Well-known brands are frequently imitated, misused, or tampered with. Firms facing these threats routinely turn to the legal system and file trademark infringement lawsuits in an attempt to prevent revenue losses and brand equity dilution. In this article, the authors address the largely unexplored issue of brand protection. First, they categorize all major types of trademark infringement. Second, using signaling and prospect theories, they present a conceptual model that outlines the financial consequences of defending a brand in court. The authors test the predictions of this framework using a large sample of trademark infringement lawsuits and find that although investors react negatively in the short term to firms’ filing and even to firms’ winning such cases, the long-term performance of firms that successfully leverage the legal system to protect their brands is positive.
AakerDavid A., and JoachimsthalerErich (2000), “The Brand Relationship Spectrum: The Key to the Brand Architecture Challenge,”California Management Review, 42(4), 8–23.
2.
AlmelingDavid S. (2006), “The Infringement-Plus-Equity Model: A Better Way to Award Monetary Relief in Trademark Cases,”Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 14(2), 205–36.
3.
American Intellectual Property Law Association (2013), Report of the Economic Survey.Arlington, VA: American Intellectual Property Law Association.
4.
AribargAnocha, AroraNeeraj, HendersonTy, and KimYoungju (2014), “Private Label Imitation of a National Brand: Implications for Consumer Choice and Law,”Journal of Marketing Research, 51(December), 657–75.
BBY Solutions Inc. et al. v. Leather Expo Inc. et al. (2011), 2:10-cv-09458.
7.
BenartziShlomo, and ThalerRichard H. (1995), “Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73–92.
8.
BestArthur (1987), “Monetary Damages for False Advertising,”University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 49(1), 1–42.
9.
BeVierLillian R. (1992), “Competitor Suits for False Advertising Under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act: A Puzzle in the Law of Deception,”Virginia Law Review, 78(1), 1–48.
10.
BhagatSanjai, BizjakJohn, and ColesJeffrey L. (1998), “The Shareholder Wealth Implications of Corporate Lawsuits,”Financial Management, 27(4), 5–27.
11.
BhagatSanjai, BrickleyJames A., and ColesJeffrey L. (1994), “The Costs of Inefficient Bargaining and Financial Distress: Evidence from Corporate Lawsuits,”Journal of Financial Economics, 35(2), 221–47.
12.
BhagatSanjai, and UmeshU.N. (1997), “Do Trademark Infringement Lawsuits Affect Brand Value? A Stock Market Perspective,”Journal of Market Focused Management, 2(2), 127–48.
13.
BizjakJohn M., and ColesJeffrey L. (1995), “The Effect of Private Antitrust Litigation on the Stock-Market Valuation of the Firm,”American Economic Review, 85(3), 436–61.
BoydD. Eric, ChandyRajesh K., and CunhaMarcusJr., (2010), “When Do Chief Marketing Officers Affect Firm Value? A Customer Power Explanation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1162–76.
16.
BravAlon, and HeatonJohn B. (2002), “Competing Theories of Financial Anomalies,”Review of Financial Studies, 15(2), 575–606.
17.
BrennanMichael J., and XiaYihong (2001), “Assessing Asset Pricing Anomalies,”Review of Financial Studies, 14(4), 905–42.
18.
CaoZixia, and SorescuAlina (2013), “Wedded Bliss or Tainted Love? Stock Market Reactions to the Introduction of Cobranded Products,”Marketing Science, 32(6), 939–59.
19.
CesareoLudovica, and StöttingerBarbara (2015), “United We Stand, Divided We Fall: How Firms Can Engage Consumers in Their Fight Against Counterfeits,”Business Horizons, 58(5), 527–37.
20.
ChaudhryPeggy E., and StumpfStephen A. (2011), “Consumer Complicity with Counterfeit Products,”Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(2), 139–51.
21.
ChaudhryPeggy E., and ZimmermanAlan (2013), “The Global Growth of Counterfeit Trade,” in Protecting Your Intellectual Property Rights, BenkoR., ed. New York: Springer, 7–31.
22.
ChenYubo, GanesanShankar, and LiuYong (2009), “Does a Firm's Product-Recall Strategy Affect Its Financial Value? An Examination of Strategic Alternatives During Product-Harm Crises,”Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 214–26.
23.
ChenYubo, LiuYong, and ZhangJurui (2012), “When Do Third-Party Product Reviews Affect Firm Value and What Can Firms Do? The Case of Media Critics and Professional Movie Reviews,”Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 116–34.
24.
Church & Dwight Co. Inc. v. Clorox Company (2012), 1:11-cv-01865.
25.
CohenDorothy (1991), “Trademark Strategy Revisited,”Journal of Marketing, 55(3), 46–59.
26.
Collins-DoddColleen, and ZaichkowskyJudy L. (1999), “National Brand Responses to Brand Imitation: Retailers Versus Other Manufacturers,”Journal of Product and Brand Management, 8(2), 96–105.
27.
CommuriSuraj (2009), “The Impact of Counterfeiting on Genuine Item Consumers’ Brand Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 86–98.
28.
Conway-JonesDanielle (2002), “Remedying Trademark Infringement: The Role of Bad Faith in Awarding an Accounting of Defendant's Profits,”Santa Clara Law Review, 42, 863–927.
29.
CorgillDennis S. (1996), “Measuring the Gains of Trademark Infringement.,” Fordham LawReview, 65, 1909–85.
30.
DhaliwalAmrita (2016), “Determinants Affecting Consumer Behaviour with Regard to Counterfeit Products,”International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 4(6), 4243–49.
31.
DuhanDale F., and SheffetMary Jane (1988), “Gray Markets and the Legal Status of Parallel Importation,”Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 75–83.
32.
EilertMeike, JayachandranSatish, KalaignanamKartik, and SwartzTracey A. (2017), “Does It Pay to Recall Your Product Early? An Empirical Investigation in the Automobile Industry,”Journal of Marketing, 81(May), 111–29.
33.
EisendMarin, and Schuchert-GülerPakize (2006), “Explaining Counterfeit Purchases: A Review and Preview,”Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2006(12), 1–25.
34.
Eli Lilly and Company v. Nelson et al. (2013), 1:13-cv-01800.
35.
EpsteinLarry G., and SchneiderMartin (2008), “Ambiguity, Information Quality, and Asset Pricing,”Journal of Finance, 63(1), 197–228.
36.
FangEric, LeeJongkuk, PalmatierRobert, and GuoZhaoyang (2016), “Understanding the Effects of Plural Marketing Structures on Alliance Performance,”Journal of Marketing Research, 53(4), 628–45.
37.
FangEric, LeeJongkuk, and YangZhi (2015), “The Timing of Codevelopment Alliances in New Product Development Processes: Returns for Upstream and Downstream Partners,”Journal of Marketing, 79(1), 64–82.
38.
Federal Express Corporation v. JetEx Management Services, Inc. (2014), 2:09-cv-02269.
39.
GermannFrank, EbbesPeter, and GrewalRajdeep (2015), “The Chief Marketing Officer Matters!”Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 1–22.
40.
GeyskensInge, GielensKatrijn, and DekimpeMarnik G. (2002), “The Market Valuation of Internet Channel Additions,”Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 102–19.
41.
GielensKatrijn, van de GuchtLinda M., SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., and DekimpeMarnik G. (2008), “Dancing with a Giant: The Effect of Wal-Mart's Entry into the United Kingdom on the Performance of European Retailers,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45(5), 519–34.
42.
GillManpreet, SridharShrihari, and GrewalRajdeep (2017), “Return on Engagement Initiatives: A Study of a Business-to-Business Mobile App,”Journal of Marketing, 81(4), 45–66.
GroeningChristopher, MittalVikas, and ZhangYan “Anthea” (2016), “Cross-Validation of Customer and Employee Signals and Firm Valuation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 53(1), 61–76.
45.
HantlerSteven B., SchwartzVictor E., and GoldbergPhil S. (2004), “Extending the Privilege to Litigation Communications Specialists in the Age of Trial by Media,”CommLaw Conspectus, 13, 7–34.
46.
HealdPaul (1988), “Money Damages and Corrective Advertising: An Economic Analysis,”University of Chicago Law Review, 55(2), 629–58.
47.
HeckmanJ. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,”Econometrica, 47(January), 153–61.
48.
HomburgChristian, VollmayrJosef, and HahnAlexander (2014), “Firm Value Creation Through Major Channel Expansions: Evidence from an Event Study in the United States, Germany, and China,”Journal of Marketing, 78(May), 38–61.
49.
H-D Michigan, LLC et al. v. Ayala et al. (2011), 2:10-cv-01187.
50.
KellerKevin Lane, and LehmannDonald R. (2006), “Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities,”Marketing Science, 25(6), 740–59.
51.
KirmaniAmna, and RaoAkshay R. (2000), “No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality,”Journal of Marketing, 64(April), 66–79.
52.
KoppSteven W., and SuterTracy A. (2000), “Trademark Strategies Online: Implications for Intellectual Property Protection,”Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 119–31.
53.
KrasnikovAlexander, MishraSaurabh, and OrozcoDavid (2009), “Evaluating the Financial Impact of Branding Using Trademarks: A Framework and Empirical Evidence,”Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 154–66.
MizikNatalie (2014), “Assessing the Total Financial Performance Impact of Brand Equity with Limited Time-Series Data,”Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 691–706.
58.
MizikNatalie, and JacobsonRobert (2008), “The Financial Value Impact of Perceptual Brand Attributes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45(February), 15–32.
59.
NiaArghavan, and ZaichkowskyJudith Lynne (2000), “Do Counterfeits Devalue the Ownership of Luxury Brands?”Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(7), 485–97.
60.
ParkU. David, BorahAbhishek, and KothaSuresh (2016), “Signaling Revisited: The Use of Signals in the Market for IPOs,”Strategic Management Journal, 37 (November), 2362–77.
61.
PhauIan, and TeahMin (2009), “Devil Wears (Counterfeit) Prada: A Study of Antecedents and Outcomes of Attitudes Towards Counterfeits of Luxury Brands,”Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 15–27.
62.
PhelpsShirelle, and LehmanJeffrey (2005), West's Encyclopedia of American Law, 2nd ed., Vol. 8. Detroit: Gale.
63.
RaassensNéomie, WuytsStefan, and GeyskensInge (2012), “The Market Valuation of Outsourcing New Product Development,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 682–95.
64.
RaghuT.S., WooWonseok, MohanS.B., and Raghav RaoH. (2008), “Market Reaction to Patent Infringement Litigations in the Information Technology Industry,”Information Systems Frontiers, 10(1), 61–75.
65.
RossTerence P. (2000), Intellectual Property Law: Damages and Remedies.New York: Law Journal Press.
66.
RozinPaul, and RoyzmanEdward B. (2001), “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion,”Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.
67.
SatomuraTakuya, WedelMichel, and PietersRik (2014), “Copy Alert: A Method and Metric to Detect Visual Copycat Brands,”Journal of Marketing Research, 51(1), 1–13.
68.
ShleiferAndrei (2000), Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance.Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
69.
SorescuAlina B., ChandyRajesh K., and PrabhuJaideep C (2007), “Why Some Acquisitions Do Better Than Others: Product Capital as a Driver of Long-Term Stock Return,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44(February), 57–72.
70.
SorescuAlina B., WarrenNooshin L., and ErtekinLarisa (2017), “Event Study Methodology in the Marketing Literature: An Overview,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(2), 186–207.
71.
SpenceMichael (1973), “Job Market Signaling,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–74.
72.
StevensGregg, SubarLorin, and BurdgeRonald L. (2012), “Confidentiality in Settlement Agreements Point/Counterpoint,”GPSolo, 29(6), 24–29.
73.
SwaminathanVanitha, and MoormanChristine (2009), “Marketing Alliances, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation,”Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 52–69.
74.
SwaminathanVanitha, MurshedFeisal, and HullandJohn (2008), “Value Creation Following Merger and Acquisition Announcements: The Role of Strategic Emphasis Alignment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 33–47.
75.
TushnetRebecca (2011), “Running the Gamut from A to B: Federal Trademark and False Advertising Law,”University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 159(5), 1305–84.
76.
TverskyAmos, and KahnemanDaniel (1992), “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.
77.
Unilever Supply Chain, Inc. v. Koolpets Products, Inc. et al. (2011), 1:11-cv-03241.
Van HorenFemke, and PietersRik (2012), “When High-Similarity Copycats Lose and Moderate-Similarity Copycats Gain: The Impact of Comparative Evaluation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49(February), 83–91.
80.
WarlopLuk, and AlbaJoseph W. (2004), “Sincere Flattery: Trade-Dress Imitation and Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1/2), 21–27.
81.
WarrenNooshin, and SorescuAlina (2017), “Interpreting Returns to New Product Announcements: How the Past Shapes Investors’ Expectations of the Future,”Journal of Marketing Research, 54(5), 799–815.
82.
WilcoxKeith, KimHyeong Min, and SenSankar (2009), “Why Do Consumers Buy Counterfeit Luxury Brands?”Journal of Marketing Research, 46(April), 247–59.
83.
WilesMichael A., MorganNeil A., and RegoLopo L. (2012), “The Effect of Brand Acquisition and Disposal on Stock Returns,”Journal of Marketing, 76(January), 38–58.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
