Market orientation (MO) and marketing performance measurement (MPM) are two of the most widespread strategic marketing concepts among practitioners. However, some have questioned the benefits of extensive investments in MO and MPM. More importantly, little is known about which combinations of MO and MPM are optimal in ensuring high business performance. To address this research gap, the authors analyze a unique data set of 628 firms with a novel method of configurational analysis: fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. In line with prior research, the authors find that MO is an important determinant of business performance. However, to reap its benefits, managers need to complement it with appropriate MPM, the level and focus of which vary across firms. For example, whereas large firms and market leaders generally benefit from comprehensive MPM, small firms may benefit from measuring marketing performance only selectively or by focusing on particular dimensions of marketing performance. The study also finds that many of the highest-performing firms do not follow any of the particular best practices identified.
DayGeorge S. and NedungadiPrakash (1994), “Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (April), 31–44.
7.
DeshpandéRohit, FarleyJohn U., and WebsterFrederick E.Jr. (1993), “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovation in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis,”Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 23–37.
8.
DotyD. Harold, GlickWilliam H., and HuberGeorge P. (1993), “Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories,”Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6), 1196–250.
9.
EisenhardtKathleen M. (1985), “Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches,”Management Science, 31 (2), 134–49.
10.
FarrisPaul W., BendleNeil T., PfeiferPhillip E., and ReibsteinDavid J. (2006), Marketing Metrics: 50+ Metrics Every Executive Should Master, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
11.
FissPeer C. (2007), “A Set-Theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations,”Academy of Management Review, 32 (4), 1180–98.
12.
FissPeer C. (2011), “Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research,”Academy of Management Journal, 54 (2), 393–420.
13.
FissPeer C., SharapovDmitry, and CronqvistLasse (2013), “Opposites Attract? Opportunities and Challenges for Integrating Large-N QCA and Econometric Analysis,”Political Research Quarterly, 66 (1), 191–98.
14.
ForlaniDavid, ParthasarathyMadhavan, and KeaveneySusan M. (2008), “Managerial Risk Perceptions of International Entry-Mode Strategies: The Interaction Effect of Control and Capability,”International Marketing Review, 25 (3), 292–311.
15.
FrambachRuud T., FissPeer C., and IngenbleekPaul T.M. (2016), “How Important is Customer Orientation for Firm Performance? A Fuzzy Set Analysis of Orientations, Strategies, and Environments,”Journal of Business Research, 69 (4), 1428–36.
16.
Garcia-CastroRoberto and FrancoeurClaude (2014), “When More Is Not Better: Complementarities, Costs and Contingencies in Stakeholder Management,”Strategic Management Journal, 37 (2), 406–24.
17.
GebhardtGary F., CarpenterGregory S., and SherryJohn F.Jr. (2006), “Creating a Market Orientation: A Longitudinal, Multifirm, Grounded Analysis of Cultural Transformation,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (October), 37–55.
18.
GrandoriAnna and FurnariSanti (2008), “A Chemistry of Organization: Combinatory Analysis and Design,”Organization Studies, 29 (3), 459–85.
19.
GreveHenrich R. (1998), “Managerial Cognition and the Mimetic Adoption of Market Positions: What You See Is What You Do,”Strategic Management Journal, 19 (10), 967–88.
20.
GrinsteinAmir (2008), “The Effect of Market Orientation and Its Components on Innovation Consequences: A Meta-Analysis,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (2), 166–73.
HomburgChristian, ArtzMartin, and WiesekeJan (2012), “Marketing Performance Measurement Systems: Does Comprehensiveness Really Improve Performance?”Journal of Marketing, 76 (May), 56–77.
24.
HultG. Tomas M., KetchenDavid J., and SlaterStanley F. (2005), “Market Orientation and Performance: An Integration of Disparate Approaches,”Strategic Management Journal, 26 (12), 1173–81.
25.
JaworskiBernard J. (1988), “Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences,”Journal of Marketing, 52 (July), 23–39.
26.
JaworskiBernard J., KohliAjay K., and SahayArvind (2000), “Market-Driven Versus Driving Markets,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (1), 45–54.
27.
JaworskiBernard J., StathakopoulosVlasis, and Shanker KrishnanH. (1993), “Control Combinations in Marketing: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence,”Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 57–69.
28.
KetchenDavid J.Jr., ThomasJames B., and SnowCharles C. (1993), “Organizational Configurations and Performance: A Comparison of Theoretical Approaches,”Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6), 1278–313.
29.
KircaAhmet H., JayachandranSatish, and BeardenWilliam O. (2005), “Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Impact on Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 69 (April), 24–41.
30.
KumarV. (2015), “Evolution of Marketing as a Discipline: What Has Happened and What to Look Out For,”Journal of Marketing, 79 (January), 1–9.
31.
KumarV., JonesEli, VenkatesanRajkumar, and LeoneRobert P. (2011), “Is Market Orientation a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage or Simply the Cost of Competing?”Journal of Marketing, 75 (January), 16–30.
32.
MahoneyJames, KimballErin, and KoivuKendra L. (2009), “The Logic of Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences,”Comparative Political Studies, 42 (1), 114–46.
MeyerAlan D., TsuiAnne S., and HiningsC.R. (1993), “Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis,”Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6), 1175–95.
35.
MintzOfer and CurrimImran S. (2013), “What Drives Managerial Use of Marketing and Financial Metrics and Does Metric Use Affect Performance of Marketing-Mix Activities?”Journal of Marketing, 77 (March), 17–40.
36.
MintzOfer and CurrimImran S. (2015), “When Does Metric Use Matter Less? How Firm and Managerial Characteristics Moderate the Relationship Between Metric Use and Marketing Mix Performance,”European Journal of Marketing, 49 (11/12), 1809–56.
37.
MorganNeil A., ClarkBruce H., and GoonerRich (2002), “Marketing Productivity, Marketing Audits, and Systems for Marketing Performance Assessment: Integrating Multiple Perspectives,”Journal of Business Research, 55 (5), 363–75.
38.
NarverJohn C. and SlaterStanley F. (1990), “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (October), 20–35.
39.
NobleCharles H., SinhaRajiv K., and KumarAjith (2002), “Market Orientation and Alternative Strategic Orientations: A Longitudinal Assessment of Performance Implications,”Journal of Marketing, 66 (October), 25–39.
OrdaniniAndrea, ParasuramanA., and RuberaGaia (2014), “When the Recipe is More Important Than the Ingredients: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) of Service Innovation Configurations,”Journal of Service Research, 17 (2), 134–49.
42.
O'sullivan, Don and Andrew V. Abela (2007), “Marketing Performance Measurement Ability and Business Performance,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (April), 79–93.
OuchiWilliam G. (1979), “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms,”Management Science, 25 (9), 833–48.
45.
PetersenAndrew J., McAlisterLeigh, ReibsteinDavid J., WinerRussell S., KumarV., and AtkinsonGeoff (2009), “Choosing the Right Metrics to Maximize Profitability and Shareholder Value,”Journal of Retailing, 85 (1), 95–111.
46.
PorterMichael E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.
47.
RaginCharles C. (2000), Fuzzy Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
RaginCharles C. (2008), Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
RustRoland T., AmblerTim, CarpenterGregory S., KumarV., and SrivastavaRajendra K. (2004), “Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (October), 76–89.
50.
RustRoland T., LemonKatherine N., and ZeithamlValarie A. (2004), “Return on Marketing: Using Customer Equity to Focus Marketing Strategy,”Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 109–27.
51.
SchepersJeroen, FalkTomas, de RuyterKo, de JongAd, and HammerschmidtMaik (2012), “Principles and Principals: Do Customer Stewardship and Agency Control Compete or Complement When Shaping Frontline Employee Behavior?”Journal of Marketing, 76 (November), 1–20.
ShethJagdish N. (2011), “Impact of Emerging Markets on Marketing: Rethinking Existing Perspectives and Practices,”Journal of Marketing, 75 (July), 166–82.
54.
ShortJeremy C., PayneG. Tyge, and KetchenDavid J. (2008), “Research on Organizational Configurations: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges,”Journal of Management, 34 (6), 1053–79.
55.
SrinivasanShuba, VanhueleMarc, and PauwelsKoen (2010), “Mind-Set Metrics in Market Response Models: An Integrative Approach,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (August), 672–84.
TolstoyLeo (1877), Anna Karenina. Moscow: The Russian Messenger.
60.
TreacyMichael and WiersemaFred (1997), The Discipline of Market Leaders: Choose Your Customers, Narrow Your Focus, Dominate Your Market. New York: Perseus Publishing.
61.
VerhoefPeter C. and LeeflangPeter S. H. (2009), “Understanding the Marketing Department's Influence Within the Firm,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (March), 14–37.
62.
VorhiesDouglas W. and MorganNeil A. (2003), “A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit with Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 67 (January), 100–15.
63.
WieselThorsten, SkieraBernd, and VillanuevaJulián (2008), “Customer Equity: An Integral Part of Financial Reporting,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (March), 1–14.
64.
WoodsideArch G. (2010), “Bridging the Chasm Between Survey and Case Study Research: Research Methods for Achieving Generalization, Accuracy, and Complexity,”Industrial Marketing Management, 39 (1), 64–75.
65.
WoodsideArch G. (2013), “Moving Beyond Multiple Regression Analysis to Algorithms: Calling for Adoption of a Paradigm Shift from Symmetric to Asymmetric Thinking in Data Analysis and Crafting Theory,”Journal of Business Research, 66 (4), 463–72.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
