Firms’ boards of directors affect many strategic outcomes. Yet the impact of boards on new products, a key organizational adaptation mechanism, has been overlooked. Addressing this gap, the authors consider the effect of the firm's board interlock centrality, the extent to which board members are connected to boards of other firms, on its new product introductions. They propose that board interlock centrality provides firms access to market intelligence, creating opportunities to introduce incremental new products. Applying the motivation-opportunity-ability theory, the authors propose that two aspects of board leadership moderate this relationship: internal (vs. external) leadership and marketing leadership. They test the hypotheses using a panel of publicly listed U.S. consumer packaged goods firms, in which most new products are incremental innovations. As hypothesized, board interlock centrality increases new product introductions. This effect is stronger when firms have high internal leadership, internal marketing leadership, and a marketing CEO; it is weaker with high intra-industry external leadership. The findings highlight the unexpected role of board interlocks on innovation outcomes and advance the literature on marketing leadership, board interlocks, and social networks.
AndrewsMichelle, LuoXueming, FangZheng, and GhoseAnindya (2015), “Mobile Ad Effectiveness: Hyper-Contextual Targeting with Crowdedness,”Marketing Science, 35 (2), 218–33.
2.
BanburyCatherine M., and MitchellWill (1995), “The Effect of Introducing Important Incremental Innovations on Market Share and Business Survival,”Strategic Management Journal, 16 (S1), 161–82.
3.
BantelKaren A., and JacksonSusan E. (1989), “Top Management and Innovations in Banking: Does the Composition of the Top Team Make a Difference?”Strategic Management Journal, 10 (S1), 107–24.
4.
BeckmanChristine M., and HaunschildPamela R. (2002), “Network Learning: The Effects of Partners’ Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (1), 92–124.
5.
BonacichP., and LloydP. (2001), “Eigenvector-Like Measures of Centrality for Asymmetric Relations,”Social Networks, 23 (3), 191–201.
6.
BurtRonald S. (1997), “The Contingent Value of Social Capital,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (2), 339–65.
7.
CameronColin A., and TrivediPravin K. (2013), Regression Analysis of Count Data.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CaoZixia, and SorescuAlina (2013), “Wedded Bliss or Tainted Love? Stock Market Reactions to the Introduction of Cobranded Products,”Marketing Science, 32 (6), 939–59.
9.
CarpenterMason A., and WestphalJames D. (2001), “The Strategic Context of External Network Ties: Examining the Impact of Director Appointments on Board Involvement in Strategic Decision Making,”Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4), 639–60.
10.
ChandyRajesh K., and TellisGerard J. (1998), “Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize,”Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (4), 474–87.
11.
ChandyRajesh K., and TellisGerard J. (2000), “The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation,”Journal of Marketing, 64 (3), 1–17.
12.
ChoTheresa S., and HambrickDonald C. (2006), “Attention as the Mediator Between Top Management Team Characteristics and Strategic Change: The Case of Airline Deregulation,”Organization Science, 17 (4), 453–69.
13.
CohenLauren, FrazziniAndrea, and MalloyChristopher J. (2012), “Hiring Cheerleaders: Board Appointments of ‘Independent’ Directors,”Management Science, 58 (6), 1039–58.
14.
DalzielThomas, GentryRichard J., and BowermanMichael (2011), “An Integrated Agency–Resource Dependence View of the Influence of Directors’ Human and Relational Capital on Firms’ R&D Spending,”Journal of Management Studies, 48 (6), 1217–42.
15.
DavisGerald F. (1991), “Agents Without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill Through the Intercorporate Network,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (4), 583–613.
16.
DayGeorge S. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (4), 37–52.
17.
DayGeorge, and MoormanChristine (2010), Strategy from the Outside In: Profiting from Customer Value.New York: McGraw Hill Professional.
18.
DiMaggioP., and PowellW.W. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Collective Rationality and Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields,”American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–60.
19.
DotzelThomas, ShankarVenkatesh, and BerryLeonard L. (2013), “Service Innovativeness and Firm Value,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (2), 259–76.
20.
EttlieJohn E., BridgesWilliam P., and O'KeefeRobert D. (1984), “Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation,”Management Science, 30 (6), 682–95.
21.
FengHui, MorganNeil A., and RegoLopo L. (2015), “Marketing Department Power and Firm Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 79 (5), 1–20.
22.
FinkelsteinSydney, and HambrickDonald C. (1990), “Top-Management-Team Tenure and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (3), 484–503.
23.
GalassoAlberto, and SimcoeTimothy S. (2011), “CEO Overconfidence and Innovation,”Management Science, 57 (8), 1469–84.
24.
GarciaRosanna, and CalantoneRoger (2002), “A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19 (2), 110–32.
25.
GermannFrank, EbbesPeter, and GrewalRajdeep (2015), “The Chief Marketing Officer Matters!”Journal of Marketing, 79 (3), 1–22.
26.
GielensKatrijn (2012), “New Products: The Antidote to Private Label Growth?”Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (3), 408–23.
27.
GranovetterMark S. (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,”American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), 481–510.
28.
GrewalRajdeep, LilienGary L., and MallapragadaGirish (2006), “Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems,”Management Science, 52 (7), 1043–56.
29.
GroysbergBoris, KellyKevin L., and MacDonaldBryan (2011), “The New Path to the C-Suite,”Harvard Business Review, 89 (3), 60–68.
30.
GulatiRanjay, and GargiuloMartin (1999), “Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?”American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5), 1439–93.
31.
HambrickDonald C. (2007), “Upper Echelons Theory: An Update,”Academy of Management Review, 32 (2), 334–43.
32.
HaunschildPamela R. (1993), “Interorganizational Imitation: The Impact of Interlocks on Corporate Acquisition Activity,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (4), 564–92.
33.
HaunschildPamela R., and BeckmanChristine M. (1998), “When Do Interlocks Matter?: Alternate Sources of Information and Interlock Influence,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (4), 815–44.
34.
HaynesKatalin Takacs, and HillmanAmy (2010), “The Effect of Board Capital and CEO Power on Strategic Change,”Strategic Management Journal, 31 (11), 1145–63.
35.
HendricksKevin B., and SinghalVinod R. (1997), “Delays in New Product Introductions and the Market Value of the Firm: The Consequences of Being Late to the Market,”Management Science, 43 (4), 422–36.
36.
HomburgChristian, WorkmanJohn P.Jr., and KrohmerHarley (1999), “Marketing's Influence Within the Firm,”Journal of Marketing, 63 (2), 1–17.
37.
JanisIrving L. (1972), Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
38.
JensenMichael C., and MecklingWilliam H. (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,”Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305–60.
39.
JindalNiket, and McAlisterLeigh (2015), “The Impacts of Advertising Assets and R&D Assets on Reducing Bankruptcy Risk,”Marketing Science, 34 (4), 555–72.
40.
JirapornPornsit, SinghManohar, and LeeChun I. (2009), “Ineffective Corporate Governance: Director Busyness and Board Committee Memberships,”Journal of Banking & Finance, 33 (5), 819–28.
41.
KashmiriSaim, and MahajanVijay (2010), “What's in a Name? An Analysis of the Strategic Behavior of Family Firms,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (3), 271–80.
KircaAhmet H., JayachandranSatish, and BeardenWilliam O. (2005), “Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Antecedents and Impact on Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (2), 24–41.
44.
KohliAjay K., and JaworskiBernard J. (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 1–18.
45.
KrinskyItzhak, and RobbA. Leslie (1986), “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 68 (4), 715–19.
46.
KumarV., and ShahDenish (2009), “Expanding the Role of Marketing: From Customer Equity to Market Capitalization,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (6), 119–36.
47.
LambNai H., and RoundyPhilip (2016), “The ‘Ties That Bind’ Board Interlocks Research: A Systematic Review,”Management Research Review, 39 (11), 1516–42.
48.
LangJames R., and LockhartDaniel E. (1990), “Increased Environmental Uncertainty and Changes in Board Linkage Patterns,”Academy of Management Journal, 33 (1), 106–28.
49.
LantTheresa K., MillikenFrances J., and BatraBipin (1992), “The Role of Managerial Learning and Interpretation in Strategic Persistence and Reorientation: An Empirical Exploration,”Strategic Management Journal, 13 (8), 585–608.
50.
LewbelArthur (2012), “Using Heteroscedasticity to Identify and Estimate Mismeasured and Endogenous Regressor Models,”Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 30 (1), 67–80.
51.
LorschJay W., and MacIverElizabeth (1989), Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
52.
MariolisPeter, and JonesMaria H. (1982), “Centrality in Corporate Interlock Networks: Reliability and Stability,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 27 (4), 571–85.
53.
McKennyAaron F., AguinisHerman, ShortJeremy C., and AnglinAaron H. (2016), “What Doesn't Get Measured Does Exist: Improving the Accuracy of Computer-Aided Text Analysis,”Journal of Management, (published electronically July 14), DOI: 10.1177/0149206316657594.
54.
MenonTanya, and PfefferJeffrey (2003), “Valuing Internal vs. External Knowledge: Explaining the Preference for Outsiders,”Management Science, 49 (4), 497–513.
55.
MillerDanny (1993), “The Architecture of Simplicity,”Academy of Management Review, 18 (1), 116–38.
56.
MillsWright C. (1956), The Power Elite.New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
MizruchiMark S. (1996), “What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates,”Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–98.
58.
MizruchiMark S., and BuntingDavid (1981), “Influence in Corporate Networks: An Examination of Four Measures,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (3), 475–89.
59.
NguyenBang Dang (2012), “Does the Rolodex Matter? Corporate Elite's Small World and the Effectiveness of Boards of Directors,”Management Science, 58 (2), 236–52.
60.
NooteboomBart (1992), “Towards a Dynamic Theory of Transactions,”Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2 (4), 281–99.
61.
NybergAnthony J., FulmerIngrid Smithey, GerhartBarry, and CarpenterMason A. (2010), “Agency Theory Revisited: CEO Return and Shareholder Interest Alignment,”Academy of Management Journal, 53 (5), 1029–49.
62.
ObstfeldDavid, BorgattiStephen P., and DavisJason (2014), “Brokerage as Process: Decoupling Third Party Action from Social Network Structure,” in Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 40, BrassDaniel J., LabiancaGiuseppe, MehraAjay, HalginDaniel S., and BorgattiStephen P., eds. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
63.
OcasioWilliam (1997), “Towards an Attention-Based View of the Firm,”Strategic Management Journal, 18 (Special Issue), 187–206.
64.
OlsenMitchell C., SlotegraafRebecca J., and ChandukalaSandeep R. (2014), “Green Claims and Message Frames: How Green New Products Change Brand Attitude,”Journal of Marketing, 78 (5), 119–37.
65.
Owen-SmithJason, and PowellWalter W. (2004), “Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community,”Organization Science, 15 (1), 5–21.
66.
PalmerDonald A., JenningsDevereaux P., and ZhouXueguang (1993), “Late Adoption of the Multidivisional Form by Large US Corporations: Institutional, Political, and Economic Accounts,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (1), 100–31.
67.
PaşaMehmet, and ShuganSteven M. (1996), “The Value of Marketing Expertise,”Management Science, 42 (3), 370–88.
68.
PauwelsKoen, Silva-RissoJorge, SrinivasanShuba, and HanssensDominique M. (2004), “New Products, Sales Promotions, and Firm Value: The Case of the Automobile Industry,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 142–56.
69.
PerkinsW. Steven, and RaoRam C. (1990), “The Role of Experience in Information Use and Decision Making by Marketing Managers,”Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (1), 1–10.
70.
PrahaladCoimbatore K., and BettisRichard A. (1986), “The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage Between Diversity and Performance,”Strategic Management Journal, 7 (6), 485–501.
71.
RaoRaghunath Singh, ChandyRajesh K., and PrabhuJaideep C. (2008), “The Fruits of Legitimacy: Why Some New Ventures Gain More from Innovation Than Others,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (4), 58–75.
72.
RindfleischAric, and MoormanChristine (2001), “The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective,”Journal of Marketing, 65 (2), 1–18.
73.
RowleyTim, BehrensDean, and KrackhardtDavid (2000), “Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries,”Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 369–86.
74.
SmithBrian F., and Amoako-AduBen (1999), “Management Succession and Financial Performance of Family Controlled Firms,”Journal of Corporate Finance, 5 (4), 341–68.
75.
SmithMark, and WhiteMichael C. (1987), “Strategy, CEO Specialization, and Succession,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 32 (2), 263–80.
76.
SorescuAlina B., and SpanjolJelena (2008), “Innovation's Effect on Firm Value and Risk: Insights from Consumer Packaged Goods,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (2), 114–32.
77.
SridharShrihari, GermannFrank, KangCharles, and GrewalRajdeep (2016), “Relating Online, Regional, and National Advertising to Firm Value,”Journal of Marketing, 80 (4), 39–55.
78.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., and GielensKatrijn (2003), “Consumer and Market Drivers of the Trial Probability of New Consumer Packaged Goods,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (3), 368–84.
79.
Ter BraakAnne, DekimpeMarnik G., and GeyskensInge (2013), “Retailer Private-Label Margins: The Role of Supplier and Quality-Tier Differentiation,”Journal of Marketing, 77 (4), 86–103.
TuggleChristopher S., SirmonDavid G., ReutzelChristopher R., and BiermanLeonard (2010), “Commanding Board of Director Attention: Investigating How Organizational Performance and CEO Duality Affect Board Members’ Attention to Monitoring,”Strategic Management Journal, 31 (9), 946–68.
82.
UseemMichael (1984), The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity.New York: Oxford University Press.
83.
Van den BulteChristophe, and WuytsStefan (2007), Social Networks and Marketing.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
84.
VerhoefPeter C., and LeeflangPeter S.H. (2009), “Understanding the Marketing Department's Influence Within the Firm,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (2), 14–37.
85.
WangRui, GuptaAditya, and GrewalRajdeep (2017), “Mobility of Top Marketing and Sales Executives in Business-to-Business Markets: A Social Network Perspective,”Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (4), 650–70.
86.
WassermanStanley, and FaustKatherine (1999), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
87.
WestphalJames D., and FredricksonJames W. (2001), “Who Directs Strategic Change? Director Experience, the Election of New CEOs, and Change in Corporate Strategy,”Strategic Management Journal, 22 (12), 1113–37.
88.
WestphalJames D., SeidelMarc-David L., and StewartKatherine J. (2001), “Second-Order Imitation: Uncovering Latent Effects of Board Network Ties,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (4), 717–47.
89.
WiesSimone, and MoormanChristine (2015), “Going Public: How Stock Market Listing Changes Firm Innovation Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (5), 694–709.
90.
YadavManjit S., PrabhuJaideep C., and ChandyRajesh K. (2007), “Managing the Future: CEO Attention and Innovation Outcomes,”Journal of Marketing, 71 (4), 84–101.
91.
ZajacEdward J. (1988), “Interlocking Directorates as an Interorganizational Strategy: A Test of Critical Assumptions,”Academy of Management Journal, 31 (2), 428–38.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
