The authors study specialized personal incentives (SPIs), which are cash rewards granted to salespeople for meeting interim performance goals within the regular sales quota period (monthly, quarterly, etc.). Because firms often institute multiple SPIs, the authors are able to investigate whether different sales achievement trajectories have differential impacts on salespeople's period-end sales performance. The authors find that a steadily growing sales trajectory in a sales period is more strongly associated with period-end success than a sales trajectory that is relatively flat early but has a sharp spike later in the period. Furthermore, although salespeople who had high performance in the prior month (i.e., high-performance state) may be able to draw on superior selling strategies (compared with other salespeople), they too experience a boost in sales performance in the current month by earning SPIs. Notably, the authors also find that although earning SPIs benefits all salespeople, there is a U-shaped relationship between a salesperson's performance state and his or her month-end sales performance. For any specific number of SPIs earned, the probability of meeting and exceeding month-end quotas is boosted more for salespeople with low- and high-performance states than for salespeople with a medium-performance state.
AhearneMichael, LamSon, MathieuJohn, and BolanderWilly (2010), “Why Are Some Salespeople Better at Adapting to Organizational Change,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (3), 65–79.
2.
AartsHenk, and DijksterhuisAp (2000), “Habits as Knowledge Structures: Automaticity in Goal-Directed Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (1), 53–63.
AustinJames, and VancouverJeffrey (1996), “Goal Constructs in Psychology: Structure, Process, and Content,”Psychological Bulletin, 120 (3), 338–75.
5.
BanduraAlbert, and CervoneDaniel (1983), “Self-Evaluative and Self-Efficacy Mechanisms Governing the Motivational Effects of Goal Systems,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (5), 1017–28.
6.
BaumeisterRoy E., and TiceDianne M. (1985), “Self-Esteem and Responses to Success and Failure: Subsequent Performance and Intrinsic Motivation,”Journal of Personality, 53 (3), 450–67.
7.
BentlerPeter M., and SpeckartGeorge (1979), “Models of Attitude-Behavior Relations,”Psychological Review, 85 (6), 452–64.
8.
BonezziAndrea, BrendlMiguel, and De AngelisMatteo (2011), “Stuck in the Middle: The Psychophysics of Goal Pursuit,”Psychological Science, 22 (5), 607–12.
9.
CamererColin, BabcockLinda, LoewensteinGeorge, and ThalerRichard (1997), “Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (2), 407–41.
10.
ChungDoug, SteenburghThomas, and SudhirK. (2014), “Do Bonuses Enhance Productivity? A Dynamic Structural Analysis of Bonus-Based Compensation Plans,”Marketing Science, 33 (2), 165–87.
11.
CrooksTerence (1988), “The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students,”Review of Educational Research, 58 (4), 438–81.
12.
DempsterFrank (1987), “Time and Production of Classroom Learning: Discerning Implications from Basic Research,”Educational Psychologist, 22 (1), 1–21.
13.
DempsterFrank (1988), “The Spacing Effect: A Case Study in the Failure to Apply the Results of Psychological Research,”American Psychologist, 43 (8), 627–33.
14.
DevezerBerna, SprottDavid, SpangenbergEric, and CzellarSandor (2014), “Consumer Well-Being: Effects of Subgoal Failures and Goal Importance,”Journal of Marketing, 78 (2), 118–34.
15.
FishbachAyelet, and DharRavi (2005), “Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 370–77.
16.
FishbachAyelet, and RaviDhar (2008), “Dynamics of Goal-Based Choice: Toward an Understanding of How Goals Commit Versus Liberate Choice,”Handbook of Consumer PsychologyHaugtvedtCurtis P., HerrPaul M., and KardesFrank R., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 611–38.
17.
FishbachAyelet, ShahJames Y., and KruglanskiArie W. (2004), “Emotional Transfer in Goal Systems,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (6), 723–38.
18.
FishbachAyelet, ZhangYing, and DharRavi (2006), “Subgoals as Substitutes or Complements: The Role of Goal Accessibility,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (2), 232–42.
GolderPeter N., and TellisGerrard J. (1993), “Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend?”Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (2), 158–70.
21.
GollwitzerPeter M., and BrandstaetterVeronica (1997), “Implementation Intentions and Effective Goal Pursuit,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186–99.
22.
GreenBrett S., and ZwiebelJeffrey (2013), “The Hot Hand Fallacy: Cognitive Mistakes or Equilibrium Adjustments?”Working Paper No. 3101, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
23.
HeathChip, LarrickRichard, and WuGeorge (1999), “Goals as Reference Points,”Cognitive Psychology, 38 (1), 79–109.
24.
HeathertonTodd F., and PolivyJanet (1991), “Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring State Self-Esteem,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (6), 895–910
JaniszewskiChris, NoelHayden, and SawyerAlan G. (2003), “A Meta-Analysis of the Spacing Effect in Verbal Learning: Implications for Research on Advertising Repetition and Consumer Memory,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (1), 138–49.
27.
KornellNate (2009), “Optimizing Learning Using Flashcards: Spacing Is More Effective Than Cramming,”Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23 (9), 1297–317.
28.
LalRajiv, and SrinivasanV.S. (1993), “Compensation Plans for Single and Multi-Product Salesforces: An Application of the Holmstrom-Milgrom Model,”Management Science, 39 (7), 777–93.
29.
LockeEdwin A., and LathamGary P. (1990a), A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
LockeEdwin A., and LathamGary P. (1990b), “Work Motivation and Satisfaction: Light at the End of the Tunnel,”Psychological Science, 1 (4), 240–46.
31.
MalhotraNaresh (1983), “On Individual Differences in Search Behavior for a Nondurable,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (1), 125–31.
32.
MillerJoshua B., and SanjurjoAdam (2015), “Surprised by the Gamblers and Hot Hand Fallacies? A Truth in the Law of Small Numbers,”IGIER Working Paper #552, Bocconi University.
33.
OhlySandra, SonnentagSabine, and PlunkteFranziska (2006), “Routinization, Work Characteristics and Their Relationships with Creative and Proactive Behaviors,”Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (3), 257–79.
34.
OliverRichard L. (1974), “Expectancy Theory Predictions of Salesmen's Performance,”Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (3), 243–53.
35.
SchmidtRobert (1983), “Who Maximizes What? A Study in Student Time Allocation,”American Economic Review, 73 (2), 23–28.
36.
SchunkDale H. (1983), “Reward Contingencies and the Development of Children's Skills and Self-Efficacy,”Journal of Educational Psychology, 75 (4), 511–18.
37.
SchunkDale H. (1984), “Enhancing Self-Efficacy and Achievement Through Rewards and Goals: Motivational and Informational Effects,”Journal of Educational Research, 78 (1), 29–34.
38.
SchunkDale H. (1991), Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective.New York: Macmillan.
39.
SilvermanIrwin (1964), “Self-Esteem and Differential Responsiveness to Success and Failure,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69 (1), 115–19.
40.
SteenburghThomas (2008), “Effort or Timing: The Effect of Lump-Sum Bonuses,”Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 6 (3), 235–56.
41.
SujanHarish, WeitzBarton, and KumarNirmalya (1994), “Learning Orientation, Working Smart, and Effective Selling,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 39–52.
42.
VancouverJeffrey, ThompsonCharles, and WilliamsAmy (2001), “The Changing Signs in the Relationships Among Self-Efficacy, Personal Goals, and Performance,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (4), 605–20.
43.
VroomVictor H. (1964), Work and Motivation.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
44.
WyerRobert S., and SrullThomas K. (1989), Memory and Cognition in Social Content.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45.
ZoltnersAndris A., PrabhakantSinha, and LorimerSally E. (2006), The Complete Guide to Sales Force Incentive Compensation.New York: American Management Association.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
