Anthropomorphizing a brand (i.e., imbuing a brand with humanlike features) serves as an important brand positioning strategy for marketing managers. This research identifies a key brand anthropomorphization strategy—positioning a brand as either oriented to interact with consumers or not. Managers generally rely on this brand interaction strategy to enhance consumer brand engagement regardless of the social context. However, given that consumers often experience brands in a social context, this research demonstrates that social crowdedness moderates the positive impact of interaction-oriented anthropomorphized brands on consumer brand preferences. Specifically, the authors show that consumers’ inferences of an anthropomorphized brand's intentionality to interact with them in a socially crowded context trigger greater social withdrawal, thereby resulting in lower preferences for the brand. The authors further demonstrate that the core negative effect of social crowdedness is contingent on the type of crowding (goal-related vs. goal-unrelated). In particular, a goal-related crowding decreases social withdrawal reactions, which, in turn, leads to greater preferences for interaction-oriented anthropomorphized brands relative to brands with other positioning strategies. In contrast, the effect of social crowdedness on consumer preferences for interaction-oriented anthropomorphized brands remains negative in goal-unrelated crowded settings.
AakerJennifer L. (1997), “Dimensions of Brand Personality,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–56.
2.
AggarwalPankaj, and McGillAnn L. (2007), “Is This Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34(December), 468–79.
3.
AggarwalPankaj, and McGillAnn L. (2012), “When Brands Seem Human, Do Humans Act Like Brands? Automatic Behavioral Priming Effects of Brand Anthropomorphism,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 307–23.
4.
AhluwaliaRohini, and BurnkrantRobert E. (2004), “Answering Questions About Questions: A Persuasion Knowledge Perspective for Understanding the Effects of Rhetorical Questions,”journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 26–42.
5.
AielloJohn R., NieosiaGregory, and ThompsonDonna E. (1979), “Physiological, Social, and Behavioral Consequences of Crowding on Children and Adolescents,”Child Development, 50(1), 195–202.
6.
AltmanIrwin (1977), “Privacy Regulation: Culturally Universal or Culturally Specific?”Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 66–84.
7.
AltmanIrwin, and TaylorDalmas A. (1973), Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
8.
AronArthur, NormanChristina C, AronElaine N., McKennaColin, and HeymanRichard E. (2000), “Couples’ Shared Participation in Novel and Arousing Activities and Experienced Relationship Quality,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 273–84.
9.
BaumAndrew (1975), “Waiting for a Crowd: Behavioral and Perceptual Effects of Anticipated Crowding,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(4), 671–79.
10.
BaumAndrew, and KomanStuart (1976), “Differential Response to Anticipated Crowding: Psychological Effects of Social and Spatial Density,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 526–36.
11.
BaumAndrew, SingerJerome E., and BaumCarlene S. (1981), “Stress and the Environment,”Journal of Social Issues, 37(1), 4–35.
12.
BaumAndrew, and ValinsStuart (1979), “Architectural Mediation of Residential Density and Control: Crowding and the Regulation of Social Contact,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 12, BerkowitzLeonard, ed. Orlando, EL: Academic Press, 131–75.
13.
BerscheidEllen, SnyderMark, and OmotoAllen M. (1989), “The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 792–807.
BurgoonJudee K., and HaleJerold L. (1984), “The Fundamental Topoi of Relational Communication,”Communication Monographs, 51(September), 193–214.
16.
BurgoonJudee K., and HaleJerold L. (1987), “Validation and Measurement of the Fundamental Themes of Relational Communication,”Communication Monographs, 54(March), 20–41.
17.
DesorJ.A. (1972), “Toward a Psychological Theory of Crowding,”journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(1), 79–83.
18.
DooleyBraddie B. (1978), “Effects of Social Density on Men with ‘Close’ or ‘Far’ Personal Space,”Journal of Population, 1(3), 251–65.
19.
EpleyNicholas, WaytzAdam, and CacioppoJohn T. (2007), “On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism,”Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–86.
20.
ErogluSevgin, and MachleitKaren A. (1990), “An Empirical Study of Retail Crowding: Antecedents and Consequences,”Journal of Retailing, 66(2), 201–21.
21.
EvansGary W., RheeEunju, ForbesCamille, AllenKaren Mata, and LeporeStephen J. (2000), “The Meaning and Efficacy of Social Withdrawal as a Strategy for Coping with Chronic Residential Crowding,”Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(4), 335–42.
22.
FournierSusan (1998), “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–73.
23.
GouldingChristina, ShankarAvi, and ElliotRichard (2002), “Working Weeks, Rave Weekends: Identity Fragmentation and the Emergence of New Communities,”Consumption Markets & Culture, 5(4), 261–84.
24.
GramannJames H., and BurdgeRabel J. (1984), “Crowding Perception Determinants at Intensively Developed Outdoor Recreation Sites,”Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6(2), 167–86.
25.
HaleJerold L., BurgoonJudee K., and HouseholderBrian (2014), “The Relational Communication Scale,” in The Sourcebook of Nonverbal Measures: Going Beyond Words, ManusovV.L., ed. New York: Routledge, 127–39.
26.
HarrellGilbert D., HuttMichael D., and AndersonJames C. (1980), “Path Analysis of Buyer Behavior Under Conditions of Crowding,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(February), 45–51.
27.
HarristAmanda W., ZaiaAnthony F., BatesJohn E., DodgeKenneth A., and PettitGregory S. (1997), “Subtypes of Social Withdrawal in Early Childhood: Sociometric Status and Social-Cognitive Differences Across Four Years,”Child Development, 68(2), 278–94.
28.
HayesAndrew F. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach.New York: Guilford.
29.
HoltDouglas B. (1995), “How Consumers Consume: A Typology of Consumption Practices,”Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 1–16.
30.
HuiM.K., and BatesonJ.E. (1991), “Perceived Control and the Effects of Crowding and Consumer Choice on the Service Experience,”Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 174–84.
31.
HurJulia D., KooMinjung, and HofmanWilhelm (2015), “When Temptations Come Alive: How Anthropomorphism Undermines Self-Control,”Journal of Consumer Research, 42(August), 340–58.
32.
HwangJohye, YoonSo-Yeon, and BendleLawrence J. (2012), “Desired Privacy and the Impact of Crowding on Customer Emotions and Approach-Avoidance Responses: Waiting in a Virtual Reality Restaurant,”International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(2), 224–50.
33.
IlmarinenVille-Juhani, VainikainenMari-Pauliina, VerkasaloMarkku, and LönnqvistJan-Erik (2015), “Why Are Extraverts More Popular? Oral Fluency Mediates the Effect of Extraversion on Popularity in Middle Childhood,”European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 138–51.
34.
JeffreyPhillip, and MarkGloria (1998), “Constructing Social Spaces in Virtual Environments: A Study of Navigation and Interaction,” in Workshop on Personalised and Social Navigation in Information Space, HöökK., MunroA., and BenyonD., eds. Stockholm: Swedish Institute of Computer Science, 24–38.
KervynNicolas, FiskeSusan T., and MaloneChris (2012), “Brands as Intentional Agents Framework: How Perceived Intentions and Ability Can Map Brand Perception,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 166–76.
37.
KimHyeongmin(Christian), and KramerThomas (2015), “Do Materialists Prefer the ‘Brand-as-Servant’ ? The Interactive Effect of Anthropomorphized Brand Roles and Materialism on Consumer Responses,”Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 284–99.
38.
KwakHyokjin, PuzakovaMarina, and RoceretoJoseph F. (2015), “Better Not Smile at the Price: The Differential Role of Brand Anthropomorphization on Perceived Price Fairness,”Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 56–76.
39.
LearyMark R., HerbstKenneth C., and McCraryFelicia (2003), “Finding Pleasure in Solitary Activities: Desire for Aloneness or Disinterest in Social Contact?”Personality and Individual Differences, 35(1), 59–68.
40.
LevavJonathan, and ZhuRui (Juliet) (2009), “Seeking Freedom Through Variety,”Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (December), 600–10.
41.
LooChalsa M. (1979), “A Factor Analytic Approach to the Study of Spatial Density Effects on Preschoolers,”Journal of Population, 2(1), 47–68.
42.
LooChalsa, and OngPaul (1984), “Crowding Perceptions, Attitudes, and Consequences Among the Chinese,”Environment and Behavior, 16(1), 55–87.
43.
MachleitKaren A., ErogluSevgin A., and MantelS.P. (2000), “Perceived Retail Crowding and Shopping Satisfaction: What Modifies This Relationship?”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(1), 29–42.
44.
MacIntyrePeter D., BabinPatricia A., and ClementRichard (1999), “Willingness to Communicate: Antecedents & Consequences,”Communication Quarterly, 47(2), 215–29.
45.
MaengAhreum, TannerRobin J., and SomanDilip (2013), “Conservative when Crowded: Social Crowding and Consumer Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50(6), 739–52.
46.
MashekDebra J., and ShermanMichelle D. (2004), “Desiring Less Closeness with Intimate Others,” in Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy, MashekDebra J., AronArthur, eds. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 343–56.
47.
McCroskeyJames C., and RichmondVirginia P. (1990), “Willingness to Communicate: Differing Cultural Perspectives,”Southern Communication Journal, 56(1), 12–77.
48.
MillerStuart, and NardiniKathleen M. (1977), “Individual Differences in the Perception of Crowding,”Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 2(1), 3–13.
49.
PonsFrank, LarocheMichel, and MouraliMehdi (2006), “Consumer Reactions to Crowded Retail Settings: Cross-Cultural Differences Between North America and the Middle East,”Psychology and Marketing, 23(7), 555–72.
50.
PuzakovaMarina, KwakHyokjin, and RoceretoJoseph F. (2013), “When Humanizing Brands Goes Wrong: The Detrimental Effect of Brand Anthropomorphization Amid Product Wrongdoings,”Journal of Marketing, 11 (3), 81–100.
51.
RegoecziWendy C. (2008), “Crowding in Context: An Examination of the Differential Responses of Men and Women to High-Density Living Environments,”Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49(September), 254–68.
52.
RepettiRena L. (1989), “Effects of Daily Workload on Subsequent Behavior During Marital Interaction: The Roles of Social Withdrawal and Spouse Support,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 651–65.
53.
RomeroMarisabel, and CraigAdam W. (2017), “Costly Curves: How Human-Like Shapes Can Increase Spending,”Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 80–98.
54.
RubinK.H., and BurgessK. (2001), “Social Withdrawal,” in The Developmental Psychopathology of Anxiety, VaseyM.W., and DaddsM.R., eds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 407–34.
55.
SelaAner, Christian WheelerS., and Sarial-AbiGülen (2012), “We Are Not the Same as You and I: Causal Effects of Minor Language Variations on Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Brands,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39(October), 644–61.
56.
StokolsDaniel, RallMarilyn, PinnerBerna, and SchoplerJohn (1983), “Physical, Social, and Personal Determinants of the Perception of Crowding,”Environment and Behavior, 5(1), 87–115.
57.
ThomasPatricia A. (2011), “Trajectories of Social Engagement and Limitations in Late Life,”Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(4), 430–43.
UlrichRoger S., SimonsRobert F., LositoBarbara D., FioritoEvelyn, MilesMark A., and ZelsonMichael (1991), “Stress Recovery During Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments,”Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–30.
60.
ValinsStuart, and BaumAndrew (1973), “Residential Group Size, Social Interaction, and Crowding,”Environment and Behavior, 5(4), 421–39.
61.
VohsKathleen D., MeadNicole L., and GoodeMiranda R. (2006), “The Psychological Consequences of Money,”Science, 314(5802), 1154–56.
62.
WaltonGregory M., CohenGeoffrey L., CwirDavid, and SpencerSteven J. (2012), “Mere Belonging: The Power of Social Connections,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 513–32.
63.
WestoverTheresa N. (1989), “Perceived Crowding in Recreational Settings: An Environment-Behavior Model,”Environment and Behavior, 21(3), 258–76.
64.
WoodsideArch G. (1990), “Outdoor Advertising as Experiments,”journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(3), 229–37.
65.
WorchelStephen, and TeddlieCharles (1976), “The Experience of Crowding: A Two-Factor Theory,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(1), 30–40.
66.
XuJing, ShenHao, and WyerRobert S.Jr. (2012), “Does the Distance Between Us Matter? Influences of Physical Proximity to Others on Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 418–23.
67.
ZhuFeng, and ZhangXiaoquan (Michael) (2010), “Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (March), 133–48.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
