This article examines the relationship between the concept of legitimacy and the power to punish in modern society. It argues that the rise of penal populism is related to the way in which criminal justice elites steadily lost legitimacy in the post-1970s period. However, it goes on to argue, using New Zealand as an illustration, that there are limits to the power of penal populism. It too can lose its legitimacy when it breaches the boundaries of morally justifiable punishment levels or when it loses consent for what it promises to do.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
A punishing regime. (2005, January 8). The Dominion Post, p. 3.
2.
BalvigF. (2004). When law and order returned to Denmark. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 5, 167–187.
3.
BeckettK. (2005, November). Criminalizing space: the transformation of urban social control. Paper presented at 57th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Fairmont Royal York Hotel, Toronto, Canada.
4.
BeethamD. (1991). The legitimation of power: Issues in political theory. London: Macmillan.
5.
Blair attacks the justice gap. (2006, June 23). BBC News.
6.
Blair comes out fighting as he admits mistakes and says he is ready to listen. (2006, September 27). The Guardian, p. 6.
7.
BlumsteinA.WallmanJ. (2006). The crime drop and beyond. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 15–146.
8.
BottomsA.E. (1980). Introduction. In BottomsA.E.PrestonR.H. (Eds.), The coming penal crisis (pp. 1–30). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
9.
BottomsA.E. (1995). The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In ClarksonC.MorganR. (Eds.), The politics of sentencing reform (pp. 17–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
BrashD. (2004, July). Law and order: A National priority. Speech to National Sensible Sentencing Trust Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.
11.
BrownD. (2005). Continuity, rupture or just more of the ‘volatile and contradictory’?: Glimpses of New South Wales' penal practice behind and through the discursive. In PrattJ.BrownD.HallsworthS.BrownM.MorrisonW. (Eds.), The new punitiveness: Theories, trends, perspectives (pp. 27–46). Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
12.
Call to stop inmates marrying behind bars. 2006, September 4). The Press, pp. A1, A3.
13.
CavadinoM.DignanJ. (1994). The penal system. London: Sage.
14.
Cells cost five times more than a decent home. (2006, January 20.) The Dominion Post, p. A2.
CookD. (2002). Deregulation and broadcast news content: ONE network news 1984 to 1996. In FarnsworthJ.HutchinsonI. (Eds.), New Zealand television: A reader (pp. 139–144), Palmerston North, NZ: Dunmore Press.
17.
Crackdown blamed for jammed New Zealand prisons. (2006, February 15). New Zealand Herald, p. A3.
18.
Crime and old Labour's punishment. (1998, April 8), The Times, 1998, p. 16.
19.
Crime victims owed $60m. (2005, December 19). The Dominion Post, p. 1
20.
DavisM. (1992). City of quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. New York: Vintage Books.
21.
DeanM. (1976). The news media's influence in penal policy. In WalkerN. (ed.), Penal policy making in England (pp. 25–36), Cambridge, UK: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
22.
DomanickJ. (2004). Cruel justice: Three strikes and the politics of crime in America's golden state. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
23.
FoucaultM. (1987). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1. New York: Pantheon.
24.
FurediF. (2004) Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. London: Routledge.
25.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. NewYork: Free Press.
26.
GarlandD. (2001). The culture of control. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
GiddensA. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
Government bids to cut jail numbers by third. (2006, February 14). New Zealand Herald, p. 3
29.
Government demands answers over decision to parole fugitive murderer. (2007, January 6). New Zealand Herald, p. A5.
30.
Government giving up on prison work. (2006, April 6). The Otago Daily Times, p. 4.
31.
Grieving father vows to demand answers as Parole Board admits conditions were not met. (2007, January 9). New Zealand Herald, p. A1.
32.
HamaiK.EllisT. (2008). Japanese criminal justice. Punishment and Society10, 25–46.
33.
High Prison Rate Political, says Professor (2006, May 13). The Dominion Post, p. A8
34.
HoughM.MayhewP. (1983). The British Crime Survey: First report. London: HMSO.
35.
How dangerous fugitive knifed stranger to death. (2007, January 6). The Dominion Post, p. A3
36.
‘Huge leap’ in suicide bids by inmates. (2005, June 27). The Dominion Post, p. A5.
37.
Inmates kept in vans on streets. (2005, October 25). The Dominion Post, p. A3.
38.
JacobsonM. (2005). Downsizing prisons: How to reduce crime and end mass incarceration. New York: New York University Press.
39.
Jail lets sex crims out to pick fruit. (2006, February 28). The Dominion Post, p. A1.
40.
Jails policy a ‘disgrace’, government told by Law Commission. (2006, May 15). New Zealand Herald, p. A3
41.
Jail rehab worse than nothing. (2006, February 16). New Zealand Herald, p. A3.
42.
Jail term cut on appeal. (2006, September 16). The Press, p. 4.
43.
JanusE. (2006). Failure to protect: America's sexual predator laws and the rise of the preventive state. New York: Cornell University Press.
44.
JewkesY. (2004). Media and crime. London: Sage.
45.
Just locking up prisoners a futile policy. (2006, March 20). The Christchurch Press, p. 10.
46.
Killing turns spotlight on parole system. (2007, January 10). The Christchurch Press, p. A1.
47.
Labour Party (1964). Crime: A challenge to us all, London: Labour Party.
48.
Lappi-SeppaälaT. (2000). The fall of the Finnish prison population. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 1, 27–40.
49.
Law Commission. (2006). Sentencing guidelines and parole reform. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
50.
LoaderI. (2006). Fall of the ‘platonic guardians’: Liberalism, criminology and political responses to crime in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 561–586.
51.
Locked up but taking liberties. (2005, April, 9). The Dominion Post, 2005, p. A8.
52.
Longer sentences have led to jail crises says top judge. (2007, November 16). The Guardian, p. 1
53.
McGregorJ. (1993). Crime news as prime news in New Zealand's metropolitan press, Auckland, New Zealand: Legal Research Foundation.
54.
Ministry of Justice. (2002). Reforming the criminal justice system. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Justice.
55.
MoriartyM. (1976). The policy making process. How it is seen from the Home Office. In WalkerN. (Ed.), Penal policy making in England (pp. 129–145). Cambridge: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
56.
Mum attacks compo for girl's killer. (2005, February 17). The Dominion Post, p. 3
57.
New jails break the building budget by $140 Million. (2006, January 19). New Zealand Herald, p. 3.
58.
NewburnT.JonesT. (2005). Symbolic politics and penal populism: The long shadow of Willie Horton. Crime, Media, Culture, 1, 72–87.
59.
New Zealand Parliament. (2004). Prisoners and Victims Claims Bill, New Zealand Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) 622, p. 17986.
60.
New Zealand prisons are full of the mad, sad and the bad. (2006, March 9). Otago Daily Times, p. 3
61.
O'Connor defends ‘open’ prisons. (2006, February 15). The Dominion Post, p. 4
62.
Office of the Ombudsmen. (2005). Ombudsmen's investigation of the Department of Corrections in relation to the detention and treatment of prisoners. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
63.
Our idle jails. (2006, February 25–March 6). The New Zealand Herald.
64.
Our prison policy is ineffective and too expensive. (2006, March 11). The Christchurch Press, p. 2.
65.
Parole shake-up a big con. (2006, April 24). Sensible Sentencing Trust press release.
66.
Police station stretched to accommodate remands. (2005, May 23). Otago Daily Times, p. 1
67.
PrattJ. (2002). Punishment and civilization: Penal tolerance and intolerance in modern society. London: Sage.
PrattJ.ClarkM. (2005). Penal populism in New Zealand. Punishment & Society, 7, 303–322.
70.
Prison blowout ‘half a billion’. (2006, January 21). The Dominion Post, p. A2.
71.
Prison Fellowship Trust. (2006). Beyond retribution: Advancing the law and order debate. Upper Hutt, New Zealand: Prison Fellowship Trust.
72.
Prison numbers set to explode. (2006, February 25). The Dominion Post, p. A10.
73.
Prison rehab courses a flop. (2006, March 8). The Dominion Post, p. A1.
74.
Prisoners of a flawed system. (2006, February 28). The Dominion Post, p. A4.
75.
Public too quick to judge when it comes to crime. (2006, July 26.) New Zealand Herald, p. A3.
76.
ReinerR. (2007). Law and Order: An honest citizen's guide to crime and control. Cambridge: Polity Press.
77.
Rethink on failed jail policy vital. (2006, March 6). New Zealand Herald, p. A10.
78.
RobertsJ.V.StalansL.IndermaurD.HoughM. (2003). Penal populism and public opinion. New York: Oxford University Press.
79.
RobertsJ.V. (2003). Sentencing reform in New Zealand: an analysis of the Sentencing Act 2002. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 36, 249–271.
80.
RyanM. (2003). Penal policy and political culture in England and Wales. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press.
81.
SavelsbergJ. (1994). Knowledge, domination and criminal punishment. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 911–943.
82.
Shot man's family may sue. (2007, January 29). The Dominion Post, p. A1.
83.
SimonJ. (1995). They died with their boots on: The boot camp and the limits of modern penality. Social Justice, 22, 25–49.
84.
SimonJ. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. New York: Oxford University Press.
85.
SmithL.RobinsonB. (2006). Beyond the holding tank: Pathways to rehabilitative and restorative prison policy. Manukau, New Zealand: The Salvation Army Social Policy and Parliamentary Unit.
86.
SparksR. (1994). Can prisons be legitimate? Penal politics, privatization, and the timeliness of an old idea. British Journal of Criminology, 34, 14–28.
SquiresP.StephenD.E. (2005). Rougher justice: Anti-social behaviour and young people. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
89.
SteenS.BandyR. (2007). When the policy becomes the problem: Criminal justice in the new millennium. Punishment & Society, 9, p. 5–26.
90.
2600 more prisoners given early release. (2007, December 3). Daily Telegraph, p. 1
91.
TonryM. (2007). Determinants of Penal Policies. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime, punishment, and politics in comparative perspective (pp. 1–48). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
92.
Tougher laws to raise jail numbers. (2004, March 10). The Dominion Post, p. 3.
93.
TylerT.BoeckmannR. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law and Society Review, 31, 237–265.
94.
van KesterenJ.N.MayhewP.NieuwbeertaP. (2000). Criminal victimisation in seventeen industrialised countries: Key-findings from the 2000 International Crime Victims Survey?. The Hague: Ministry of Justice, WODC.
