The authors examine how firms adapt different components of their marketing strategies in foreign markets compared with their domestic market and how such adaptation decisions influence the firms' competitive positions and performance in foreign markets. The authors conceptualize that adaptation of a marketing-mix component is a purposeful process that is influenced by a firm's past adaptation strategy, and they investigate the importance of that marketing-mix component to the firm's success. The authors propose that the adaptation process helps define a firm's competitive advantage, which in turn affects its performance in the foreign market. The authors develop hypotheses and propositions and test them with a sample of 183 export firms in Hong Kong.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AabyN.E. and SlaterS.F. (1989), “Management Influences on Export Performance: A Review of the Empirical Literature 1978–88,” International Marketing Review, 6 (4), 7–26.
2.
AndersonErin M. and GatignonHubert (1986), “Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 17 (3), 1–26.
3.
BradleyM. Frank (1984), “Effects of Cognitive Style, Attitude Toward Growth, and Motivation on the Internationalization of the Firm,” in Research in Marketing, Vol. 7, ShethJagdish, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 237–60.
4.
BuzzellRobert D. (1968), “Can You Standardize Multinational Marketing?” Harvard Business Review, 49 (November/December), 102–13.
5.
CavusgilS. Tamer and ZouShaoming (1994), “Marketing Strategy–Performance Relationship: An Investigation of the Empirical Link in Export Market Ventures,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (January), 1–21.
6.
CavusgilS. Tamer and ZouShaoming, and NaiduG.M. (1993), “Product and Promotion Adaptation in Export Ventures: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (Third Quarter), 479–506.
7.
DeligonulZ. Seyda and CavusgilS. Tamer (1997), “Does the Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition Really Replace the Neoclassical Theory of Perfect Competition?” Journal of Marketing, 61 (October), 65–73.
8.
DouglasSusan P. and CraigSamuel C. (1989), “Evolution of Global Marketing Strategy: Scale, Scope and Synergy,” Columbia Journal of World Business, 24 (Fall), 47–59.
9.
DouglasSusan P. and CraigSamuel C. (1992), “Advances in International Marketing,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9 (4), 291–391.
10.
DouglasSusan P. and WindYoram (1987), “The Myth of Globalization,” Columbia Journal of World Business, 22 (Winter), 47–59.
11.
DunningJohn H. (1988), “The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (Spring), 1–31.
12.
EkeldoI. and SivakumarK. (1998), “Foreign Market Entry Mode Choice of Service Firms: A Contingency Perspective,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26 (Fall), 274–92.
13.
ErramilliM. Krishna and RaoC.P. (1993), “Service Firms' International Entry-Mode Choice: a Modified Transaction-Cost Analysis Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 19–38.
14.
FiegenbaumA. and KarnaniA. (1991), “Output Flexibility: A Competitive Advantage for Small Firms,” Strategic Management Journal, 12 (2), 101–14.
15.
GinsbergA. and VenkatramanN. (1985), “Contingency Perspective of Organizational Strategy: A Critical Review of the Empirical Research,” Academy of Management Review, 10 (3), 421–34.
16.
HarrisGreg (1994), “International Advertising Standardization: What Do the Multinationals Actually Standardize?” Journal of International Marketing, 2 (4), 13–30.
JainSubhash C. (1989), “Standardization of International Marketing Strategy: Some Research Hypotheses,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (January), 70–79.
19.
JohansonJan and VahlneJan-Erik (1977), “The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Commitments,” Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1), 23–32.
20.
JohansonJan and VahlneJan-Erik (1990), “The Mechanism of Internationalization,” International Marketing Review, 7 (4), 11–24.
21.
KeeganW.J. and GreenMark S. (2000), Global Marketing, 2d ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
LevittTheodore (1983), “The Globalization of Markets,” Harvard Business Review, 61 (May/June), 92–102.
23.
MadesenT.K. (1987), “Empirical Export Performance Studies: A Review of Conceptualizations and Findings,” in Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 2, CavusgilS.T., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 177–98.
24.
PanYigang and TseDavid (1996), “Co-operative Strategies of Foreign Firms in an Overseas Country,” Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (5), 929–46.
25.
PerlmutterH.V. (1969), “The Tortuous Evolution of the Multinational Corporation,” Columbia Journal of World Business, 4 (January/February), 9–18.
26.
PinderCraig (1984), Work Motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
27.
RugmanAlan M. (1981), Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets. London: Croom Helm.
28.
SamieeSaeed and RothKendall (1992), “The Influence of Global Marketing Standardization on Performance,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (April), 1–17.
29.
SchwenkC.K. (1985), “The Use of Participant Recollection in the Modelling of Organizational Process,” Academy of Management Review, 10 (3), 496–503.
30.
ShethJagdish N. (1984), “Strategies of Advertising Transferability in Multinational Marketing,” in Current Issues and Research in Advertising, LeighJ., MartinC.R., and ArborA., eds. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, 131–41.
31.
ShohamAviv and AlbaumGerald (1994), “The Effects of Transfer of Marketing Methods on Export Performance: An Empirical Examination,” International Business Review, 3 (3), 219–41.
32.
ShohamAviv, RoseGreg, and AlbaumGerald (1995), “Export Motives, Psychological Distance, and the EPRG Framework,” Journal of Global Marketing, 8 (3/4), 9–37.
33.
SzymanskiDavid M., BharadwajSundar G., and VaradarajanP. Rajan (1993), “Standardization Versus Adaptation of International Marketing Strategy: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (October), 1–17.
34.
TseDavid K., PanYigang, and AuKevin Y. (1997), “How MNCs Choose Entry Modes and Form Alliances: The China Experience,” Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (3), 779–805.
35.
VroomV.H. (1964), Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
36.
WaltersPeter G.P. (1986), “International Marketing Policy: A Discussion of the Standardization Construct and Its Relevance for Corporate Policy,” Journal of International Business Studies, 17 (Summer), 55–69.
37.
WaltersPeter G.P. and ToyneBrian (1989), “Product Modification and Standardization in International Markets: Strategic Options and Facilitating Policies,” Columbia Journal of World Business, 24 (Winter), 37–44.
38.
WindYoram, DouglasSusan, and PerlmutterH.V. (1973), “Guidelines for Developing International Marketing Strategies,” Journal of Marketing, 37 (April), 14–23.
