Optoacoustic measurements of NO2 excited by an Ar+ laser were performed in the presence of NO, N2, H2O, and O2 matrix gases. Identical sensitivities were measured in all matrix gases except O2 where energy transfer from NO2 to the metastable O2(1Δg) state resulted in a dramatic decrease in sensitivity.
KreuzerL. B.KenyonN. D., and PatelC. K. N., Science177, 347 (1972).
2.
HarshbargerW. R. and RobinM. B., Accounts Chem. Res.6, 329 (1973).
3.
AngusA. M.MarineroE. E., and CollesM. J., Opt. Commun.14, 223 (1975).
4.
ClaspyP. C.HaC., and PaoY. H., Appl. Opt.16, 2972 (1977).
5.
TerbuneR. W. and AndersonJ. E., Opt. Lett.1, 70 (1977).
6.
FriedA. and StedmanD. H., “Laser Optoacoustic Detection of NO2 in a Flow System” presented at the Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy, Cleveland, OH, March 1979.
7.
FriedA. and HodgesonJ., J. Anal. Chem.54, 278 (1982).
8.
GriggsM., J. Chem. Phys.49, 857 (1968).
9.
InnE. C. Y. and TanakaY., J. Opt. Soc. Am.43, 870 (1953).
10.
SakuraK. and BroidaH. P., J. Chem. Phys.50, 2404 (1969).
11.
MyersG. H.SilverD. M., and KaufmanF., J. Chem. Phys.44, 718 (1966).
12.
HampsonR. F., “Chemical Kinetic and Photochemical Data Sheets for Atmospheric Reactions,” Department of Transportation Report No. FAA-EE-80-17, April 1980.
13.
FrankiewiczT. C. and BerryR. S., J. Chem. Phys.58, 1787 (1973).
14.
HarshbargerW. R. and RobinM. B., Chem. Phys. Lett.21, 462 (1973).
15.
JonesI. T. N. and BayesK. D., J. Chem. Phys.59, 3119 (1973).
16.
HaaksD., “Quenching of NO2(2B1) and (2B2)”, in Laser-Induced Processes in Molecules, KompaK. L. and SmithS. D., eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979), p 352.
