Characteristics of a Rubidium Metal Vapor Filter for Laser Scatter Rejection in Single Molecule Detection

Abstract

The characteristics of a rubidium metal vapor filter (MVF) for its use as a laser scatter filter for single molecule detection (SMD) were investigated. This investigation was done by a simulation along with experimental observation. A monochromator was used to elucidate the spectral components of the background in SMD. The major contributors to the background were laser transmission and fluorescence of the rubidium vapor. Experiments on the filter's performance under varying conditions such as MVF temperature, MVF pressure, and laser power were done. It was found that the integrated transmission intensity decreased with increasing pressure and temperature while it increased for increasing laser powers. The computer simulation modeled the experimentally observed profiles very well. Through the simulation, it was determined that the limitation on the attenuation by the MVF was due to the transmission of the broad-band stimulated emission “wings” of the Ti:sapphire laser.

Keywords

Single molecule detection Metal vapor filters Laser-induced fluorescence Spectral simulation Near-infrared

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Indralingam

Simeonsson

J. B.

Petrucci

G. A.

Smith

B. W.

and Winefordner

J. D

, Anal. Chem. 64, 964 (1992).

Woodward

L. A.

, in Raman Spectroscopy: Theory and Practice, Vol. 2, Szymanski

H. A.

, Ed. (Plenum Press, New York, 1970).

Long

D. A.

, Raman Spectroscopy (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977).

Peck

Stryer

Glazer

A. N.

and Mathies

, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 4087 (1989).

Lee

Y. H.

, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville (1994).

Dovichi

N. J.

Martin

J. C.

Jett

J. H.

Trkula

and Keller

R. A

, Anal. Chem. 56, 348 (1984).

Shera

E. B.

Seitzinger

N. K.

Davis

L. M.

Keller

R. A.

and Soper

S. A

, Chem. Phys. Lett. 174, 553 (1990).

Whitten

W. B.

Ramsey

J. M.

Arnold

and Bronk

B. V

, Anal. Chem. 63, 1027 (1991).

Soper

S. A.

Mattingly

Q. L.

and Vegunta

, Anal. Chem. 65, 740 (1993).

10.

Eigen

and Rigler

, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5740 (1994).

11.

Puppels

G. J.

Huzinga

Krabbe

H. W.

de Boer

H. A.

Gijsbers

and de Mul

F. F. M

, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 3709 (1990).

12.

Rasetti

, Nuovo Cimento 7, 261 (1930).

13.

Pelletier

M. J.

, Appl. Spectrosc. 46, 395 (1992).

14.

Pelletier

M. J.

, Appl. Spectrosc. 47, 69 (1993).

15.

Horosyski

P. J.

and Thewalt

M. L

, Appl. Spectrosc. 48, 843 (1994).

16.

Lee

Y. H.

Maus

Smith

B. W.

and Winefordner

J. D

, Anal. Chem. 66, 4142 (1994).

17.

Sabbaghzadeh

and Fink

, J. Raman. Spectrosc., paper in press.

18.

Raymond

T. D.

and Smith

A. V

, Opt. Lett. 16, 33 (1991).

19.

Mathies

R. A.

and Peck

, Anal. Chem. 62, 1786 (1990).

20.

Puerta

and Martin

, Appl. Opt. 20, 259 (1981).

21.

Puerta

and Martin

, Appl. Opt. 20, 3923 (1981).

22.

Omenetto

Winefordner

J. D.

and Alkemade

, Spectrochim. Acta 30B, 335(1975).

23.

Gallager

and Lewis

E. L

, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63, 864 (1973).

24.

Beacham

J. R.

and Andrew

K. L

, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 231 (1971).

25.

Hooymayers

H. P.

, Spectrochim. Acta 23B, 567 (1968).

26.

Alkemade

C. Th. J.

Hollander

Tj.

Snelleman

and Zeegers

P. J. Th

, Metal Vapors in Flames (Pergamon Press, Elmsford, New York, 1982).