Previous research has typically treated collection as a top-down process and focused on its later stages. However, collections may start by accident and are often triggered by incidental, bottom-up factors. The authors propose that a small number of possessions (i.e., a few more than one) represent an unjustified and, thus, unstable possession level that prompts a status change. They examine the collection tipping point at which obtaining items belonging to a series (e.g., a couple of collectible Coke cans) often gives rise to a decision to start a collection. Consumers then seek additional items to fulfill their emerging goal. In six lab studies and one field study, the authors investigate the tipping point at which a collection “project” begins and explore the psychological processes underlying that tipping point. In addition, they discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of this research.
ArkesHal R. and BlumerCatherine(1985), “The Psychology of Sunk Cost,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes35(February), 124–40.
2.
BagozziRichard P. and DholakiaUtpal(1999), “Goal Setting and Goal Striving in Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Marketing63 (Special Issue), 19–32.
3.
BelkRussell W.(1995), Collecting in a Consumer Society. New York: Routledge.
4.
BelkRussell W., WallendorfMelanie, SherryJohn, HolbrookMorris, and RobertsScott(1988), “Collectors and Collecting,”inAdvances in Consumer ResearchVol. 15HoustonMichael J.ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research548–53.
5.
BettmanJames R., LuceMary Frances, and PayneJohn W.(1998), “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes,”Journal of Consumer Research25(3), 187–217.
6.
BreckenridgeCarol(1989), “The Aesthetics and Politics of Colonial Collecting: India at World Fairs,”Comparative Studies in Society and History31(2), 195–216.
7.
BrehmJack W.(1972), Responses to the Loss of Freedom: A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
8.
CareyCatherine(2008), “Modeling Collecting Behavior: The Role of Set Completion,”Journal of Economic Psychology29(3), 336–47.
9.
CarlsonKurt A. and ShuSuzanne B.(2007), “The Rule of Three: How the Third Event Signals the Emergence of a Streak,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes104(1), 113–21.
10.
CliffordJames(1985), “Objects and Selves: An Afterword,”inObjects and Others: Essays on Museums and Material CultureStockingGeorge W.Jr.ed. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press236–46.
11.
DharRavi(1996), “The Effect of Decision Strategy on the Decision to Defer Choice,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making9(December), 265–81.
12.
DharRavi(1997), “Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option,”Journal of Consumer Research24(2), 215–31.
13.
DharRavi and SimonsonItamar(2003), “The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research40(May), 146–60.
14.
FormanekRuth(1991), “Why They Collect: Collectors Reveal Their Motivations,”Journal of Social Behavior and Personality6(6), 275–86.
15.
GentnerDedre and MarkmanArthur B.(1997), “Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity,”American Psychologist52(1), 45–56.
16.
HuffmanCynthia, RatneshwarS., and MickDavid Glen(2000), “Consumer Goal Structures and Goal Determination Processes: An Integrative Framework,”inThe Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumer Motives, Goals, and DesiresRatneshwarS., MickDavid Glen, and HuffmanCynthia eds. London: Routledge9–35.
17.
HullClark L.(1932), “The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis and Maze Learning,”Psychological Review39(1), 25–43.
18.
HullClark L.(1934), “The Rats‘ Speed of Locomotion Gradient in the Approach to Food,”Journal of Comparative Psychology17(3), 393–422.
KivetzRan, UrminskyOleg, and ZhengYuhuang(2006), “The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer Retention,”Journal of Marketing Research43(February), 39–58.
21.
MarquisAlice G.(1991), The Art Biz: The Covert World of Collectors, Dealers, Auction Houses, Museums, and Critics. Chicago: Contemporary Books.
22.
McAlisterAnna R., CornwellT. Bettina, and CornainEmilita Krisanti(2011), “Collectible Toys and Decisions to Share: I Will Gift You One to Expand My Set,”British Journal of Developmental Psychology29(1), 1–17.
23.
McIntoshWilliams D. and SchmeichelBrandon(2004), “Collectors and Collecting: A Social Psychological Perspective,”Leisure Sciences26(1), 85–91.
24.
MickDavid Glen and DeMossMichelle(1990), “Self-Gifts: Phenomenological Insights from Four Contexts,”Journal of Consumer Research17(3), 322–32.
25.
O'BrienG.(1981), “Living with Collections,”New York Times Magazine, (April 26), 25–42.
26.
PearceSusan M.(1992), Museums, Objects, and Collections: A Cultural Study. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.
27.
PearceSusan M.(1994), Interpreting Objects and Collections (Leicester Readers in Museum Studies). London: Routledge.
28.
PearceSusan M.(1998), Collecting in Contemporary Practice. London: Sage Publications.
29.
PreacherKristopher J., RuckerDerek D., and HayesAndrew F.(2007), “Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions,”Multivariate Behavioral Research42(1), 185–227.
30.
RichinsMarsha L. and RudminFloyd W.(1994), “Materialism and Economic Psychology,”Journal of Economic Psychology15(2), 217–31.
31.
RobertsMichele and PettigrewSimone(2007), “A Thematic Content Analysis of Children's Food Advertising,”International Journal of Advertising26(3), 357–67.
32.
ShafirEldar, SimonsonItamar, and TverskyAmos(1993), “Reason-Based Choice,”Cognition49(1), 11–36.
33.
SimonsonItamar(1989), “Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects,”Journal of Consumer Research16(2), 158–74.
34.
TverskyAmos and ShafirEldar(1992), “Choice Under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision,”Psychological Science3(6), 358–61.
35.
WanEcho Wen and RuckerDerek D.(2013), “Confidence and Construal Framing: When Confidence Increases Versus Decreases Information Processing,”Journal of Consumer Research39(5), 977–92.
36.
WrightPeter(1974), “On the Direct Monitoring of Cognitive Responses to Advertising,”inBuyer/Consumer Information ProcessingHughesDavid G. and RayMichael L. eds. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press220–48.
