This article takes up a strange paradox or dissonance that characterises
contemporary crime prevention, particularly in Australia. On the one hand, there
is an ample literature pointing out the conceptual and practical drawbacks of
“community” or more broadly of
“communalism” (incorporating social capital) in crime
prevention; on the other, policy and practice seem largely oblivious to these
difficulties and hence, by extension, to the need for more appropriate
conceptual formulations upon which to base collective approaches to crime
prevention.The article is in two parts. The first traces the allure and the
difficulties of communalism in general and in crime prevention in particular. In
traversing what may be in some respects well enough known terrain, it underlines
that until we recognise the innate difficulties with this conceptual framework,
crime prevention will not face up to the challenge of developing new and more
appropriate foundations for a collectively based approach in this policy arena.
An attempt to address this challenge is taken up in the second part of the
article.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsD.HessM. ( 2001). Community in public policy:
Fad or Foundation?. Australian Journal of Public
Administration, 60(2),
13-23.
2.
AlbrowM. (2001). Society as social diversity: The
challenge for governance in the global age. In Governance in the 21st
century (pp. 149–182).
Brussels:
OECD.
3.
ArmstrongA.FrancisR.DussuyerI. (2002). Evaluating the community governance
of crime prevention and community safety. Project Advisory Committee
Report. Crime Prevention, Victoria and Victoria
University of Technology:
Melbourne.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2001). Draft ABS Social Capital
Framework. Melbourne:
Author.
BaumanZ. (2001). Community: Seeking safety in an
insecure world. Cambridge:
Polity Press.
7.
BebbingtonA.WoolcockM. et al. (2002). Grounding discourse
in practice: Exploring social capital debates at the World
Bank. Mimeograph.
8.
BeckU. (1994). The reinvention of politics:
Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In
BeckU.GiddensA.LashS. (Eds.), Reflexive modernization (pp.
1–55). Cambridge:
Polity Press.
9.
BlacherY. (2003). Connecting with citizens:
The role of government in service delivery. Address
to Institute of Public Administration,
Melbourne.
10.
BottomsA.WilesP. (1996). Crime prevention and late
modernity. Crime prevention: The Cropwood papers.
Cambridge: Institute of
Criminology.
BradleyT.WaltersR. (2002). The managerialisation of
crime prevention and community safety. In HughesG. et al. (Eds.), Crime prevention and community safety
(pp. 240–259). London:
Sage.
13.
BraithwaiteJ.StrangH. (2001). Restorative justice and
civil society. In StrangH.BraithwaiteJ. (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society (pp.
1–13). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
14.
CherneyA. (2003). The dust never settles: Crime
prevention policy and practice — The Victorian
experience. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Melbourne,
Melbourne.
15.
ColemanJ. (1990). The foundations of social
theory. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
16.
CostelloP. (2003, July). Building social
capital. Address to the Sydney Institute.
17.
CrawfordA. (1998). Crime prevention and community
safety. Harlow:
Longman.
18.
CrawfordA. (2001). Joined-up but fragmented:
Contradiction, ambiguity and ambivalence at the heart of New Labour's
‘Third Way’. In MatthewsR.PittJ. (Eds.), Crime disorder and community safety (pp.
54‘80). London:
Routledge.
19.
Crime Prevention Victoria. (2002). Safer streets and homes: A crime
and violence prevention strategy for Victoria.
Melbourne: Government of
Victoria.
20.
DeanM. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in
modern society. London:
Sage.
21.
DenchG. (1986). Minorities in the open society:
Prisoners of ambivalence. London:
Routledge & Kegan Paul.
22.
DonnellyK. (2003, August 25). Why social
capital is really the preserve of conservatives. The
Age.
23.
DurkheimE. (1933). The division of labour in
society. Chicago: Free
Press.
24.
EdwardsA.HughesG. (2002). The community governance of
crime control. In HughesG.EdwardsA. (Eds.), Crime control and community: The new politics of
public safety (pp. 1–20).
Cullompton:
Willan.
25.
EdwardsB.FoleyM. (2001). Civil society and social
capital: A primer. In EdwardsB.FoleyM.DianiM. (Eds.), Beyond tocqueville.
Hanover: University of New
England Press.
26.
EtzioniA. (1993). The spirit of community.
New York: Simon and
Schuster.
27.
European Forum for Urban Safety. (2003). The migration immigration theme in
local crime prevention strategies. Working
Paper.
28.
FineB. (2001). Social capital versus social
theory. London:
Routledge.
29.
FineB. (2002). It ain't social, it ain't capital
and it ain't Africa. Mimeograph.
30.
FineB. (2003). Social capital: The World
Bank's fungible friend. Journal of Agrarian
Change, 3(4),
596-603.
31.
GadsdenH.HendersonM. (2003) Good practice in community crime
prevention models.
Sydney.
32.
GarlandD. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and
social order in contemporary society.
Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
33.
GiddensA. (1994). Living in a post-traditional
society. In BeckU.GiddensA.LashScott. Reflexive modernization (pp.
56–110). Cambridge:
Polity Press.
34.
GiddensA. (1998). The third way: The renewal of
social democracy. Cambridge:
Polity Press.
35.
GiddensA. (2000). The third way and its
critics. Cambridge:
Polity Press.
36.
GoldsmithO. (1779). The deserted
village.
37.
GrootaertC.Van BastalaerT. (Eds.). (2002). The role of social capital
in development: An empirical assessment.
Cambridge: Harvard University
Press.
38.
HancockL.MetthewsR. (2001). Crime, community safety and
tolerance. In MatthewsR.PittJ. (Eds.), Crime, disorder and community safety (pp.
98–119). London:
Routledge.
39.
Herbert-CheshireL. (2000). Contemporary strategies for
rural community development in Australia: A governmentality
perspective. Journal of Rural Studies,
16, 203-215.
40.
HessM.AdamsA. (2002). Knowing and skilling in
contemporary public administration. Australian
Journal of Public Administration,
61(4),
68-79.
41.
HigginsV. (2001). Calculating climate:
‘Advanced liberalism’ and the governing of risk in
Australian drought policy. Journal of
Sociology, 37(3),
299-316.
42.
HobsbawmE. (1994). Age of extremes.
London:
Abacus.
43.
HoggR.BrownD. (1998). Rethinking law and order.
Annandale, NSW:
Pluto.
44.
HomelP. (2003). I just know it's the right
approach! Improving the effectiveness of community based crime
prevention. Paper presented to the Australian and New Zealand
Society of Criminology Conference, Sydney.
45.
HopeT. (1995). Community crime
prevention. In TonryM.FarringtonD. (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches
to crime (pp. 56–73).
Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
46.
HopeT.KarstedtS. (2003). Towards a new social crime
prevention. In KuryH.Obergfell-FuchsJ., Crime prevention: New approaches.
Mainz: Weisser
Ring.
47.
HughesG. (1998). Understanding crime
prevention. Buckingham:
Open University Press.
48.
HughesG. (2002a). The Audit culture and
disorder reducing partnerships: Exorcising the wicked issue of community
safety. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An
International Journal, 4(2),
9-18.
49.
HughesG. (2002b). Plotting the rise of
community safety: Reflections on research, theory and
politics. In HughesG.EdwardsA., Crime control and community: The new politics of public
safety (pp. 20–45).
Cullompton:
Willan.
50.
HughesG. (2003). Beyond
“community” safety? Explorations in the new governance
of public safety in Europe.
Mimeograph.
51.
HughesG.McLaughlinE.MuncieJ. (Eds.). (2002). Crime prevention and
community safety: New directions.
London:
Sage.
52.
KnightB. (1999). Community
politics. In CampbellD.LewisN.D. (Eds.), Promoting participation: Law or politics (pp.
175–181). London:
Cavendish.
53.
LaceyN.ZednerL. (1998). Community in German criminal
justice: A significant Absence?. Social and Legal
Studies, 7(1),
7-25.
54.
LashS. (1994). Expert systems or situated
interpretation? In BeckU.GiddensA.LashS., Reflexive modernization.
Cambridge: Polity
Press.
55.
LathamM. (2003, August 18).How governments
can nurture better neighbourhoods. The
Age.
56.
MatthewsR.PittJ. (Eds.). (2001). Crime reduction and
community safety. London:
Routledge.
57.
McLaughlinE. (2002). The crisis of the social and
the political materialization of community safety. In
HughesG.McLaughlinE.MuncieJ. (Eds.), Crime prevention and community safety.
London:
Sage.
58.
MorenoffJ.SampsonR.RaudenbushS. (2001). Neighbourhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the
spatial dynamics of urban violence. Research Report, Population Studies Center,
University of Michigan.
59.
NelkenD. (2000). Telling difference of crime
and criminal justice in Italy. In NelkenD. (Ed.), Contrasting Criminal Justice (pp.
233–64). Aldershot:
Ashgate.
60.
OECD. (2001). Governance in the 21st
century. Brussels:
Author.
61.
O'MalleyP. (1992). Risk, power and crime
prevention. Economy and Society,
21(3),
252-275.
62.
O'MalleyP. (1997). The politics of crime
prevention. In O'MalleyP.SuttonA. (Eds.), Crime prevention in Australia —
Issues in policy and research.
Sydney: Federation
Press.
63.
O'MalleyP.SuttonA. (Eds.). (1997). Crime prevention in
Australia — Issues in policy and research.
Sydney: Federation
Press.
64.
ParksT. (2002). A season with Verona.
London, Secker and Warburg.
65.
Productivity
Commission. (2003). Social capital:
Reviewing the concept and its policy implications.
Productivity Commission Research Paper,
Melbourne.
66.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and
revival of American community. New
York: Simon and
Schuster.
Queensland Government. (2002). A Strategic Framework for
Community Crime Prevention.
Brisbane:
Author.
69.
RoseN. (1996). The death of the social?
Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and
Society, 25(3),
327-56.
70.
SabelC. (2001). A quiet revolution of democratic
governance: Towards democratic experimentalism. In OECD, Governance in the
21st century (pp. 121–148).
Brussels:
OECD.
71.
SampsonR.MorenoffJ.EarlsF. (1999). Beyond social capital:
Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children.
American Sociological Review,
64(5),
633-660.
72.
SampsonR. (2002). Transcending tradition: New
directions in community research, Chicago style.
Criminology, 40(2),
213-230.
73.
ShermanL., et al (2002). Evidence-based crime
prevention. London:
Routledge.
74.
StoneW.HughesJ. (2002). Social capital: Empirical meaning
and measurement validity. Melbourne:
Australian Institute of Family
Studies.
75.
Victorian Labor Party. (2002). A safe and just society. In
Labor's plan for building a stronger and fairer community in
Victoria (Ch.12). Melbourne:
Victorian Labor Party.
76.
WarrenM. (2001). Dry bones rattling: Community
building to revitalize American democracy.
Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
77.
WalklateS. (2002). Gendering crime prevention:
Exploring the tension between policy and Process. In
HughesG. et al. (Eds.), Crime prevention and community
safety. London:
Sage.
78.
WilliamsR. (1977). Marxism and literature.
Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
79.
YoungJ. (1999). The exclusive society.
London:
Sage.
