International marketing research plays a vital role as firms expand globally. Yet limited attention has been paid to the conceptual underpinnings of research needed to guide expansion. This article focuses on these issues and specifically examines the conceptual framework that guides research, the geographic units of analysis, and the constructs. The authors suggest two alternative approaches to organizing cross-cultural research: the adapted etic and the linked emic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakerJennifer, Benet-MartínezVeronica, and GaroleraJordi (2001), “Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constructs,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 492–508.
2.
AndaleebSyed Saad, and AnwarSyed Ferhat (1996), “Factors Influencing Customer Trust in Salespersons in a Developing Country,”Journal of International Marketing, 4(4), 35–52.
3.
ArmstrongRobert W., and YeeSiew Min (2001), “Do Chinese Trust Chinese? A Study of Chinese Buyers and Sellers in Malaysia,”Journal of International Marketing, 9(3), 63–86.
4.
BaumgartnerHans, and SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. (2001), “Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38(May), 143–56.
5.
BerryJ.W. (1969), “On Cross-Cultural Comparability,”International Journal of Psychology, 4(2), 119–28.
6.
BontempoR. (1993), “Translation Fidelity of Psychological Scales,”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24(2), 149–66.
7.
BrislinRobert W. (1980), “Translation and Content Analyses of Oral and Written Material,” in Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 1, TriandisH.C., and BerryJ.W., eds. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 389–444.
8.
CraigC. Samuel, and DouglasSusan P. (2005), International Marketing Research, 3d ed. London: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
CuiGeng, and LiuQiming (2001), “Emerging Market Segments in a Transitional Economy: A Study of Urban Consumers in China,”Journal of International Marketing, 9(1), 84–106.
10.
DeregowskiJ.B., and SerpellRobert (1971), “Performance on a Sorting Task: A Cross-Cultural Experiment,”International Journal of Psychology, 6, 273–81.
11.
HambletonR.K. (1993), “Translating Achievement Tests for Use in Cross-National Studies,”European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 57–68.
12.
HambletonR.K. (1994), “Guidelines for Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests: A Progress Report,”European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229–44.
13.
HofstedeGeert (1980), Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
HofstedeGeert (2001), Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Cultures.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15.
HuiC. Harry, and TriandisHarry C. (1983), “Multistrategy Approach to Cross-Cultural Research: The Case of Focus of Control,”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14(March), 65–83.
16.
KeillorBruce D., TomasG., HultM., and KandemirDestan (2004), “A Study of Service Encounters in Eight Countries,”Journal of International Marketing, 12(1), 9–35.
17.
KleinJill G., EttensonRichard, and MorrisMarlene D. (1998), “The Animosity Model of Foreign Product Purchase: An Empirical Test in the People's Republic of China,”Journal of Marketing, 62(January), 89–100.
18.
KuadaJohn, and BuatsiSeth N. (2005), “Market Orientation and Management Practices in Ghanaian Firms: Revisiting the Jaworski and Kohli Framework,”Journal of International Marketing, 13(1), 58–88.
19.
LeeJ.A. (1966), “Cultural Analysis in Overseas Operations,”Harvard Business Review, 44(March-April), 106–111.
20.
MaddenThomas J., HewettKelly, and RothMartin S. (2000), “Managing Images in Different Cultures: A Cross-National Study of Color Meanings and Preferences,”Journal of International Marketing, 8(4), 90–107.
21.
MullenMichael R. (1995), “Diagnosing Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research,”Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 573–96.
22.
MyersMatthew B., CalantoneRoger J., PageThomas J.Jr., and TaylorCharles R. (2000), “An Application of Multiple-Group Causal Models in Assessing Cross-Cultural Measurement Equivalence,”Journal of International Marketing, 8(4), 108–121.
23.
NakataCheryl, and HuangYili (2002), “Progress and Promise: The Last Decade of International Marketing Research,”AMA Educators’ Proceedings: Enhancing Knowledge Development in Marketing, Vol. 13, WilliamJ. Kehoe, and LindgrenJohn H.Jr., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 306–307.
24.
NakataCheryl, and SivakumarK. (2001), “Instituting the Marketing Concept in a Multinational Setting: The Role of National Culture,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(3), 255–75.
25.
NarollRaoul (1970), “The Culture-Bearing Unit in Cross-Cultural Surveys,” in The Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology, Raoul Narolland, CohenR., eds. New York: Natural History Press, 721–65.
26.
NijssenEdwin J., and DouglasSusan P. (2004), “Examining the Animosity Model in a Country with a High Level of Foreign Trade,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(1), 23–38.
27.
PowpakaSamart (1998), “Factors Affecting the Adoption of Market Orientation: The Case of Thailand,”Journal of International Marketing, 6(1), 33–55.
28.
SchwartzS.H. (1992), “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, ZannaM., ed. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1–65.
29.
SekaranUma (1983), “Methodological and Theoretical Issues and Advancements in Cross-Cultural Research,”Journal of International Business Studies, 15(Fall), 61–73.
30.
SinLeo Y.M., TseAlan C.B., YauOliver H.M., ChowRaymond P.M., and LeeJenny S.Y. (2005), “Market Orientation, Relationship Marketing Orientation, and Business Performance: The Moderating Effects of Economic Ideology and Industry Type,”Journal of International Marketing, 13(1), 36–57.
31.
SongX. Michael, Montoya-WeissMitzi M., and SchmidtJeffrey B. (1997), “The Role of Marketing in Developing Successful New Products in South Korea and Taiwan,”Journal of International Marketing, 5(3), 47–70.
32.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., and BaumgartnerHans (1998), “Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 25(June), 78–90.
33.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., and HofstedeFrenkel Ter (2002), “International Market Segmentation: Issues and Outlook,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(3), 185–213.
34.
Ter HofstedeFrenkel, SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M., and WedelMichel (1999), “International Market Segmentation Based on Consumer-Product Relations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(February), 1–17.
35.
Ter HofstedeFrenkel, WedelMichel, and SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. (2002), “Identifying Spatial Segments in International Markets,”Marketing Science, 21(Spring), 160–77.
36.
ThelenShawn T., and HoneycuttEarl D.Jr. (2004), “Assessing National Identity in Russia Between Generations Using the National Identity Scale,”Journal of International Marketing, 12(2), 58–81.
37.
TriandisHarry C. (1972), The Analysis of Subjective Culture.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
TriandisHarry C., McCluskerChristopher, and Harry HuiC. (1990), “Multi-method Probes of Individualism and Collectivism,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(November), 1006–1020.
39.
Van de VijverFons, and LeungKwok (1997), Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
40.
Van RaaijW. Fred (1978), “Cross-Cultural Research Methodology as a Case of Construct Validity,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, HuntKeith, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association of Consumer Research, 693–701.
41.
ViswanathanMadhubalan, ChildersTerry L., and MooreElizabeth S. (2000), “The Measurement of Intergenerational Communication and Influence on Consumption: Development, Validation and Cross-Cultural Comparison of the IGEN Scale,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(3), 406–424.
42.
WernerO., and CampbellD. (1970), “Translating, Working Through Interpreters and the Problem of Decentering,” in A Handbook of Method in Cultural Anthropology, NarollR., and CohenR., eds. New York: American Museum of Natural History, 398–420.
