Border-policing has been the subject of increasing criminological concern in the US and Europe: however, it has garnered relatively little attention in Australia. This article addresses the federal border-policing effort that has contributed to policing out the refugee. It has done so through a focus on people-smuggling that has increasingly relied on public debate depicting people-smuggling as a matter of national security. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) has made significant contributions to debates that have considered people-smuggling a matter for law enforcement. This article argues that through an analysis of AFP reports we can trace how they have contributed to the construction of the people-smuggling problem. In drawing on international-relations theory, notably concepts of statecraft and transversality, the article concludes that the AFP has made a central contribution to a wider attack on refugee protection with far-reaching consequences for the nature of federal law enforcement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amnesty International. (2003). Amnesty International annual report. London: Author.
2.
AndreasP. (2000). Border games:Policing the US—Mexico divide. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
3.
Australian Federal Police. (1996–7). Australian Federal Police annual report 1996–1997. Sydney, Australia: Author.
4.
Australian Federal Police. (1997–8). Australian Federal Police Annual Report 1997–1998. Sydney, Australia: Author.
5.
Australian Federal Police. (1998–9). Australian Federal Police Annual Report 1998–1999. Sydney, Australia: Author.
6.
Australian Federal Police. (1999–2000). Australian Federal Police Annual Report 1999–2000. Sydney, Australia: Author.
7.
Australian Federal Police. (2000–01). Australian Federal Police Annual Report 2000–2001. Sydney, Australia: Author.
8.
BBC. (2003a, October 18). Lawyer heads Mexico murder probe, BBC News. Retrieved January 4 2004, from http://news.bbc.co.uk
9.
BBC. (2003b, July 24). Women killed on Mexican border, BBC News. Retrieved January 4, 2004 from http://news.bbc.co.uk
BrownC. (2002). Sovereignty, rights and justice: International political theory today. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BurkeA. (2001). In fear of security. Sydney, Australia: Pluto Press.
13.
CharlesworthH. (2001). Writing on rights: Australia and the protection of human rights. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
14.
DevetakR. (2001). Postmodernism. In BurchillS.DevetakR.LinklaterA.PatersonM.Reus-SmitC.TrueJ.Theories of international relations. New York: Palgrave.
15.
DevetakR. (1995). Incomplete States: Theories and practices of statecraft. In MacmillanJ.LinklaterA. (Eds.), Boundaries in question. London: Pinter.
16.
DotyR. (1996). Sovereignty and the nation: Constructing the boundaries of national identity. In BierstekerT.WeberC. (Eds.), State sovereignty as social construct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
EdelmanM. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
EschbachK. (1999). Death at the border. International Migration Review, 33.
FergusonR. (1998). Representing race: Ideology, identity and the media. London: Arnold.
21.
GlissantE. (1989). Caribbean discourse. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
22.
GreenP.GrewcockM. (2002). The war against illegal immigration: State crime and the construction of a European identity. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 14, 87–101.
23.
HallS. (1990). The whites of their eyes: Racist ideologies and the media. In AlvaradoM.ThompsonJ.O. (Eds.), The media reader. (pp. 1–10). London: British Film Institute.
24.
JamesS.SuttonA. (1994). Criminology and crime control in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 27, 1–10.
25.
McCorquodaleR. (2001). International law, boundaries and imagination. In MillerD.HashmiS. (Eds.), Boundaries and justice: Diverse ethical perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
NevinsJ. (2002). Operation gatekeeper: The rise of the ‘illegal alien’ and the making of the US-Mexico boundary. New York: Routledge.
28.
PangalanganR. (2002). Territorial sovereignty: Command title and expanding claims of the commons. In MillerD.HashmiS. (Eds.), Boundaries and justice: Diverse ethical perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
PickeringS. (2004, forthcoming). Border terror: Policing, forced migration and terrorism. Journal of Global Change, Peace and Security, 15.
30.
PickeringS. (2001). Common sense and original deviancy: News discourses and asylum seekers in Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 14, 169–186.
31.
OrwellG. (1970). A collection of essays. London: Harvest.
32.
Reus-SmitC. (2001). Human rights and the social construction of sovereignty. Review of International Studies, 27, 519–538.
33.
Saint-GermainM. (1995). Similarities and differences in perceptions of public service among public administrators on the US-Mexico border. Public Administration Review, 55, 507–516.
34.
SassenS. (1999). Guests and aliens. New York: The New Press.
35.
SassenS. (1996). Sovereignty in an age of globalisation. New York: Columbia University Press.
36.
SogukN. (1999). States and strangers: Refugees and displacements of statecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
SogukN.WhitehallG. (1999). Wandering grounds: Transversality, identity, territoriality, and movement. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 28, 675–698.
38.
TillyC. (1995). War making and state making as organized crime. In EvansP.RueschemeyerD.SkocpolT. (Eds.), Bringing the state back in. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Van DijkT. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In SchiffrinD.TannenD.HamiltonH. (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. (pp. 352–371). London: Blackwell.
40.
YoungA. (1996). Imagining crime. London: Sage.
41.
YoungA. (1990). Femininity in dissent. London: Routledge.
42.
WeberC. (1995). Simulating sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
