Divisional Charter Losses in High-Technology, Multidivisional Corporations,”Organization Science, 7 (May/June), 255–82.
34.
GalunicD. Charles, and RodanSimon (1998), “Resource Recombinations in the Firm: Knowledge Structures and the Potential for Schumpeterion Innovation,”Strategic Management Journal, 19 (December), 1193–201.
35.
GioiaDennis A., and ThomasJames B. (1996), “Image, Identity, and Issue Interpretation: Sensemaking During Strategic Change in Academia,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (September), 370–403.
36.
GriffinAbbie, and HauserJohn R. (1996), “Integrating R&D and Marketing: A Review and Analysis of the Literature,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13 (May), 191–215.
37.
GuptaAnil K., and GovindarajanVijay (1986), “Resource Sharing Among SBUs: Strategic Antecedents and Administrative Implications,”Academy of Management Journal, 29 (December), 695–714.
38.
HannanMichael T., and FreemanJohn (1984), “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change,”American Sociological Review, 49 (April), 149–64.
39.
HillCharles W.L., HittMichael A., and HoskissonRobert E. (1992), “Cooperative Versus Competitive Structures in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms,”Organization Science, 3 (November), 501–21.
40.
HodgkinsonGerald P. (1997), “Cognitive Inertia in a Turbulent Market: The Case of UK Residential Real Estate Agents,”Journal of Management Studies, 34 (November), 921–45.
41.
HomburgChristian, WorkmanJohn P., and KrohmerHarley (1999), “Marketing's Influence Within the Firm,”Journal of Marketing, 63 (April), 1–17.
42.
HuttMichael D., WalkerBeth A., and FrankwickGary L. (1995), “Hurdle the Cross-Functional Barriers to Strategic Change,”Sloan Management Review, 36 (Spring), 22–30.
43.
KaplanSoren M. (1999), “Discontinuous Innovation and the Growth Paradox,”Strategy & Leadership, 27 (March/April), 16–21.
44.
KeatingScott A. (1997), “Determinants of Divisional Performance Evaluation Practices,”Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (December), 243–73.
45.
KramerRoderick M. (1991), “Intergroup Relations and Organizational Dilemmas: The Role of Categorization Processes,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, CummingsL.L., and StawBarry M., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 191–228.
46.
Leonard-BartonDorothy (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities in Managing New Products,”Strategic Management Journal, 13 (Summer), 111–25.
47.
MaelFred, and AshforthBlake E. (1992), “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification,”Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13 (March), 103–23.
48.
MarkidesConstantinos C., and WilliamsonPeter J. (1996), “Corporate Diversification and Organizational Structure: A Resource-Based View,”Academy of Management Journal, 39 (April), 340–67.
49.
MillerDanny, and FriesenPeter H. (1980), “Archetypes of Organizational Transitions,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 25 (June), 268–99.
MoormanChristine, and MinerAnne S. (1998), “The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development,”Journal of Marketing, 62 (July), 1–20.
52.
PerreaultWilliam D.Jr., and LeighLawrence E. (1989), “Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (May), 135–48.
53.
PettigrewAndrew M., and WhippRichard (1991), Managing Change for Competitive Success.Oxford: Blackwell.
54.
PorterMichael E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors.New York: The Free Press.
55.
PrahaladC.K. (1995), “Weak Signals Versus Strong Paradigms,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (August), iii–vi.
56.
QuinnJames B. (1980), Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
57.
RegerRhonda K., and PalmerTimothy B. (1996), “Managerial Categorization of Competitors: Using Old Maps to Navigate New Environments,”Organization Science, 7 (January/February), 22–39.
58.
RosaJosé Antonio, PoracJoseph F., Runser-SpanjolJelena, and SaxonMichael S. (1999), “Sociocognitive Dynamics in a Product Market,”Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 64–77.
59.
TajfelHenri, and TurnerJohn C. (1985), “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior,” in Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Vol. 2, WorchelSteven, and AustinWilliam G., eds. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 7–24.
60.
TsuiAnne S. (1994), “Reputational Effectiveness: Toward a Mutual Response Framework,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16, StawBarry M., and CummingsL.L., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 257–307.
61.
TushmanMichael L., and RomanelliElaine (1985), “Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorganization,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7, StawBarry M., and CummingsL.L., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 171–222.
62.
Van de VenAndrew H. (1992), “Suggestions for Studying Strategy Process: A Research Note,”Strategic Management Journal, 13 (Summer), 169–88.
63.
VaradarajanP. Rajan (1992), “Marketing's Contribution to the Strategic Dialogue: The View from a Different Looking Glass,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20 (Fall), 335–44.
64.
VaradarajanP. Rajan, and ClarkTerry (1994), “Delineating the Scope of Corporate, Business, and Marketing Strategy,”Journal of Business Research, 31 (October), 93–105.
65.
VaradarajanP. Rajan, and JayachandranSatish (1999), “Marketing Strategy: An Assessment of the State of the Field and Outlook,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (Spring), 120–43.
66.
WalkerGordon (1985), “Network Position and Cognition in a Computer Software Firm,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 30 (March), 103–30.
67.
WalkerOrville C.Jr., RuekertRobert W., and RoeringKenneth J. (1987), “Picking Proper Paradigms: Alternative Perspectives on Organizational Behavior and Their Implications for Marketing Management Research,” in Review of Marketing, HoustonMichael J., ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 3–36.
68.
WebsterFrederick E.Jr. (1997), “The Future Role of Marketing in the Organization,” in Reflections on the Future of Marketing, LehmannDonald R., and JoczKatherine E., eds. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 39–66.
69.
WeickKarl (1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing.Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
70.
WorkmanJohn P.Jr. (1993), “Marketing's Limited Role in New Product Development in One Computer Systems Firm,”Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (November), 405–21.
71.
WorkmanJohn P.Jr., HomburgChristian, and GrunerKjell (1998), “Marketing Organization: An Integrative Framework of Dimensions and Determinants,”Journal of Marketing, 62 (July), 21–41.
