Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Acrolein is a potent fixative that provides both excellent preservation of ultra-structural morphology and retention of antigenicity, thus it is frequently used for immunocytochemical detection of antigens at the electron microscopic level. However, acrolein is not commonly used for fluorescence microscopy because of concerns about possible autofluorescence and destruction of the luminosity of fluorescent dyes. Here we describe a simple protocol that allows fine visualization of two fluorescent markers in 40-μm sections from acrolein-perfused rat brain. Autofluorescence was removed by pretreatment with 1% sodium borohydride for 30 min, and subsequent incubation in a 50% ethanol solution containing 0.3% hydrogen peroxide enhanced fluorescence labeling. Thus, fluorescence labeling can be used for high-quality detection of markers in tissue perfused with acrolein. Furthermore, adjacent acrolein-fixed sections from a single experiment can be processed to produce high-quality results for electron microscopy or fluorescence labeling.

Keywords

sodium borohydride endogenous peroxidase inactivation autofluorescence ethanol enhanced penetration hydrogen peroxide aldehyde fixation

Acrolein (propenal or acrylic aldehyde) is a three-carbon α-β-unsaturated monoaldehyde that provides outstanding stabilization of proteins, similar to glutaraldehyde, but penetrates tissue more rapidly (Flitney 1966; Saito and Keino 1976), providing excellent morphological preservation of fine structure for electron microscopy (EM) studies (Sabatini et al. 1963). Although fixation of tissue blocks or cultured cells with acrolein can degrade enzymatic activity or anti-genicity (Sabatini et al. 1963; van den Eijnden-van Raaij et al. 1988), acrolein has been frequently used for immunocytochemistry for EM-level studies (King et al. 1983; Pickel et al. 1986a,b,c; Sesack et al. 1998; Pinto et al. 2003; Alvira-Botero and Garzon 2006; Mengual et al. 2008; Pinto and Sesack 2008; Lessard et al. 2009) because degradation is not excessive when fixation times are short (Flitney 1966), such as during transcardial perfusion (King et al. 1983; Leranth and Pickel 1989). Furthermore, the rapid penetration and strong cross-linking abilities of acrolein quickly stabilize proteins, retaining even small peptides that can be successfully immunolabeled (King et al. 1983; Pickel et al. 1986c).

However, highly reactive aldehyde fixatives like glutaraldehyde or acrolein are not often used for fluorescence studies. While there are some reports of fluorescence labeling after glutaraldehyde fixation, to our knowledge, acrolein has been seldom used because of concerns about possible high-background autofluorescence levels, as described for glutaraldehyde (Cande et al. 1977; Weber et al. 1978; Clancy and Cauller 1998) and fluorophore degradation (Herzog and Kummel 2000). Nevertheless, we sought to extract connectional and neurochemical information from valuable tissue samples that had been labeled in vivo with an anterograde tracer and subsequently fixed with acrolein with the original intent of analysis with EM but where the number of labeled axons of interest were too sparse for EM detection.

Several treatments have been used to remove tissue fluorescence caused by other fixatives, mostly glutaraldehyde, but only partial reductions have been achieved (Weber et al. 1978; Beisker et al. 1987; Clancy and Cauller 1998; Haraguchi and Yokota 2002; Ngwenya et al. 2005). For example, a 30% reduction of background autofluorescence was reported for paraformaldehyde-fixed sections after immersion in sodium borohydride (NaBH₄), an aldehydic reducing agent (Abdel-Akher et al. 1952), and somewhat lower in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue (Clancy and Cauller 1998), whereas lower reductions have been achieved with treatments involving glycine, ammonium chloride, or Sudan black B (Ngwenya et al. 2005). In addition, in situ hybridization visualized with fluorescence labeling has been shown to benefit, in some cases, from incubation in an alcohol-containing quenching solution (Barroso-Chinea et al. 2007).

We report here that pretreatment with NaBH₄ and subsequent incubation in 50% ethanol allows successful two-color fluorescence labeling of acrolein-fixed tissue and that the quality of detection is similar to that obtained for EM studies. Thus, fluorescence labeling can be used for high-quality detection of markers in tissue perfused with acrolein. Furthermore, fluorescence techniques and ultrastructural studies can be carried out with adjacent acrolein-fixed sections from the same tissue block.

Materials and Methods

Surgical Procedure and Perfusion of Animals

All experiments were conducted using adult male Wistar rats (250–300 g; Harlan, San Pietro al Natisone, Italy) in accordance with the national and European regulations for animal care (Spanish Royal Decree 223/1988 and European Council Directive 86/609/EEC) and were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of the University of Navarra. Prior to surgery, rats were deeply anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine [(Imalgène 500) 75 mg/kg; Merial, Barcelona, Spain], xylacine [(Rompún 2%) 10 mg/kg; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany), and atropine (0.05 mg/kg; B. Braun Medical, Barcelona, Spain) intraperitoneally and placed in a stereotaxic frame (model 1730; David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA). A local anesthetic [(Xilonibsa) 2% lidocaine; Inibsa, Barcelona, Spain] was also administered in the external acoustic meati and scalp. After the craniotomy, 2% biotinylated dextran amine (BDA-10.000; Molecular Probes Europe, Leiden, The Netherlands) in phosphate buffer (PB), 0.01 M (pH 7.4), was iontophoretically administered in the ventral pallidum through glass micropipettes (inner tip diameter, 30–60 μm), using a 5-μA positive-pulsed direct current (7 sec on/7 sec off) over 10–20 min.

After a survival period of 12–15 days, the animals were deeply anesthetized with 10% chloral hydrate (10 ml/kg, intraperitoneally) and perfused through the aortic arch with (1) 5–10 ml of heparin-saline, (2) 50 ml of 3.75% acrolein (catalog ref. 01680; Fluka, Steinheim, Germany) in 2% paraformaldehyde, and (3) 200 ml of 2% paraformaldehyde. The fixative solutions were prepared in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4). Brains were removed from the cranium, blocked into 2–4-mm coronal slices of tissue and postfixed in a 2% paraformaldehyde solution for 30 min at 4C. Subsequently, brains were immersed in PB and sectioned rostrocaudally at a thickness of 40 μm on a vibratome (VT 1000S; Leica Microsystems, Nussloch, Germany). Sections were serially collected in cryoprotective solution (30% ethylene glycol, 30% glycerol in 0.05 M PB) and stored at 220C.

Sodium Borohydride Pretreatment

In a first set of experiments, we analyzed the effect of pretreatment with sodium borohydride (NaBH₄) on acrolein-fixed tissue. Two serial brainstem sections from five animals that had undergone surgery and subsequent acrolein fixation were selected and rinsed thoroughly in PB at room temperature to remove all cryoprotectant solution. One series of sections was subsequently incubated in a freshly prepared 1% solution of NaBH₄ in PB for 30 min under agitation at room temperature and thoroughly rinsed in PB to eliminate all bubbles, until the sections laid flat at the bottom of the crucible (Leranth and Pickel 1989; Mengual and Pickel 2002). The other series of sections were kept in PB under agitation at room temperature for the equivalent time of treatment and rinses. Finally, both sets of sections were mounted onto subbed slides, air-dried, dehydrated, and defatted in toluene (12 min), and cover-slipped with mounting medium (DPX; VWR International Ltd., Poole, England).

All sections were examined with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 510 META model; Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) using a 40x oil immersion lens with differential interference contrast. Green Alexa 488 fluorescence (Molecular Probes) was excited using a 488-nm argon laser, and emitted fluorescence was detected with a 505–530-nm-band-pass filter. Red Alexa 568 was excited with a 543-nm helium/neon laser, and emission was detected with a 560-nm-band-pass filter. Two images were taken at random from each section; all images were captured with the same acquisition settings so that comparisons could be made between the two groups. The background intensity was measured both in the red and green channels with Zeiss LSM software and was calculated from three areas per section with the formula S (intensity × absolute frequency)/&Sgrave; absolute frequency. Mean values from treated sections were compared to those from non-treated sections, using the Wilcoxon non-parametric test for two dependent samples (SPSS software, version 15.0; Chicago, IL).

Incubation in a Quenching Solution and Two-color Fluorescence Labeling

After sections were pretreated with NaBH₄, a series of sections were rinsed three times in PB and three times in PBS (0.1 M; pH 7.4) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in a 50% ethanol solution containing 0.3% H₂O₂ (Prensa and Parent 2001). Treated and non-treated sections were subsequently rinsed three times in PBS and processed for two-color fluorescence labeling as follows. All incubations were carried out in the dark at room temperature and under agitation, unless otherwise specified. Sections were incubated in streptavidin-Alexa 488 (1:250 dilution; Molecular Probes) in PBS for 2 hr, followed by three washes in PBS and incubation for 40 min in a solution containing 4% normal rabbit serum, 0.05% Triton X-100, and 4% BSA. Subsequently, sections were incubated overnight at 4C in the same solution containing a goat polyclonal antibody against choline acetyltransferase [(ChAT] 1:150 dilution; Chemicon International Inc., Temecula, CA). After sections were washed three times in PBS, they were incubated for 2 hr in a solution containing 0.5% normal rabbit serum, 2% BSA, and Alexa Fluor 568 rabbit anti-goat IgG (1:200 dilution; Invitrogen). After another three washes in PBS, sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides, air dried, dehydrated in toluene, and coverslipped. Slides were examined with a confocal microscope (LSM 510 META; Zeiss).

In a second series of experiments, the contribution of each component of the quenching solution to the fluorescent labeling was analyzed. Thus, four serial brainstem sections from the same five animals used previously were treated with NaBH₄, and after three washes in PB followed by an additional three washes in PBS, the sections were sorted into four groups, each of which was incubated in one of the following solutions: (1) PBS only (negative control); (2) 50% ethanol; (3) 0.3% H₂O₂ in deionized water; and (4) 50% ethanol plus 0.3% H₂O₂. After incubation, all sections were again rinsed three times in PBS and then processed for two-color fluorescence labeling. Once sections were mounted as described above, slides were analyzed with confocal microscopy. One image of the cholinergic mesopontine tegumentum was captured per section, with the same acquisition settings in all cases. Since neurons displayed different degrees of intensity, three to four neurons that showed higher luminosity were selected; their intensities were calculated with the formula S (intensity × absolute frequency)/S absolute frequency, and the mean value for the image was obtained. Likewise, three to four neurons with a lighter labeling were randomly selected and the same calculations were made. Statistical comparisons of the mean values were carried out among the four different groups, using the Friedman non-parametric k-dependent samples test, followed by a Wilcoxon test with Bonferroni's correction (SPSS software, version 15.0).

The neuropil intensity was also measured, both in the red and the green channels. Three to four areas devoid of neurons, consisting of only fiber-containing neuropil, were chosen and delineated in the same images previously acquired from the mesopontine tegmentum, and the intensities were obtained with the same software and formula as described above. Mean values from each section were then calculated, and statistical comparisons were carried out among the four different groups using the Friedman test and followed by the Wilcoxon test with Bonferroni's correction (SPSS software, version 15.0).

The possible effect of the components of the quenching solution after NaBH₄ treatment was also tested with unlabeled tissue. Thus, four serial brainstem sections from the same five rats were selected, treated with NaBH₄ and rinsed, sorted into four groups, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in one of the four solutions mentioned above. After incubation, all sections were rinsed three times in PBS and mounted as described above. Slides were analyzed using a regular epifluorescence microscope (Eclipse E800M model; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Results

To determine whether double-labeling fluorescence techniques could be successfully performed on acrolein-fixed tissue, we first tested the effect of pretreatment with NaBH₄ on both unlabeled and fluorescence-labeled sections. In subsequent experiments, the effect of a quenching solution was analyzed after two-color fluorescence labeling. A summary of the different trials and their results is shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Summary of treatments tested on acrolein-fixed tissue and results

Treatment 1	Treatment 2	Fluorescence labeling	Result
NaBH₄	—	No	NaBH₄ eliminates tissue autofluorescence
PBS	—	No
NaBH₄	EtOH 50% + 0.3% H₂O₂	Intense	Ethanol + H₂O₂ increases fluorescent detection
	PBS	Poor
NaBH₄	PBS	Poor	Ethanolisthe component that accounts for the enhanced detection
	EtOH 50%	Intense
	EtOH 50% + 0.3% H₂O₂	Intense
	H₂O + 0.3% H₂ O₂	Poor

Effect of Pretreatment With NaBH₄ on Tissue Fluorescence After Acrolein Fixation

Qualitative observation of acrolein-fixed sections with a fluorescence microscope revealed a strong tissue fluorescence, consistent with previous reports showing autofluorescence produced by other strong fixatives like glutaraldehyde (Figures 1A and 1C). In contrast NaBH₄-treated sections displayed little or no auto-fluorescence (Figures 1B and 1D). In a quantitative analysis, the mean values of fluorescence intensity in NaBH₄-treated sections were, in all cases, much lower than those in non-treated sections, both in the green and the red channels (Figures 2A and 2B). The statistical comparison between the two groups showed that fluorescence in non-treated sections was significantly higher than in the treated ones (Wilcoxon test, p=0.043 for both channels). These results show that pretreatment with NaBH₄ efficiently reduces tissue fluorescence due to acrolein fixation. However, sporadic cells exhibiting strong autofluorescence were occasionally observed in close relationship to blood vessels (Figures 1A–1D, arrows and arrowheads).

Figure 1

Effect of sodium borohydride pretreatment on unlabeled acrolein-fixed sections. Representative confocal microscopy stacks from pairs of adjacent sections from different animals, obtained with the same scanning settings, are shown. (A, C) show strong tissue fluorescence in non-treated sections. (B, D) NaBH₄-treated sections display no tissue fluorescence. Note that sporadic autofluorescent blood cells adhered to the blood vessel wall are still observed after the treatment (A, B, arrows). Putative endothelial cells also displayed autofluorescence before and after incubation in NaBH₄ (C, D, arrowheads). Bar = 20 μm.

Effect of Incubation in an H₂O₂ Solution on Fluorescence Labeling

Two-color fluorescence labeling was then carried out with another set of sections previously treated with NaBH₄. ChAT-labeled neurons were visible in the red channel and BDA-containing fibers were observed in the green channel. Since immunofluorescence detection of in situ hybridization is enhanced by prior incubation in a quenching solution (Barroso-Chinea et al. 2007), we determined whether the two-color fluorescence labeling would benefit from incubation in a 50% ethanol solution plus H₂O₂. Indeed, qualitative observations showed that incubation in the ethanol/H₂O₂ solution enhanced the fluorescence detection of labeled neurons and fibers (Figures 3A and 3B). In further experiments designed to quantitatively determine the improved detection, and also whether a single component of the incubation solution was causing it, the intensity of both neurons and neuropil was estimated, analyzing intensely labeled and lightly labeled neurons separately. Comparisons of mean values among groups showed statistically significant differences within both populations (Friedman test, p=0.014 and p=0.021, intensely labeled and lightly labeled neurons, respectively). Comparisons between groups revealed no differences, either between PBS and H₂O₂ in water or between ethanol only and ethanol plus H₂O₂ (Wilcoxon test, p=0.345, and p=0.138, intensely labeled neurons, respectively; p=0.50, p=0.56, lightly labeled neurons, respectively), suggesting that H₂O₂ is not the cause of the enhanced detection of neurons. In contrast, a trend toward a statistically significant difference was found between PBS and ethanol plus H₂O₂ and also between ethanol plus H₂O₂ and H₂O₂ in water, in both intensely labeled and lightly labeled neurons (Wilcoxon test, p=0.043, and p=0.043, intensely labeled neurons; p=0.08, and p=0.043, lightly labeled neurons, respectively), indicating that the presence of ethanol is likely to account for the enhanced neuronal labeling.

Figure 2

Graphs show mean intensity values in NaBH₄-treated (gray) vs non-treated (black) unlabeled sections from five animals. Mean intensity values ranged from 0 (black) to 255 (maximum intensity). (A) Values obtained in the green channel. (B) Values obtained in the red channel. R number = rat subject number.

In relation to the neuropil, mean values were also obtained in the green and the red channels. Comparisons of mean values showed no differences among the four groups in the red channel (Friedman test, p=0.266), although a statistically significant difference was observed in the green channel (Friedman test, p=0.006), consistent with the qualitative observation of enhanced detection of green BDA-labeled fibers. Comparisons between groups showed no differences, either between PBS and H₂O₂ in water or between ethanol only and ethanol plus H₂O₂, as previously observed for labeled neurons. In contrast, a trend toward a statistically significant difference was found again in PBS vs ethanol plus H₂O₂ and between ethanol plus H₂O₂ and H₂O₂ in water (Wilcoxon test, p=0.043 and p=0.043, respectively). Thus, ethanol seems to be contributing significantly to the enhanced fiber labeling in the green channel.

Effect of the H₂O₂ Solution on Unlabeled Tissue

As noted above, sporadic autofluorescent cells continued to be present after NaBH₄ treatment, which were in sharp contrast to the dark background. Some cells resembled blood cells and appeared mainly along longitudinally sectioned blood vessels, adhered to remnants of blood vessel wall (Figure 1B, arrows). Other cells had an elongated cell body that lined the blood vessel lumen, suggesting an endothelial cell phenotype (Figure 1D, arrowhead). Subsequent incubation of NaBH₄-treated sections in the quenching solution or each of its components showed no effect of either ethanol or H₂O₂ or both on removal of cell auto-fluorescence (Figure 4). However, blood vessels were scarce within individual sections and only occasionally fell within the area of interest. Moreover, the morphology and location of the autofluorescent cells were obviously distinguishable from the labeled neurons and fibers and did not interfere with them.

Discussion

In the present study we report a simple procedure that allows fine visualization of two fluorescent markers in acrolein-fixed brain tissue. Antigenicity was preserved despite the potency of the fixative; the background fluorescence produced by the fixative was virtually eliminated; and the fluorescent signal was enhanced, providing clear detection of thin fibers and neurons.

Preservation of Antigenicity After Acrolein Fixation

To our knowledge, few studies have used acrolein as a fixative for fluorescence labeling. One of the few studies reported that fixation of cell cultures with 0.1% acrolein for 1 h at room temperature eliminated antigenicity (van den Eijnden-van Raaij et al. 1988). However, much faster acrolein fixation achieved by perfusion preserves antigenicity in brain tissue subsequently analyzed by EM (Leranth and Pickel 1989; Mengual and Pickel 2002). We now report a procedure for obtaining excellent fluorescence labeling with anti-ChAT antibodies after a similarly fast perfusion with acrolein, which differs from the procedure described in a previous report (Leranth and Pickel 1989) for unknown reasons.

Figure 3

Effects of incubation in ethanol plus H₂O₂, ethanol only, or H₂O₂ only, on two-color fluorescence labeling. (A–F) Merged images from confocal microscopy of double-labeled sections from the lateral dorsal tegmental nucleus showing cholinergic neurons in red and BDA-labeled fibers in green. All images were obtained with the same acquisition settings. (A, B) sections from rat R175 without (A) and with (B) incubation in a 50% ethanol plus 0.3% H₂O₂, prior to the two-color fluorescence labeling. (C–F) Four serial sections from rat R194 showing the effect of different incubation solutions: (C) PBS; (D) water plus 0.3% H₂O₂; (E) 50% ethanol only; (F) 50% ethanol 0.3% plus H₂O₂. BDA, biotinylated dextran amine. Bar = 20 μm.

Effect of Sodium Borohydride Pretreatment on Acrolein vs Glutaraldehyde Autofluorescence

Aldehyde fixatives typically give rise to tissue fluorescence (Cande et al. 1977; Weber et al. 1978; Clancy and Cauller 1998), which seems to be due to the formation of conjugated Schiff bases between aldehydes and amino groups of proteins yielding fluorescent compounds (Nascimento and Cilento 1989; Tuma et al. 1991; García Fraile and Teso Vilar 1992; Hoffmann et al. 1993). The use of the aldehyde-reducing agent NaBH₄ in aqueous solution (Abdel-Akher et al. 1952; Schachner et al. 1977) has provided modest reductions in tissue fluorescence produced by glutaraldehyde (Weber et al. 1978; Beisker et al. 1987; Hirsch and Helke 1988; Clancy and Cauller 1998; Haraguchi and Yokota 2002; Ngwenya et al. 2005). In addition, conveniently, NaBH₄ has also been used frequently during sample processing for EM studies after acrolein fixation (Leranth and Pickel 1989; Mengual and Pickel 2002) but has not been previously tested alone as a single treatment for reducing tissue autofluorescence. In the present study, we used the same protocol (Mengual and Pickel 2002, 2004) and found a dramatic reduction in the autofluorescence induced by acrolein fixation, which enabled fine detection of both cholinergic neurons and BDA-containing fibers. The autofluorescence reduction did not require treatment with sodium metaperiodate prior to NaBH₄ treatment, as reported for the single study carried out with brain tissue after acrolein fixation (Hirsch and Helke 1988).

Figure 4

Effect of incubation in ethanol plus H₂O₂, ethanol only, or H₂O₂ only, on autofluorescent cells in NaBH₄-treated acrolein-fixed sections. (A–D) Serial sections showing the same longitudinally sectioned blood vessel, incubated in different solutions: (A) PBS; (B) water plus 0.3% H₂O₂; (C) 50% ethanol only; (D) 50% ethanol 0.3% plus H₂O₂. Blood cells were visible in the four different conditions but were generally associated with remnants of blood vessel wall (A–D, arrows). Autofluorescent endothelial cells were also observed in the four conditions but were scarcer than blood cells (e.g., arrowheads in A and D). (E, F) Images of a single section incubated in ethanol plus H₂O₂, obtained in the green (E) or red (F) channel, showing a putative endothelial autofluorescent cell (arrowheads) that displays a stronger luminosity in the green channel. Bar = 50 μm.

Autofluorescence is removed by NaBH₄ most likely by reduction of Schiff bases formed after reaction of aldehydes with an amino group, which then become non-fluorescent (Beppu et al. 1987); the alternate possibility that NaBH₄ instead reduces alkenes is considered unlikely (Morrison and Boyd 1976). However, why NaBH₄ is much better at eliminating autofluorescence in acrolein-fixed than in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue is not known. One possibility is the 2x faster tissue penetration speed of acrolein (Saito and Keino 1976). The longer time needed by glutaraldehyde to stabilize proteins may promote, or be caused by, formation of additional bonds with its free aldehyde group, creating steric impediments for NaBH₄ penetration; this would require longer exposure time to the reducing agent, thereby altering the compromise between reduction of autofluorescence and quality of the tissue (Clancy and Cauller 1998; Ngwenya et al. 2005). In addition, since we do not know the amount of reducible Schiff base formed from glutaraldehyde in the tissue, the amount of NaBH₄ used could be stoichiometrically insufficient to reduce all susceptible bonds, which would be more abundant in the case of glutaraldehyde (including imine and carbonyl groups). On the other hand, differences in concentrations and volumes of fixative cannot be ruled out. In any case, our observation that acrolein autofluorescence is totally abolished with incubation in 1% NaBH₄ without altering the quality of the tissue, whereas glutaraldehyde autofluorescence is not, even with a longer incubation (Clancy and Cauller 1998; Ngwenya et al. 2005), suggests that acrolein may be a more convenient fixative than glutaraldehyde for fluorescence labeling techniques.

Enhancement of the Fluorescence Signal After Incubation in Ethanol and H₂O₂

We additionally found that sections treated with ethanol prior to fluorescence labeling displayed an enhanced signal in comparison to control sections, in both neuronal bodies and thin fibers. This is consistent with many reports that ethanol and methanol enhance tissue penetration of immunoreagents (Llewellyn-Smith and Minson 1992; Deere et al. 1998; Krutzik and Nolan 2003; Yokouchi et al. 2003; Pearson et al. 2007). Other treatments have also been used to facilitate penetration of immunoglobulins into the tissue, such as preincubation with dimethylsulfoxide (King et al. 1983). The results, however, are not comparable, since only cell bodies, and not fibers, were labeled in the single report that used dimethylsulfoxide on acrolein-fixed tissue (Hirsch and Helke 1988).

Lack of Effect of Ethanol or H₂O₂ on Artifactual Autofluorescent Cells

Scattered autofluorescent cells could occasionally be observed in close relation with blood vessels in non-treated and in NaBH₄-treated sections. This is consistent with a previous study reporting resilient autofluorescence in blood cells, as well as in pial cells, after NaBH₄ treatment in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue (Clancy and Cauller 1998). The present study adds putative endothelial cells to the list of cell types displaying autofluorescence that was not removed with NaBH₄ treatment. Moreover, neither ethanol nor H₂O₂ had any effect on this artifactual fluorescence. Blood cells display autofluorescence that increases after aldehyde fixation (Hoffman and Hansen 1981; Nascimento and Cilento 1989; Stewart and Stewart 2001; Stewart et al. 2007), and endothelial cells are known to contain lipofuscin (Lamar et al. 1980; Monma et al. 1988), a molecule that has a characteristic fluorescence with broad excitation and emission spectra (Mochizuki et al. 1995; Marmorstein et al. 2002). Lipofuscin pigment appears to be the fluorescent end product of a free radical-induced cross-linking of proteins with oxidized lipids (Kikugawa and Beppu 1987). Brain lipofuscin is not eliminated by incubation with either H₂O₂ or NaBH₄ but only by treatment with CuSO₄ (Schnell et al. 1999). In our sample sections, endothelial fluorescence was detected in both the green and the red ranges, although less intensely in the last range, consistent with the emission spectrum of lipofuscin.

In summary, we have developed a simple protocol that allows simultaneous detection of two markers by means of two-color fluorescence labeling in acrolein-fixed brain tissue. A pretreatment with 1% NaBH₄ for 30 min eliminates the background autofluorescence otherwise produced by acrolein, whereas subsequent incubation in 50% ethanol for 30 min greatly enhances the detection of specific fluorescence labeling. This new protocol enables high-quality detection of markers on acrolein-fixed tissue by using fluorescence labeling, hence, broadening the technical approaches that can be used with acrolein-fixed tissue, which to date has been used almost exclusively for EM studies. Furthermore, the two approaches can be performed in parallel, with different, including adjacent, tissue sections from the same experiment.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (MEC, BFU2004-06825), Gobierno de Navarra 2004, and the Unión Temporal de Empresas project CIMA.

The authors thank Pedro Barroso-Guinea for helpful technical comments, Carmen Sanmartín for advice on organic chemistry, and Isabel Pérez-Otaño and John F. Wesseling for critical reading of the manuscript.

References

Abdel-Akher

Hamilton

Montgomery

Smith

(1952) A new procedure for the determination of the fine structure of polysaccharides. J Am Chem Soc, 74:4970–4971.

Alvira-Botero

Garzon

(2006) Cellular and subcellular distributions of delta opioid receptor activation sites in the ventral oral pontine tegumentum of the cat. Brain Res, 1123:101–111.

Barroso-Chinea

Aymerich

Castle

Perez-Manso

Tunon

Erro

Lanciego

(2007) Detection of two different mRNAs in a single section by dual in situ hybridization: a comparison between colorimetric and fluorescent detection. J Neurosci Methods, 162:119–128.

Beisker

Dolbeare

Gray

(1987) An improved immunocytochemical procedure for high-sensitivity detection of incorporated bromodeoxyuridine. Cytometry, 8:235–239.

Beppu

Murakami

Kikugawa

(1987) Detection of oxidized lipid-modified erythrocyte membrane proteins by radiolabeling with tritiated borohydride. Biochim Biophys Acta, 897:169–179.

Cande

Lazarides

McIntosh

(1977) A comparison of the distribution of actin and tubulin in the mammalian mitotic spindle as seen by indirect immunofluorescence. J Cell Biol, 72:552–567.

Clancy

Cauller

(1998) Reduction of background autofluorescence in brain sections following immersion in sodium borohydride. J Neurosci Methods, 83:97–102.

Deere

Vesey

Milner

Williams

Ashbolt

Veal

(1998) Rapid method for fluorescent in situ ribosomal RNA labelling of Cryptosporidium parvum. J Appl Microbiol, 85:807–818.

Flitney

(1966) The time course of the fixation of albumin by formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, acrolein and other higher aldehydes. J R Micros Soc, 85:353.

10.

García Fraile

Teso Vilar

(1992) Análisis Orgánico. Madrid, UNED.

11.

Haraguchi

Yokota

(2002) Immunofluorescence technique for 100-nm-thick semithin sections of Epon-embedded tissues. Histochem Cell Biol, 117:81–85.

12.

Herzog

Kummel

(2000) Fixation of transsynaptically transported WGA-HRP and fluorescent dyes used in combination. J Neurosci Methods, 101:149–156.

13.

Hirsch

Helke

(1988) Bulbospinal thyrotropin-releasing hormone projections to the intermediolateral cell column: a double fluorescence immunohistochemical-retrograde tracing study in the rat. Neuroscience, 25:625–637.

14.

Hoffman

Hansen

(1981) Immunofluorescent analysis of blood cells by flow cytometry. Int J Immunopharmacol, 3:249–254.

15.

Hoffmann

Meyer

Sorrell

Tuma

(1993) Reaction of acetaldehyde with proteins: formation of stable fluorescent ad-ducts. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 17:69–74.

16.

Kikugawa

Beppu

(1987) Involvement of lipid oxidation products in the formation of fluorescent and cross-linked proteins. Chem Phys Lipids, 44:277–296.

17.

King

Lechan

Kugel

Anthony

(1983) Acrolein: a fixative for immunocytochemical localization of peptides in the central nervous system. J Histochem Cytochem, 31:62–68.

18.

Krutzik

Nolan

(2003) Intracellular phospho-protein staining techniques for flow cytometry: monitoring single cell signaling events. Cytometry A, 55:61–70.

19.

Lamar

McKinley

Hinsman

(1980) The fine structure of lipofuscin in the mouse hippocampus. Anat Anz, 147:215–219.

20.

Leranth

Pickel

(1989) Electron microscopic pre-embedding double immunohistochemical methods. In Heimer

Zaborszky

, eds. Neuroanatomical Tract Tracing Methods 2. Recent Progress. New York, Plenum, 129–172.

21.

Lessard

Savard

Gobeil

Jr Pierce

Pickel

(2009) The neurokinin-3 (NK3) and the neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptors are differentially targeted to mesocortical and mesolimbic projection neurons and to neuronal nuclei in the rat ventral tegumental area. Synapse, 63:484–501.

22.

Llewellyn-Smith

Minson

(1992) Complete penetration of antibodies into vibratome sections after glutaraldehyde fixation and ethanol treatment: light and electron microscopy for neuro-peptides. J Histochem Cytochem, 40:1741–1749.

23.

Marmorstein

Sakaguchi

Hollyfield

(2002) Spectral profiling of autofluorescence associated with lipofuscin, Bruch's membrane, and sub-RPE depositsinnormal and AMD eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 43:2435–2441.

24.

Mengual

Chan

Lane

San Luciano Palenzuela

Hara

Lessard

Pickel

(2008) Neurokinin-1 receptors in cholinergic neurons of the rat ventral pallidum have a predominantly dendritic distribution that is affected by apomorphine when combined with startle-evoking auditory stimulation. Neuroscience, 151:711–724.

25.

Mengual

Pickel

(2002) Ultrastructural immunocytochemical localization of the dopamine D2 receptor and tyrosine hydroxylase in the rat ventral pallidum. Synapse, 43:151–162.

26.

Mengual

Pickel

(2004) Regional and subcellular compartmentation of the dopamine transporter and tyrosine hydroxylase in the rat ventral pallidum. J Comp Neurol, 468:395–409.

27.

Mochizuki

Park

Mori

Kawashima

(1995) The difference in autofluorescence features of lipofuscin between brain and adrenal. Zoolog Sci, 12:283–288.

28.

Monma

Satodate

Suzuki

Ujiie

(1988) Ceroid-lipofuscinosis. Report of two autopsy cases. Acta Pathol Jpn, 38:1191–1203.

29.

Morrison

Boyd

(1976) Química Orgánica. Boston, Fondo Educativo Interamericano.

30.

Nascimento

Cilento

(1989) Schiff base formation with amino acids enhances light emission and damage induced in neutrophils by phenylacetaldehyde. Biochim Biophys Acta, 991:50–55.

31.

Ngwenya

Peters

Rosene

(2005) Light and electron microscopic immunohistochemical detection of bromodeoxyuridine-labeled cells in the brain: different fixation and processing protocols. J Histochem Cytochem, 53:821–832.

32.

Pearson

Gatti

Sahibzada

Massari

Gillis

(2007) Ultrastructural evidence for selective noradrenergic innervation of CNS vagal projections to the fundus of the rat. Auton Neurosci, 136:31–42.

33.

Pickel

Chan

Ganten

(1986a) Dual peroxidase and colloidal gold-labeling study of angiotensin converting enzyme and angiotensin-like immunoreactivity in the rat subfornical organ. J Neurosci, 6:2457–2469.

34.

Pickel

Chan

Milner

(1986b) Autoradiographic detection of [125I]-secondary antiserum: a sensitive light and electron microscopic labeling method compatible with peroxidase immunocytochemistry for dual localization of neuronal antigens. J Histochem Cytochem, 34:707–718.

35.

Pickel

Chan

Park

Joh

Milner

(1986c) Ultra-structural localization of phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase in sensory and motor nuclei of the vagus nerve. J Neurosci Res, 15:439–455.

36.

Pinto

Jankowski

Sesack

(2003) Projections from the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus to the rat prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens shell: ultrastructural characteristics and spatial relationships with dopamine afferents. J Comp Neurol, 459:142–155.

37.

Pinto

Sesack

(2008) Ultrastructural analysis of prefrontal cortical inputs to the rat amygdala: spatial relationships to presumed dopamine axons and D1 and D2 receptors. Brain Struct Funct, 213:159–175.

38.

Prensa

Parent

(2001) The nigrostriatal pathway in the rat: a single-axon study of the relationship between dorsal and ventral tier nigral neurons and the striosome/matrix striatal compartments. J Neurosci, 21:7247–7260.

39.

Sabatini

Bensch

Barrnett

(1963) Cytochemistry and electron microscopy. The preservation of cellular ultrastructure and enzymatic activity by aldehyde fixation. J Cell Biol, 17: 19–58.

40.

Saito

Keino

(1976) Acrolein as a fixative for enzyme cytochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem, 24:1258–1269.

41.

Schachner

Hedley-Whyte

Hsu

Schoonmaker

Bignami

(1977) Ultrastructural localization of glial fibrillary acidic protein in mouse cerebellum by immunoperoxidase labeling. J Cell Biol, 75:67–73.

42.

Schnell

Staines

Wessendorf

(1999) Reduction of lipofuscin-like autofluorescence in fluorescently labeled tissue. J Histochem Cytochem, 47:719–730.

43.

Sesack

Hawrylak

Matus

Guido

Levey

(1998) Dopamine axon varicosities in the prelimbic division of the rat prefrontal cortex exhibit sparse immunoreactivity for the dopa-mine transporter. J Neurosci, 18:2697–2708.

44.

Stewart

(2001) Cell preparation for the identification of leukocytes. Methods Cell Biol, 63:217–251.

45.

Stewart

Villasmil

Frampton

(2007) Changes in fluorescence intensity of selected leukocyte surface markers following fixation. Cytometry A, 71:379–385.

46.

Tuma

Hoffman

Sorrell

(1991) The chemistry of acetaldehyde-protein adducts. Alcohol Alcohol Suppl, 1:271–276.

47.

van den Eijnden-van Raaij

van Maurik

Boonstra

van Zoelen

de Laat

(1988) Ultrastructural localization of platelet-derived growth factor and related factors in normal and transformed cells. Exp Cell Res, 178:479–492.

48.

Weber

Rathke

Osborn

(1978) Cytoplasmic microtubular images in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue culture cells by electron microscopy and by immunofluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 75:1820–1824.

49.

Yokouchi

Takeyama

Miyashita

Maruyama

Matsunaga

(2003) In situ identification of symbiotic dinoflagellates, the genus Symbiodinium with fluorescence-labeled rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. J Microbiol Methods, 53:327–334.

Two-color Fluorescence Labeling in Acrolein-fixed Brain Tissue

Abstract

Keywords

Materials and Methods

Surgical Procedure and Perfusion of Animals

Sodium Borohydride Pretreatment

Incubation in a Quenching Solution and Two-color Fluorescence Labeling

Results

Effect of Pretreatment With NaBH4 on Tissue Fluorescence After Acrolein Fixation

Effect of Incubation in an H2O2 Solution on Fluorescence Labeling

Effect of the H2O2 Solution on Unlabeled Tissue

Discussion

Preservation of Antigenicity After Acrolein Fixation

Effect of Sodium Borohydride Pretreatment on Acrolein vs Glutaraldehyde Autofluorescence

Enhancement of the Fluorescence Signal After Incubation in Ethanol and H2O2

Lack of Effect of Ethanol or H2O2 on Artifactual Autofluorescent Cells

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

References

Effect of Pretreatment With NaBH₄ on Tissue Fluorescence After Acrolein Fixation

Effect of Incubation in an H₂O₂ Solution on Fluorescence Labeling

Effect of the H₂O₂ Solution on Unlabeled Tissue

Enhancement of the Fluorescence Signal After Incubation in Ethanol and H₂O₂

Lack of Effect of Ethanol or H₂O₂ on Artifactual Autofluorescent Cells