Comparison of Different Excitation Sources and Normalization Techniques in Laser-Ablation AES Using a Photodiode-Based Spectrometer

Abstract

A new technique is evaluated for normalizing laser power fluctuations in laser-ablation atomic spectrometry. The technique involves measuring the light loss caused by scattering from the ablated material as it flows through a specially designed cell. The resulting measured optical density can be used to correct for variations in the amount of sample that has been ablated. This new approach is compared to the use of a matrix element as an internal standard. Three different excitation sources for AES (Ar-ICP, Ar-MIP, and He-MIP) were combined with laser ablation and evaluated with the new normalization approach. Although the overall performance is best for the Ar-ICP combination, the MIPs have some desirable characteristics (i.e., low background radiation) which in some cases lead to better results. The spectra were collected with a photodiode-based spectrometer that is designed for simultaneous multichannel detection and is therefore especially well suited to measurement and background correction of signals produced during transient sampling such as with laser ablation. The ability of such a spectrometer to deal with complex samples such as cast iron is discussed.

Keywords

Laser ablation AES Multielement analysis ICP MIP Photodiode array

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dittrich

and Wennrich

, Prog. Anal. Atom. Spectrosc. 7, 139 (1984).

Thompson

Goulter

J. E.

and Sieper

, Analyst 106, 32 (1981).

Ishizuka

and Uwamino

, Spectrochim. Acta 38B, 519 (1983).

Carr

J. W.

and Horlick

, Spectrochim. Acta 37B, 1 (1982).

Dittrich

Niebergall

and Wennrich

, Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem. 328, 330 (1987).

Thompson

Chenery

and Brett

, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrosc. 4, 11 (1989).

Tremblay

M. E.

Smith

B. W.

Leong

M. B.

and Winefordner

J. D

, Spectrosc. Lett 20, 311 (1987).

and Lin

, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrosc. 3, 841 (1988).

Mitchell

P. G.

Sneddon

and Radziemski

L. J

, Appl. Spectrosc. 41, 141 (1987).

10.

Leis

and Laqua

, Spectrochim. Acta 33B, 727 (1978).

11.

Ishizuka

and Uwamino

, Anal. Chem. 52, 125 (1980).

12.

Gray

A. L.

, Analyst 110, 551 (1985).

13.

Arrowsmith

, Anal. Chem. 59, 1437 (1987).

14.

Hieftje

G. M.

, “Critical Comparison of Sources and Detection Methods in Atomic Spectrometry,” Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem. (in press, 1990).

15.

Chen

and Yeung

E. S

, Anal. Chem. 60, 2258 (1988).

16.

Hager

J. W.

, Anal. Chem. 61, 1243 (1989).

17.

Arrowsmith

and Hughes

S. K

, Appl. Spectrosc. 42, 123 (1988).

18.

Karanassios

and Horlick

, Appl. Spectrosc. 40, 813 (1986).

19.

Levy

G. M.

Quaglia

Lazure

R. E.

and McGeorge

S. W

, Spectrochim. Acta 42B, 341 (1987).

20.

McGeorge

S. W.

, Spectroscopy 2(4), 106 (1987).

21.

Brushwyler

K. R.

Furuta

and Hieftje

G. M

, “Use of a Spectrally Segmented Photodiode-Array Spectrometer for Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Examination of Procedures for the Evaluation of Dectection Limits,” Talanta (in press, 1990).

22.

Haas

D. L.

Carnahan

J. W.

and Caruso

J. A

, Appl. Spectrosc. 37, 82 (1983).

23.

Bollo-Kamara

and Codding

E. G

, Spectrochim. Acta 36B, 973 (1981).

24.

Michlewicz

K. G.

and Carnahan

J. W

, Anal. Chem. 58, 3122 (1986).

25.

Boumans

P. W. J. M.

, Line Coincidence Tables for Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1984), 2nd ed.

26.

Brownlee

K. A.

, Statistical Theory and Methodology in Science and Engineering (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1965) 2nd ed., p. 334.