As multinational corporations engage in technology adoption internationally, it is becoming increasingly important for managers to pursue a process that will ultimately lead to the adoption and effective use of new technology in divergent markets. In this study, the authors explore a technology adoption model (TAM) that is appropriate for the context of China. Employing a sample of 506 Chinese business professionals, they develop and test a modified TAM within the Chinese business culture. The results indicate that the modified TAM works well. The authors discuss implications for international marketing academics and practitioners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamsonE., and RosenkopfL. (1990), “Institutional and Competitive Bandwagons: Using Mathematical Modeling as a Tool to Explore Innovation Diffusion,”Academy of Management Review, 18 (3), 487–517.
2.
AdamsD.A., and NelsonR.R. (1992), “Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication,”MIS Quarterly, 16 (2), 227–47.
3.
AdlerN.J. (1984), “Understanding the Ways of Understanding: Cross-Cultural Management Methodology Reviewed,” in Advances in International Comparative Management, FarmerR., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 31–67.
4.
AgarwalR., and PrasadJ. (1997), “The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies,”Decision Sciences, 28 (3), 557–81.
5.
AgarwalR., and PrasadJ. (1999), “Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?”Decision Sciences, 30 (2), 361–91.
6.
AjzenI., and FishbeinM., eds. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
AndersenT., and NicholsonJ.D. (1999), “Management of Human Resources in China Under WTO,”Business Forum, 24 (3-4), 50–53.
8.
AndersonJ.C. (1987), “An Approach for Confirmatory Measurement and Structural Equation Modeling of Organizational Properties,”Management Science, 33 (4), 525–41.
9.
AndersonJ.C., and GerbingD.W. (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,”Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411–23.
10.
AulakhP.S., KotabeM., and TeegenH. (2000), “Export Strategies and Performance of Firms from Emerging Economies: Evidence from Brazil, Chile, and Mexico,”Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3), 342–61.
11.
BagozziR.P., and YiY. (1988), “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74–94.
12.
BenamatiJ., and FajkumarT.M. (2002), “The Application Development Outsourcing Decision: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model,”Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42 (4), 35–43.
13.
BentlerP.M. (1989), EQS Structural Equations Program Manual.Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
14.
BoisotM., and ChildJ. (1996), “From Fiefs to Clans and Network Capitalism: Explaining China's Emerging Economic Order,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (4), 600–628.
15.
BollenK.A. (1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16.
BoyacigillerN.A., and AdlerN.J. (1991), “The Parochial Dinosaur: Organizational Science in a Global Context,”Academy of Management Review, 16 (2), 262–90.
17.
ChauP.Y.K., and HuP.J.-H. (2001), “Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach,”Decision Sciences, 32 (4), 699–719.
18.
ChenE. (1996), Transnational Corporations and Technology Transfer to Developing Countries.London: Thomson Business Press.
19.
ChungW. (2001), “Identifying Technology Transfer in Foreign Direct Investment, Influence of Industry Conditions and Investing Firm Motives,”Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (2), 211–29.
20.
CooperR.B., and ZmudR.W. (1990), “Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach,”Management Science, 36 (2), 123–39.
21.
DavisF.D. (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,”MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319–40.
22.
DavisF.D., BagozziR.P., and WarshawP.R. (1989), “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two,”Management Science, 35 (8), 982–1003.
23.
Di BenedettoC.A., CalantoneR.J., and ZhangC. (2003), “International Technology Transfer: Model and Exploratory Study in the People's Republic of China,”International Marketing Review, 20 (4), 446–62.
24.
DiMaggioP., and PowellW.W. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,”American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–60.
25.
EvansP. (1995), Embedded Autonomy: States and Transformation.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
FishbeinM., and AjzenI. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introductory to Theory and Research.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
FornellC., and LarckerD.F. (1981), “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (August), 382–88.
28.
GatignonH., and RobertsonT. (1989), “Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects,”Journal of Marketing, 53 (January), 35–49.
29.
GrewalR., and DharwadkarR. (2002), “The Role of the Institutional Environment in Marketing Channels,”Journal of Marketing, 66 (July), 82–97.
30.
GurbaxaniV., KraemerK.L., KingJ.L., JarmanS., DedrickJ., RamanK.S., and YapC.S. (1990), “Government as the Driving Force Toward the Information Society: National Computer Policy in Singapore,”The Information Society, 7 (2), 155–85.
31.
HakansonL., and NobelR. (2000), “Technology Characteristics and Reverse Technology Transfer,”Management International Review, 40 (1), 29–48.
32.
HendricksonA.R., MasseyP.D., and CronanT.P. (1993), “On the Test-Retest Reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales,”MIS Quarterly, 17 (2), 227–30.
HuL.-T., and BentlerP.M. (1999), “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives,”Structural Equations Modeling, 6 (1), 1–55.
35.
IgbariaM., and ZinatelliN. (1997), “Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model,”MIS Quarterly, 21 (3), 279–305.
36.
IrelandJ. (1991), “Finding the Right Management Approach: US Firms Have Difficulty Adapting American Techniques to Chinese Reality,”The China Business Review, (January–February), 14–17.
37.
JarvenpaaS., and LeidnerD. (1998), “An Information Company in Mexico: Extending the Resource-Based View of the Firm to a Developing Country Context,”Information Systems Research, 9 (4), 342–61.
KarahannaE., StraubD.W., and ChervanyN.L. (1999), “Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs,”MIS Quarterly, 23 (2), 183–203.
40.
KediaB.L., and BhagatR.S. (1988), “Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology Across Nations: Implications for International and Comparative Management,”Academy of Management Review, 13 (4), 559–71.
41.
KingJ.L., GurbaxaniV., KraemerK.L., McFarlanF.W., RamanK.S., and YapC.S. (1994), “Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation,”Information Systems Research, 5 (2), 139–69.
42.
KlonglanG.E., and CowardE.W.Jr. (1970), “The Concept of Symbolic Adoption: A Suggested Interpretation,”Rural Sociology, 35 (1), 77–83.
43.
KostovaT., and RothK. (2002), “Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects,”Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1), 215–33.
44.
KoufarisM. (2002), “Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior,”Information Systems Research, 13 (2), 205–223.
45.
KraemerK.L., GurbaxaniV., and KingJ.L. (1992), “Economic Development, Government Policy, and the Diffusion of Computing in Pacific Area Nations,”Public Administration Review, 52 (2), 146–56.
46.
LiH., and Atuahene-GimaK. (2001), “Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China,”Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6), 1123–34.
47.
LiH., and Atuahene-GimaK. (2002), “The Adoption of Agency Business Activity, Product Innovation, and Performance in Chinese Technology Ventures,”Strategic Management Journal, 23 (6), 469–90.
48.
LockettM. (1988), “Culture and the Problems of Chinese Management,”Organization Studies, 9 (4), 475–96.
49.
LuoY. (2001), “Toward a Cooperative View of MNC-Host Government Relations: Building Blocks and Performance Implications,”Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3), 401–19.
50.
MarcotteC., and NiosiJ. (2000), “Technology Transfer to China: The Challenge of Knowledge and Learning,”Journal of Technology Transfer, 25 (1), 43–57.
51.
MathiesonK. (1991), “Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior,”Information Systems Research, 2 (3), 173–91.
52.
MeyerA.D. (2001), “Technology Transfer into China: Preparing for a New Era,”European Management Journal, 19 (2), 140–44.
53.
MooreG.C., and BenbasatI. (1991), “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,”Information Systems Research, 2 (3), 192–222.
54.
PengM.W., and LuoY. (2000), “Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link,”Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3), 486–501.
55.
RalstonD.A., HoltD.H., TerpstraR.H., and YuK.-C. (1997), “The Impact of National Culture and Economic Ideology on Managerial Work Values: A Study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China,”Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (1), 177–207.
56.
RobinsonR.D. (1991), The International Communication of Technology: A Book of Readings.New York: Taylor & Francis.
57.
RogersE.M. (1995), The Diffusion of Innovation.New York: The Free Press.
58.
RoseG., and StraubD.W. (1998), “Predicting General IT Use: Applying TAM to the Arabic World,”Journal of Global Information Management, 6 (3), 39–46.
59.
ScarboroughJ. (1998), “Comparing Chinese and Western Cultural Roots: Why ‘East Is East and…,'”Business Horizons, 41 (6), 15–24.
60.
SchlevogtK.-A. (2002), “Management and Organization in the Chinese Context,”Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (3), 629–32.
61.
SegarsA.H., and GroverV. (1993), “Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis,”MIS Quarterly, 17 (4), 517–25.
62.
SpeierC., and VenkateshV. (2002), “The Hidden Minefields in the Adoption of Sales Force Automation Technologies,”Journal of Marketing, 66 (July), 98–111.
63.
SteinmullerE.W. (2001), “ICTs and the Possibilities of Leapfrogging by Developing Countries,”International Labors Review, 140 (2), 193–210.
64.
StraubD., LimayemM., and Karahanna-EvaristoE. (1995), “Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing,”Management Science, 41 (8), 1328–42.
65.
TangJ., WardA., and JieT. (2003), The Changing Face of Chinese Management.New York: Routledge.
66.
TaylorS., and ToddP.A. (1995a), “Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience,”MIS Quarterly, 19 (4), 561–70.
67.
TaylorS., and ToddP.A. (1995b), “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,”Information Systems Research, 6 (2), 144–76.
68.
ThompsonR.L., HigginsC.A., and HowellJ.M. (1991), “Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization,”MIS Quarterly, 15 (1), 124–43.
69.
TihanyiL., and RoathA.S. (2002), “Technology Transfer and Institutional Development in Central and Eastern Europe,”Journal of World Business, 37 (3), 188–98.
70.
TornatzkyL.G., and KlienK.J. (1982), “Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings,”IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29 (1), 28–45.
71.
TriandisH.C. (1971), Attitude and Attitude Change.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
72.
TsangE.W.K. (1998), “Can Guanxi Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage for Doing Business in China?”The Academy of Management Executive, 12 (2), 64–73.
73.
VenkateshV. (1999), “Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation,”MIS Quarterly, 23 (2), 239–60.
74.
VenkateshV., and DavisF.D. (2000), “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,”Management Science, 46 (2), 186–204.
75.
VenkateshV., MorrisM.G., DavisG.B., and DavisF.D. (2003), “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,”MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425–78.
76.
WadeJ. (2004), “The Pitfalls of Cross-Cultural Business,”Risk Management, 51 (3), 38–42.
77.
WestphalJ.D., GulatiR., and ShortellS.M. (1997), “Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (2), 366–94.
