We present a laser photoacoustic system which is able to detect a minimum absorption coefficient of 7.1 × 10−10 cm−1 corresponding to a concentration of 20 parts per trillion of C2H4 in air. Improvements made to achieve this sensitivity are reported, and this low limit is applied to the detection of the C2H4 emission of a single orchid flower after emasculation. In addition, the absorption coefficients and detection limits of the following agriculturally interesting gases are measured: ozone, hydrogen sulphide, 1,2 dibromoethane, and ethylacetate.
BrewerR. J.BruceC. W. and MaterJ. L, Appl. Opt.21, 4092 (1982).
2.
BrewerR. J. and BruceC. W, Appl. Opt.17, 3746 (1978).
3.
HubertM. H., “Laser Optoacoustic Measurement of Signatures of a Selection of Environmental Contaminants,” Report for Ultra Lasertechnology, Inc. (Ultra Lasertechnology Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada).
4.
LoperG. L.SasakiG. R. and StampsM. A, Appl. Opt.21, 1648 (1982).
5.
PattyR. R.RusswurmG. M.McClennyW. A. and MorganD. R, Appl. Opt.13, 2850 (1974).
6.
GreenB. D. and SteinfeldJ. I, Appl. Opt.15, 1688 (1976).
7.
MeyerP. L.SuterB. and SigristM. W, Helv. Phys. Acta59, 1027 (1986).
8.
StrumiaF. and IoliN, “High Power, Tunable Waveguide CO2 Lasers,” in Physics of New Laser Sources, AbrahamN. B., Ed. (Plenum Press, New York, 1985), pp. 189–199.
9.
DegnanJ. J., Appl. Phys.11, 1 (1976).
10.
AbramsR. L. and BridgesW. B, IEEE J. of Quantum Electr.9, 940 (1973).
11.
HeijmenB.LiedenbaumC.StolteS. and ReussJ, Z. Phys. D6, 199 (1987).
12.
MorseP. M. and IngardK. U, Theoretical Acoustics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968), Chap. 6.
13.
KritchmanE.ShtrikmanS. and SlatkineM, J. Opt. Soc. Am.68, 1257 (1978).
14.
NordhausO. and PelzlJ, Appl. Phys.25, 221 (1981).
15.
BenadeA. H., J. Acoust. Soc. Am.44, 616 (1968).
16.
BerneggerS. and SigristM. W, Appl. Phys. B44, 125 (1987).
17.
GerlachR. and AmerN. M, Appl. Phys.23, 319 (1980).
18.
KochK. P. and LohmannW, Appl. Phys. Lett.32, 289 (1978).
19.
LambeauC.FaytA.DuncanJ. L. and NakagawaT, J. Mol. Spectrosc.81, 227 (1980).
20.
PerlmutterP.ShtrikmanS. and SlatkineM, Appl. Opt.18, 2267 (1979).
21.
DevirA. D. and OppenheimU. P, Appl. Opt.8, 2121 (1969).
22.
JohnsonR. H.GerlachR.ThomasL. J.III and AmerN. M., Appl. Opt.21, 81 (1982).
23.
YuanR. C. L.PresesJ. M.FlynnG. W. and RonnA. M, J. Chem. Phys.59, 6128 (1973).
24.
CannemeyerF. and de VriesA. E, Physica74, 196 (1974).
25.
RoothR. A.VerhageA. J. L.WoutersL. W. and v.d. BeldL, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Infrared Physics, Zürich (1988), pp. 593–595.
YangS. F. and HoffmanN. E, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.35, 155 (1984).
28.
GohC. J.HalevyA. H.EngelR. and KofranekA. M, Scienta Horticulturae26, 57 (1985).
29.
WolteringE. J. and HarrenF, J. of Exp. Botany40, 907 (1989).
30.
BellJ. N. B., “Air Pollution Problems in Western Europe,” in Effects of Air Pollutants on Plants, MansfieldT. A., Ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976).
31.
LeathR. L., “Ozone,” in Response of Plants to Air Pollution, MuddJ. B. and KuzkowskiT. T, Eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1975).
32.
PattyR. R.RusswurmG. M.McClennyW. A. and MorganD. R, Appl. Opt.13, 2850 (1974).
33.
MaasF. M.de KokJ. and KuyperP. J. C, J. of Plant Physiol.119, 219 (1985).
34.
LaneW.EdwardsT.GillisJ.BonomoF. and MurcrayF, J. of Mol. Spectrosc.95, 365 (1982).
35.
GentiloniS., Scienza e Dossier4, 22 (1986).
36.
NeuJ. T. and GwinnW. D, J. Chem. Phys.18, 1642 (1950).
37.
LeeM. L.SmithD. L. and FreemanL. R, Appl. and Environment. Microbiol.37, 85 (1979).
38.
StanleyG.ShawK. J. and EganA. F, Appl. and Environment. Microbiol.41, 816 (1981).
39.
MillerA.IIIScanlanR. A.LeeJ. S. and LibbeyL. M, Appl. Microbiology25, 952 (1973).
40.
DaintyR. H.EdwardsR. H. and HibbardC. M, J. Appl. Bacteriology57, 75 (1984).