Marketers often offer consumers the option to “supersize” a food purchase intended for immediate consumption. Supersized products may be attractive to consumers from the standpoint of the unit pricing because ordering a larger size of the same product results in a per-unit savings and offers consumers the opportunity to meet their value-based financial goals. In this article, the authors show that such pricing strategies not only lead to greater purchase and consumption but do so by affecting important consumer goals in unrelated domains—namely, by decreasing the importance placed on health goals. Although supersized pricing can have a powerful effect on purchase behavior, providing health cues can prevent the decreased focus on health. In addition, supersized pricing can be used to increase size choice of healthy foods. The authors discuss the study's contributions to theory, particularly for understanding decisions regarding the pursuit of multiple goals and, more specifically, those that lie at the intersection of health and finance. In addition, the results suggest both marketing and public policy implications, including those for the obesity epidemic and frequent use of supersized pricing strategies for unhealthy foods.
AllenbyGreg M., ShivelyThomas S., YangSha, and GarrattMark J. (2004), “A Choice Model for Packaged Goods: Dealing with Discrete Quantities and Quantity Discounts,”Marketing Science, 23(1), 95–108.
2.
ArielyDan, and LevavJonathan (2000), “Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 279–90.
3.
AydinogluNilufer Z., and KrishnaAradhna (2011), “Guiltless Gluttony: The Asymmetric Effect of Size Labels on Size Perceptions and Consumption,”Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 1095–1112.
4.
BaumeisterRoy F., HeathertonTodd F., and TiceDianne M. (1994), Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-Regulation.San Diego: Academic Press.
5.
CarlsonKurt A., MeloyMargaret G., and MillerElizabeth G. (2013), “Goal Reversion in Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 918–30.
6.
ChandonPierre, and WansinkBrian (2007), “The Biasing Health Halos of Fast Food Restaurant Health Claims: Lower Calorie Estimates and Higher Side-Dish Consumption Intentions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 301–314.
7.
ChartrandTanya L., HuberJoel, ShivBaba, and TannerRobin J (2008), “Nonconscious Goals and Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 189–201.
8.
CloseRachel N., and SchoellerDale A. (2006), “The Financial Reality of Overeating,”Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 25(3), 203–209.
9.
DharRavi, and SimonsonItamar (1999), “Making Complementary Choices in Consumption Episodes: Highlighting Versus Balancing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(February), 29–44.
10.
DobsonPaul W., and GerstnerEitan (2010), “For a Few Cents More: Why Supersize Unhealthy Food?”Marketing Science, 29(4), 770–78.
11.
DolanRobert, J. (1987), “Quantity Discounts: Managerial Issues and Research Opportunities,”Marketing Science, 6(1), 1–22.
12.
DrewnowskiAdam (2010), “The Cost of U.S. Foods as Related to Their Nutritive Value,”American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 92(5), 1181–88.
13.
FishbachAyelet, and DharRavi (2005), “Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 370–77.
14.
FishbachAyelet, FriedmanRonald S., and KruglanskiArie W. (2003), “Leading Us Not into Temptation: Momentary Allurements Elicit Overriding Goal Activation,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 296–309.
15.
FlegalKatherine M., CarrollMargaret D., OgdenCynthia L., and CurtinLester R. (2010), “Prevalence and Trends in Obesity Among U.S. Adults, 1999–2008,”Journal of the American Medical Association, 303(3), 235–41.
16.
FrenchSimone, A. (2003), “Pricing Effects on Food Choices,”Journal of Nutrition, 133(3), 841S–43.
17.
GaluskaDeborah A., WillJulie C., SerdulaMary K., and FordEarl S. (1999), “Are Health Care Professionals Advising Obese Patients to Lose Weight?”Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(16), 1576–78.
18.
GouldStephen, J. (1990), “Health Consciousness and Health Behavior: The Application of a New Health Consciousness Scale,”American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 6(4), 228–37.
19.
GrewalDhruv, MonroeKent B., and KrishnanR. (1998), “The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions,”Journal of Marketing, 62(April), 46–59.
GuZheyin, and YangSha (2010), “Quantity-Discount-Dependent Consumer Preferences and Competitive Nonlinear Pricing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(December), 1100–13.
22.
HauserJ.R., and UrbanGlen (1986), “The Value Priority Hypotheses for Consumer Budget Plans,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12(4), 446–62.
23.
HochStephen J., and LoewensteinGeorge F. (1991), “Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Consumer Self-Control,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 492–506.
24.
JainSanjay (2012), “Marketing of Vice Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Package Size Decision,”Marketing Science, 31(1), 36–51.
25.
JetterKaren M., and CassadyDiana L. (2006), “The Availability and Cost of Healthier Food Alternatives,”American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(1), 38–44.
26.
KhanRomana J., and JainDipak C. (2005), “An Empirical Analysis of Price Discrimination Mechanisms and Retailer Profitability,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42(November), 516–24.
27.
KhanUzma, and DharRavi (2010), “Price-Framing Effects on the Purchase of Hedonic and Utilitarian Bundles,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(December), 1090–99.
28.
LangleyRussell (1970), Practical Statistics for Non-Mathematical People.London: Pan Books.
29.
LaranJuliano, and JaniszewskiChris (2009), “Behavioral Consistency and Inconsistency in the Resolution of Goal Conflict,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 967–84.
30.
MaYu, AilawadiKusum L., GauriDinesh K., and GrewalDhruv (2011), “An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Gasoline Prices on Grocery Shopping Behavior,”Journal of Marketing, 75(March), 18–35.
31.
MandelNaomi, and JohnsonEric J. (2002), “When Web Pages Influence Choice: Effects of Visual Primes on Experts and Novices,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 235–45.
32.
MukhopadhyayAnirban, SenguptaJaideep, and RamanathanSuresh (2008), “Recalling Past Temptations: An Information-Processing Perspective on the Dynamics of Self-Control,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 586–99.
33.
National Alliance for Nutrition and Activity (2002), “From Wallet to Waistline: The Hidden Costs of Super Sizing,” research report, (June), (accessed January 24, 2013), [available at http://www.cspinet.org/w2w.pdf].
34.
NaylorRebecca Walker, RaghunathanRajagopal, and RamanathanSuresh (2006), “Promotions Spontaneously Induce a Positive Evaluative Response,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(3), 295–305.
35.
OkadaErica Mina (2005), “Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42(February), 43–53.
36.
PoynorCait, and HawsKelly L. (2009), “Lines in the Sand: Using Category Widths to Define and Pursue Self-Control Goals,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 772–87.
37.
PreacherKristopher J., and HayesAndrew F. (2004), “SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models,”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(4), 717–31.
38.
PreacherKristopher J., RuckerDerek D., and HayesAndrew F. (2007), “Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions,”Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
39.
RaghunathanRajagopal, NaylorRebecca Walker, and HoyerWayne D. (2006), “The Unhealthy = Tasty Intuition and Its Effects on Taste Inferences, Enjoyment, and Choice of Food Products,”Journal of Marketing, 70(October), 170–84.
40.
ReddenJoseph P., and HawsKelly L. (2013), “Healthy Satiation: The Role of Decreasing Desire in Effective Self-Control,”Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1100–14.
41.
SchindlerRobert, M. (1998), “Consequences of Perceiving Oneself as Responsible for Obtaining a Discount: Evidence for Smart-Shopper Feelings,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(4), 371–92.
42.
SelaAner, BergerJonah, and LiuWendy (2009), “Variety, Vice, and Virtue: How Assortment Size Influences Option Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 941–51.
43.
ShahJames Y, FriedmanRonald S., and KruglanskiArie W. (2002), “Forgetting All Else: On the Antecedents and Consequences of Goal Shielding,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1261–80.
44.
ShahJames Y, and KruglanskiArie W. (2003), “When Opportunity Knocks: Bottom-up Priming of Goals by Means and Its Effects on Self-Regulation,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1109–1122.
45.
SharpeKathryn M., StaelinRichard, and HuberJoel (2008), “Using Extremeness Aversion to Fight Obesity: Policy Implications of Context Dependent Demand,”Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 406–421.
46.
ShivBaba, and FedorikhinAlexander (1999), “Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278–92.
47.
SpencerSteven J., ZannaMark P., and FongGeoffrey T. (2005), “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–51.
48.
SprottDavid E., ManningKenneth C., and MiyazakiAnthony D. (2003), “Grocery Price Setting and Quantity Surcharges,”Journal of Marketing, 67(July), 34–46.
49.
StroebeWolfgang (2008), “Restrained Eating and the Breakdown,” in Dieting, Overweight, and Obesity: Self-Regulation in a Food-Rich Environment, Chap. 6. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 115–39.
50.
SubramaniamRamanathan, and Gal-OrEsther (2009), “Quantity Discounts in Differentiated Consumer Product Markets,”Marketing Science, 28(1), 180–92.
51.
VancouverJeffrey B., WeinhardtJustin M., and SchmidtAaron (2010), “A Formal, Computational Theory of Multiple-Goal Pursuit: Integrating Goal-Choice and Goal-Striving Processes, Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 985–1008.
WangJing, NovemskyNathan, DharRavi, and BaumeisterRoy F. (2010), “Trade-Offs and Depletion in Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(October), 910–19.
54.
WansinkBrian, C. (1996), “Can Package Size Accelerate Usage Volume?”Journal of Marketing, 60(July), 1–14.
55.
WansinkBrian C., KentRobert J., and HochStephen J. (1998), “An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Purchase Quantity Decisions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 35(February), 71–81.
56.
WansinkBrian C., PayneCollin R., and ChandonPierre (2007), “Internal and External Cues of Meal Cessation: The French Paradox Redux?”Obesity, 15(12), 2920–24.
57.
WilcoxKeith, VallenBeth, BlockLauren, and FitzsimonsGavan (2009), “Vicarious Goal Fulfillment: When the Mere Presence of a Healthy Option Leads to an Ironically Indulgent Decision,”Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 380–93.
58.
WinterichKaren Page, and BaroneMichael J. (2011), “Warm Glow or Cold, Hard Cash? Social Identify Effects on Consumer Choice for Donation Versus Discount Promotions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 48(October), 855–68.
59.
WinterichKaren Page, and HawsKelly L. (2011), “Helpful Hopefulness: The Effect of Future Positive Emotions on Consumption,”Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 505–524.
60.
ZhangYing, HuangSzu-Chi, and BroniarczykSusan M. (2010), “Counteractive Construal in Consumer Goal Pursuit,”Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 129–42.
61.
ZhangYinlong, WinterichKaren Page, and MittalVikas (2010), “Power Distance Belief and Impulsive Buying,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(October), 945–54.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
