Differentiation of Hypocaust and Floor Tiles at Coriglia,Castel Viscardo (Umbria,Italy) Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Portable X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrometry
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2012
Differentiation of Hypocaust and Floor Tiles at Coriglia,Castel Viscardo (Umbria,Italy) Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Portable X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrometry
Portable X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry was used to collect elemental data for in situ hypocaust tiles and floors at an archaeological excavation site near Orvieto, Italy. Data obtained from 2009 to 2011 using three different XRF instruments are compared. Both quantitative results and spectral data were utilized for graphical and chemometric evaluation of the samples' elemental compositions. Despite the different instrumental conditions, changes in data collection protocols, and various data evaluation procedures used with each instrument, conclusions about the archaeological relationships among the tiles remained the same across the three-year study. Utilization of fused data did provide some improvements in differentiation of the materials but at the cost of significantly increased analysis times. The robustness of portable XRF instruments for differentiation of in situ archaeological samples is clearly demonstrated.
AlvarezJ.I.NavarroI.Garcia CasadoP.J.“Thermal, mineralogical and chemical studies of the mortars used in the cathedral of Pamplona (Spain)”. Thermochim. Acta.2000. 365(1-2): 177–187.
2.
BenedettiD.ValettiS.BontempiE.PiccioliC.DeperoL.E.“Study of ancient mortars from the Roman Villa of Pollio Felice in Sorrento (Naples)”. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process.2004. 79(2): 341–345.
3.
Maravelaki-KalaitzakiP.BakolasA.MoropoulouA.“Physico-chemical study of Cretan ancient mortars”. Cem. Concr. Res.2003. 33(5): 651–661.
4.
MertensG.ElsenJ.BruletR.BrutsaertA.DeckersM.“Quantitative composition of ancient mortars from the Notre Dame Cathedral in Tournai (Belgium)”. Mater. Charact.2009. 60(7): 580–585.
5.
MontoyaC.LanasJ.ArandigoyenM.CasadoP.J.G.AlvarezJ.I.“Mineralogical, chemical and thermal characterisations of ancient mortars of the church of Santa Maria de Irache Monastery (Navarra, Spain)”. Mater. Struct. (Bagneux, Fr.).2004. 37(270): 433–439.
6.
SandroliniF.FranzoniE.“Characterization procedure for ancient mortars' restoration: The plasters of the Cavallerizza courtyard in the Ducal Palace in Mantua (Italy)”. Mater. Charact.2010. 61(1): 97–104.
7.
SilvaD.A.WenkH.R.MonteiroP.J.M.“Comparative investigation of mortars from Roman Colosseum and cistern”. Thermochim. Acta.2005. 438(1-2): 35–40.
8.
BrunoP.CalabreseD.Di PierroM.GengaA.LaganaraC.ManigrassiD.A.P.TrainiA.UbbrìacoP.“Chemical-physical and mineralogical investigation on ancient mortars from the archaeological site of Monte Sannace (Bari–Southern Italy)”. Thermochim. Acta.2004. 418(1-2): 131–141.
9.
ElsenJ.BrutsaertA.DeckersM.BruletR.“Microscopical study of ancient mortars from Tournai (Belgium)”. Mater. Charact.2004. 53(2-4): 289–294.
10.
GenestarC.PonsC.MasA.“Analytical characterization of ancient mortars from the archaeological Roman city of Pollentia (Balearic Islands, Spain)”. Anal. Chim. Acta.2006. 557(1-2): 373–379.
11.
GottiE.OlesonJ.P.BottalicoL.BrandonC.CucitoreR.HohlfelderR.L.“A comparison of the chemical and engineering characteristics of ancient Roman hydraulic concrete with a modern reproduction of vitruvian hydraulic concrete”. Archaeometry.2008. 50(4): 576–590.
12.
CardianoP.SergiS.StefanoC.IoppoloS.PirainoP.“Investigations of ancient mortars from the Basilian Monastery of Fragala”. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.2008. 91(2): 477–485.
13.
SanchezJ.S.RomaniJ.R.V.MosqueraD.F.AlvesC.A.“Study of origin and composition of coatings in a monument built with granitic rocks, by SEM, XRD, XRF and DTA-TGA”. X-Ray Spectrom.2008. 37(4): 346–354.
14.
LorussoS.FioriC.TucciA.RastelliE.PinnaD.“Study on the conservation of the Medicean Walls of Terra del Sole (Forli, Italy)”. Ceramurgia and Ceramica Acta.2004. 34(5/6): 207–215.
15.
FranziniM.LeoniL.LezzeriniM.SartoriF.“On the binder of some ancient mortars”. Mineral. Petrol.1999. 67(1-2): 59–69.
16.
AngeliniE.GrassiniS.CorbelliniS.IngoG.M.de CaroT.PlesciaP.RiccucciC.BiancoA.AgostiniS.“Potentialities of XRF and EIS portable instruments for the characterization of ancient artefacts”. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process.2006. 83(4): 643–649.
17.
AbeY.NakaiI.TakahashiK.KawaiN.YoshimuraS.“On-site analysis of archaeological artifacts excavated from the on the outcrop at Northwest Saqqara, Egypt, by using a newly developed portable fluorescence spectrometer and diffractometer”. J. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.2009. 395: 1987–1996.
18.
UdaM.IshizakiA.SatohR.OkadaK.NakajimaY.YamashitaD.OhashiK.SakurabaY.ShimonoA.KojimaD.“Portable X-ray diffractometer equipped with XRF for archaeometry”. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B.2005. 239(1-2): 77–84.
19.
DonaisM.K.GeorgeD.DuncanB.WojtasS.DaigleA.“Evaluation of Data Processing and Analysis Approaches for Fresco Pigments by Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry and Portable Raman Spectroscopy”. Anal. Methods.2011. 3(5): 1061–1071.
20.
BruniS.GuglielmiV.“Applications of a compact portable Raman spectrometer for the field analysis of pigments in works of art”. Springer Proc. Phys.2007. 116(Lasers in the Conservation of Artworks): 407–414.
21.
de WaalD.“Micro-Raman and portable Raman spectroscopic investigation of blue pigments in selected Delft plates (17-20th Century”. J. Raman Spectrosc.2009. 40(12): 2162–2170.
22.
PaternosterG.RinzivilloR.NunziataF.CastellucciE.M.LofrumentoC.ZoppiA.FeliciA.C.FronterottaG.NicolaisC.PiacentiniM.SciutiS.VendittelliM.“Study on the technique of the Roman age mural paintings by micro-XRF with Polycapillary Conic Collimator and micro-Raman analyses”. J. of Cult. Herit.2005. 6(1): 21–28.
23.
VandenabeeleP.TateJ.MoensL.“Non-destructive analysis of museum objects by fibre-optic Raman spectroscopy”. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.2007. 387: 813–819.
24.
DeneckereA.SchudelW.Van BosM.WoutersH.BergmansA.VandenabeeleP.MoensL.“In situ investigations of vault paintings in the Antwerp cathedral”. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A.2010. 75: 511–519.
25.
PapadopoulouD.N.ZachariadisG.A.AnthemidisA.N.TsirliganisN.C.StratisJ.A.“Development and optimisation of a portable micro-XRF method for in situ multi-element analysis of ancient ceramics”. Talanta.2006. 68(5): 1692–1699.
26.
CecilL.G.MoriartyM.D.SpeakmanR.J.GlascockM.D.“Feasibility of field-portable XRF to identify obsidian sources in Central Peten, Guatemala”. ACS Symp. Ser.2007. 968(Archaeological Chemistry): 506–521.
27.
DesnicaV.SchreinerM.“A LabVIEW-controlled portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer for the analysis of art objects”. X-Ray Spectrom.2006. 35(5): 280–286.
28.
DesnicaV.SkaricK.Jembrih-SimbuergerD.FazinicS.JaksicM.MudronjaD.PavlicicM.PeranicI.SchreinerM.“Portable XRF as a valuable device for preliminary in situ pigment investigation of wooden inventory in the Trski Vrh church in Croatia”. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process.2008. 92(1): 19–23.
29.
DonaisM.K.DuncanB.GeorgeD.BizzarriC.“Comparisons of Ancient Mortars and Hydraulic Cements through In-Situ Analyses by Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry”. X-Ray Spectrom.2010. 39: 146–153.
30.
GianoncelliA.KourousiasG.“Limitations of portable XRF implementations in evaluating depth information: An archaeometric perspective”. Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process.2007. 89(4): 857–863.
31.
HayakawaY.“Portable XRF analysis of japanese historical objects”. Adv. X-Ray Anal.2004. 47: 36–41.
32.
KarydasA.G.“Application of a portable XRF spectrometer for the non-invasive analysis of museum metal artefacts”. Ann. Chim. (Rome, Italy).2007. 97(7): 419–432.
33.
KarydasA.G.KotzamaniD.BernardR.BarrandonJ.N.ZarkadasC.“A compositional study of a museum jewelery collection (7th-1st BC) by means of a portable XRF spectrometer”. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B.2004. 226(1-2): 15–28.
34.
NazaroffA.J.PruferK.M.DrakeB.L.“Assessing the applicability of portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for obsidian provenance research in the Maya lowlands”. J. Archaeol. Sci.2010. 37(4): 885–895.
35.
PottsP.J.BernardiniF.JonesM.C.Williams-ThorpeO.WebbP.C.“Effects of weathering on in situ portable X-ray fluorescence analyses of geological outcrops: Dolerite and rhyolite outcrops from the Preseli Mountains, South Wales”. X-Ray Spectrom.2006. 35(1): 8–18.
36.
RomanoF.P.PappalardoG.PappalardoL.GarraffoS.GigliR.PautassoA.“Quantitative non-destructive determination of trace elements in archaeological pottery using a portable beam stability-controlled XRF spectrometer”. X-Ray Spectrom.2006. 35(1): 1–7.
37.
UhlirK.GriesserM.BuzanichG.WobrauschekP.StreliC.WegrzynekD.MarkowiczA.Chinea-CanoE.“Applications of a new portable (micro) XRF instrument having low-Z elements determination capability in the field of works of art”. X-Ray Spectrom.2008. 37(4): 450–457.
38.
DonaisM.K.LebelC.ThibodeauK.“Investigations of metals in drainage system deposit material and lead pipe in Castel Viscardo”. Paper presented at: Conference of the Federation of Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy Societies. Reno, Nevada; Sept 29. 2008.
DonaisM.K.GeorgeD.“Using Portable XRF to Aid in Phasing, Locus Comparisons, and Material Homogeneity Assessment at an Archaeological Excavation”. In: ShugarA.MaasJ., editors. Handheld XRF for Art and Archaeology. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2012. (In press.)
41.
MantlerM.WillisJ.LachanceG.VrebosB.MauserK.-E.KawaharaR.RousseauR.BrouwerP.“Quantitative Analysis”. In: BeckhoffB.KanngieβerB.LanghoffN.WedellR.WolffH., editors. Handbook of Practical X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer, 2006. Quantitative Analysis, Pp. 309–410.
