This article is a response to the critique of the author's PhD thesis methodology and findings presented in Judith Buckingham's article titled “Newsmaking Criminology” or “Infotainment” Criminology? It explains in more detail the author's thesis study and provides responses to Buckingham's arguments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenH. (1987). Justice unbalanced: Gender, psychiatry and judicial decisions. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
2.
ChannelsN.L.HerzbergerS.D. (1993). The role of gender in pretrial decision making. In CulliverC.C. (Ed.), Female criminality: The state of the art. New York: Garland Publishers.
3.
DalyK. (1989a). Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions. Crime and Delinquency, 35(1), 136–168.
4.
DalyK. (1989b). Rethinking judicial paternalism: Gender, work-family relations, and sentencing. Gender and Society, 3(1), 9–36.
5.
DalyK. (1989c). Criminal justice ideologies and practices in different voices: Some feminist questions about justice. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 17, 1–18.
6.
DalyK. (1994). Gender, crime, and punishment. New Haven: Yale University Press.
7.
DalyK.BordtR.L. (1995). Gender effect and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12(1), 142–175.
8.
EatonM. (1986). Justice for women? Family; court and social control. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
9.
HaganJ.BumillerK. (1983). Making sense of sentencing: A review and critique of sentencing research. In BlumsteinA.CohenJ.MartinS.E.TonryM.H. (Eds.), Research on sentencing: The search for reform. Washington: National Academy Press.
10.
HeidensohnF. (1996). Women and crime (2nd ed.). London: MacMillan Press.
11.
HusakD.N. (1998). Desert, proportionality, and the seriousness of drug offences. In AshworthA.WasikM. (Eds.), Fundamentals of sentencing theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12.
JeffriesS. (2001). Gender judgments: An investigation of gender differentiation in sentencing and remand in New Zealand. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
13.
JeffriesS. (2002a). Just or unjust? Problematising the gendered nature of criminal justice. Women's Studies Journal, 18(1), 24–41.
14.
JeffriesS. (2002b). Does gender really matter? Criminal court decision making in New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology, 17(1), 135–149.
15.
JeffriesS.FletcherG.J.O.NewboldG. (2003). Pathways to gender-based differentiation in criminal court Sentencing. Criminology, 41(1), 329–353.
16.
KruttschnittC. (1982). Women, crime, and dependency: An application of the theory of law. Criminology, 19(4), 495–513.
17.
NagelI. (1981). Gender differences in the processing of criminal defendants. In MorrisA.GelsthorpeL. (Eds.), Women and crime: Cropwood conference Series No. 13. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute of Criminology.
18.
UssherJ. (1991). Women's madness: Misogyny or mental illness?New York: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
19.
WalklateS. (1995). Gender and crime: An introduction. London: Prentice Hall Harvester Wheatsheaf.
20.
WorrallA. (1990). Offending women: Female lawbreakers and the criminal justice system. London: Routledge.
