Success of many products depends on how consumers learn to use them. This research suggests that initial product trial may lead to jumps in consumer learning. Such discontinuities in learning co-occur with the experience of insight—namely, a better conceptual understanding of how to use the product. Notably, such learning also positively affects downstream outcomes such as affect and usage intentions. Whereas exploration during initial trial facilitates insight-based learning, usage instructions seem to limit this type of learning. The implication for marketing managers is to structure initial trials in a manner conducive to exploration, thus leading to insight-driven learning and the associated positive outcomes.
AllwoodCarl M. (1990), “Computer Usage by Novices,” in Encyclopedia of Micro-Computers, KentA., and WilliamsJ.G., eds. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 37–56.
2.
AndersonJohn R. (1999), “Skill Acquisition,” in Learning and Memory, AndersonJohn R., ed. New York: John Miller, 304–337.
3.
BeihalGabriel, and ChakravartiDipankar (1982), “Information-Presentation Format and Learning Goals as Determinants of Consumers’ Memory Retrieval and Choice Processes,”Journal of Consumer Research, 8(4), 431–41.
4.
Besterfield-SacreMary, GerchakJessica, LyonsMaryRose, ShumanLarry J., and WolfeHarvey (2004), “Scoring Concept Maps: Development of an Integrated Rubric for Assessing Engineering Education,”Journal of Engineering Education, 93(2), 105–116.
5.
BødkerSusanne (1989), “A Human Activity Approach to User Interfaces,”Human-Computer Interaction, 4(3), 171–95.
6.
BursonKatherine A. (2007), “Consumer–Product Skill Matching: The Effects of Difficulty on Relative Self-Assessment and Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 104–110.
7.
ChandyRajesh K., and TellisGerard J. (2000), “The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation,”Journal of Marketing, 64(July), 1–17.
8.
CohenNeal J., and SquireLarry R. (1980), “Preserved Learning and Retention of Pattern-Analyzing Skill in Amnesia: Dissociation of Knowing How and Knowing That,”Science, 210(4466), 207–210.
9.
CrutcherRobert J. (1994), “Telling What We Know: The Use of Verbal Report Methodologies in Psychological Research,”Psychological Science, 5(5), 241–44.
10.
DabholkarPratibha A., and BagozziRichard P. (2002), “An Attitudinal Model of Technology-Based Self-Service: Moderating Effects of Consumer Traits and Situational Factors,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 184–201.
11.
DahlDarren W., and Page MoreauC. (2007), “Thinking Inside the Box: Why Consumers Enjoy Constrained Creative Experiences,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44(August), 357–69.
12.
DavisFred D. (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,”MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–40.
13.
EricssonK. Anders (2006), “Protocol Analysis and Expert Thought: Concurrent Verbalizations of Thinking During Experts’ Performance on Representative Task,” in Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, EricssonK.A., CharnessN., FeltovichP., and HoffmanR.R., eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 223–42.
14.
EricssonK. Anders, and SimonHerbert A. (1993), Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
EstesWilliam K. (1956), “The Problem of Inference from Curves Based on Group Data,”Psychological Bulletin, 53(2), 134–40.
GouldStephen J., and EldredgeNiles (1977), “Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered,”Paleobiology, 3(2), 115–51.
18.
Gregan-PaxtonJennifer (2001), “The Role of Abstract and Specific Knowledge in the Formation of Product Judgments: An Analogical Learning Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(3), 141–58.
19.
GretherWalter F., and MaslowAbraham H. (1937), “An Experimental Study of Insight in Monkeys,”Journal of Comparative Psychology, 24(1), 127–34.
HochStephen J., and HaYoung-Won (1986), “Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 221–33.
23.
HornbækKasper (2006), “Current Practice in Measuring Usability: Challenges to Usability Studies and Research,”International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 79–102.
24.
HuangPeng, LurieNicholas H., and MitraSabyasachi (2009), “Searching for Experience on the Web: An Empirical Examination of Consumer Behavior for Search and Experience Goods,”Journal of Marketing, 73(March), 55–69.
25.
HutchinsonJoseph W., and AlbaJoseph W. (1997), “Heuristics and Biases in the ‘Eyeballing’ of Data: The Effects of Context on Intuitive Correlation Assessment,”Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 23(3), 591–621.
26.
IsenAlice M. (2001), “An Influence of Positive Affect on Decision Making in Complex Situations: Theoretical Issues with Practical Implications,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(2), 75–85.
27.
JohnsonEric J., BellmanSteven, and LohseGerald L. (2003), “Cognitive Lock-In and the Power Law of Practice,”Journal of Marketing, 67(April), 62–75.
28.
Leont'evAleksei N. (1974), “The Problem of Activity in Psychology,”Soviet Psychology, 13(2), 4–33.
29.
MatthewCynthia T., and SternbergRobert J. (2009), “Developing Experience-Based (Tacit) Knowledge Through Reflection,”Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 530–40.
30.
MayerRichard E. (1995), “The Search for Insight: Grappling with Gestalt Psychology's Unanswered Questions,” in The Nature of Insight, SternbergR.J., and DavidsonJ.E., eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–32.
31.
MeuterMatthew L., BitnerMary Jo, OstromAmy L., and BrownStephen W. (2005), “Choosing Among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies,”Journal of Marketing, 69(April), 61–83.
32.
MoeWendy W., and YangSha (2009), “The Impact of a New Competitive Entry on an Incumbent's Customer Base,”Journal of Marketing, 73(January), 109–121.
33.
MoreauC. Page, and DahlDarren W. (2005), “Designing the Solution: The Influence of Constraints on Consumer Creativity,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 13–22.
34.
MossbergWalter S., and BoehretKatherine (2006), “Battle of the Boxes: PlayStation 3 vs. Wii,”The Wall Street Journal, (November 29), D1.
35.
MotulskyHarvey, and ChristopoulosArthur (2003), Fitting Models to Biological Data Using Non-Linear Regression.San Diego: GraphPad Software.
36.
MurrayKyle B., and HaublGerald (2007), “Explaining Cognitive Lock-In: The Role of Skill-Based Habits of Use in Consumer Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 77–88.
37.
MyungIn-Jae, KimCheongtag, and PittMark A. (2000), “Toward an Explanation of the Power Law Artifact: Insights from Response Surface Analysis,”Memory & Cognition, 28(5), 832–40.
38.
NewellAllen, and RosenbloomPaul S. (1981), “Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice,” in Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, AndersonJ.R., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1–55.
39.
NickolsFred (2000), “The Knowledge in Knowledge Management (KM),” in The Knowledge Management Yearbook, CortadaJames W., and WoodsJohn A., eds. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
40.
NormanDonald A. (2002), The Design of Everyday Things.New York: Basic Books.
41.
NormanDonald A. (2005), “Human-Centered Design Considered Harmful,”Interactions, 12(4), 14–19.
42.
NovakJoseph D. (2002), “Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners,”Science Education, 86(4), 548–71.
43.
NovakJoseph D., Robert GowinD., and JohansenGerard T. (1983), “The Use of Concept Mapping and Knowledge Vee Mapping with Junior High School Science Students,”Science Education, 67(5), 625–45.
44.
PayneRobert J. (1994), “Thinking Aloud: Insights into Information Processing,”Psychological Science, 5(5), 241–48.
45.
PreacherKristopher J., and HayesAndrew F. (2004), “SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models,”Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–31.
46.
RettigM. (1991), “Nobody Reads Documentation,”Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 19–24.
47.
RickardTimothy C. (1997), “Bending the Power Law: A CMPL Theory of Strategy Shifts and the Automatization of Cognitive Skills,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(3), 288–311.
48.
RickardTimothy C. (1999), “A CMPL Alternative Account of Practice Effects in Numerosity Judgment Tasks,”Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 25(2), 532–42.
49.
RobertsonThomas S., and GatignonHubert (1986), “Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion,”Journal of Marketing, 50(July), 1–12.
50.
ScharerL.L. (1983), “User Training: Less Is More,”Datamation, (July), 175–82.
51.
SchillingMelissa A. (2005), “A ‘Small-World’ Network Model of Cognitive Insight,”Creativity Research Journal, 17(2/3), 131–54.
52.
SchwarzGideon E. (1978), “Estimating the Dimension of a Model,”Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–64.
53.
ShihChuan-Fong, and VenkateshAlladi (2004), “Beyond Adoption: Development and Application of a Use-Diffusion Model,”Journal of Marketing, 68(January), 59–72.
54.
SinkulaJames M. (1994), “Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning,”Journal of Marketing, 58(January), 35–45.
55.
SmithSteven M., WardThomas B., and FinkeRonald A. (1995), The Creative Cognition Approach.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56.
SoodAshish, and TellisGerard J. (2005), “Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation,”Journal of Marketing, 69(July), 152–68.
57.
SquireLarry R. (1986), “Mechanisms of Memory,”Science, 232(4758), 1612–19.
58.
TaatgenNiels A., HussDavid, DickisonDaniel, and AndersonJohn R. (2008), “The Acquisition of Robust and Flexible Cognitive Skills”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(3), 548–65.
59.
ThompsonDebora V., HamiltonRebecca W., and RustRoland T. (2005), “Feature Fatigue: When Product Capabilities Become Too Much of a Good Thing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42(November), 431–42.
60.
Van den HaakMaaike J., and de JongMenno D.T. (2003), “Exploring Two Methods of Usability Testing: Concurrent Versus Retrospective Think-Aloud Protocols,”Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference.New York: IEEE, 285–87.
61.
OsselaerVan, StijnM.J., and AlbaJoseph W. (2000), “Consumer Learning and Brand Equity,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 1–16.
62.
OsselaerVan, StijnM.J., and JaniszewskiChris (2001), “Two Ways of Learning Brand Associations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 202–223.
WatsonDavid, ClarkLee Anna, and TellegenAuke (1988), “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–70.
65.
WebsterDonna M., and KruglanskiArie W. (1994), “Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–62.
66.
WernerfeltBirger (1985), “Brand Loyalty and User Skills,”Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 6(4), 381–85.
67.
WoodStacy L., and Page MoreauC. (2006), “From Fear to Loathing? How Emotion Influences the Evaluation and Early Use of Innovations,”Journal of Marketing, 70(July), 44–57.
68.
WrightPatricia (1983), “Manual Dexterity: A User-Oriented Approach to Creating Computer Documentation,” in Proceedings of the CHI’ 83 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Association for Computing Machinery, JandaA., ed. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 11–18.
69.
YechiamEldad, ErevIdo, and GopherDaniel (2001), “On the Potential Value and Limitations of Emphasis Change and Other Exploration-Enhancing Training Methods,”Journal of Experimental Psychology—Applied, 7(4), 277–85.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
