ArmstrongJ. Scott and SchultzRandall (1993), “Principles Involving Marketing Policies: An Empirical Assessment,” Marketing Letters, 4 (3), 253–65.
2.
BosterFranklin J. and MongeauPaul (1984), “Fear-Arousing Persuasive Messages,” in Communications Yearbook 8, BostromRobert N., ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 330–75.
3.
DukeJ.D. (1967), “Critique of the Janis and Feshbach Study,” Journal of Social Psychology, 72 (July), 71–80.
4.
FerrellO.C. (1998), “The History of Marketing Principles Textbooks,” paper distributed and presented at Academy of Marketing Science annual conference, Norfolk, VA (May 28–30).
5.
GoldbergSteven (1996), “The Erosion of the Social Sciences,” in Dumbing Down: Essays in the Strip Mining of American Culture, WashburnKatherine and ThorntonJohn F., eds. New York: W . W . Norton & Company, 97–114.
6.
GouldStephen Jay (1985), The Flamingo's Smile: Reflections in Natural History. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
7.
GouldStephen Jay (1996), The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
8.
HigbeeK.L. (1969), “Fifteen Years of Fear Arousal: Research on Threat Appeals: 1953–1968,” Psychological Bulletin, 72 (6), 426–44.
9.
JanisIrving L. (1968), “When Fear Is Healthy,” Psychology Today, 1 (April), 46–48, 60, 61.
10.
JanisIrving L. and FeshbachS. (1953), “Effects of Fear-Arousing Communications,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48 (January), 78–92.
11.
JanisIrving L. and FeshbachS. (1954), “Personality Differences Associated with Responsiveness to Fear-Arousing Communications,” Journal of Personality, 23 (December), 154–66.
12.
KellerPunam Anand and BlockLauren Goldberg (1996), “Increasing the Persuasiveness of Fear Appeals: The Effect of Arousal and Elaboration,” Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (March), 448–59.
13.
LeventhalHoward (1967), “Fear—For Your Health,” Psychology Today, 1 (September), 54–58.
14.
RayMichael L. and WilkieWilliam L. (1970), “Fear: The Potential of an Appeal Neglected by Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 32 (January), 54–62.
15.
RotfeldHerbert J. (1988), “Fear Appeals and Persuasion: Assumptions and Errors in Advertising Research,” Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 11 (1), 21–40.
16.
RotfeldHerbert J. (1999), “The ICOM Offense,” Marketing Educator, 18 (Winter), 6.
SpenceH. and MoinpourR. (1972), “Fear Appeals in Marketing: A Social Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 36 (July), 39–43.
19.
SternthalBrian and CraigC. Samuel (1974), “Fear Appeals Revisited and Revised,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (November), 22–34.
20.
StiglerGeorge J. (1985), Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist. New York: Basic Books.
21.
StrongJames T. and DubasKhalid M. (1993), “The Optimal Level of Fear Arousal in Advertising: An Empirical Study,” Journal of Current Issues of Research in Advertising, 15 (Fall), 93–99.
22.
SuttonStephen R. (1982), “Fear-Arousing Communications: A Critical Examination of Theory and Research,” in Social Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, EiserJ. Richard, ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 303–37.
23.
SuttonStephen R. (1992), “Shock Tactics and the Myth of the Inverted U,” British Journal of Addiction, 87 (April), 517–19.
24.
WheatleyJohn J. (1971), “Marketing and the Use of Fear or Anxiety Arousing Appeals,” Journal of Marketing, 35 (April), 62–64.