Influences of Composition on Electroless Deposition of Silver Nanoparticles on Glass Substrates for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Measurements

Abstract

A silver-mirror reaction was used to prepare active substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Glass plates were surface treated with a thin layer of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs). The factors influencing the performance of the SERS substrates were systematically studied. Factors included concentrations, species of complexing agents, and reducing agents. p-Nitrothiophenol (pNTP) was used to test the surfaces with Ag-NPs, with the observed signals used to compare the performance resulting from different reducing and complexing agents. The morphologies of the Ag-NPs formed by different reaction conditions were also examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and correlated with the SERS signals. Reducing agents included formaldehyde, sodium tartrate, and several carbohydrates. The results indicate that the use of glucose as a reducing agent produced the most suitable Ag-NPs for SERS measurements. Complexing agents of ammonia and ethyl amine offered the best performances. The optimal concentration of complexing agent was found to be approximately six times the concentration of silver ions. With a reaction time of 2 min, the optimized concentrations of glucose and silver nitrate were 0.5 M and 50 mM, respectively. In general, the enhancement factor was on the order of 10⁵ to 10⁶ for the substrates prepared in this work.

Keywords

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering Raman spectroscopy Nanoparticles SERS substrate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fleischman

Hendra

P. J.

and McQuillan

, Chem. Phys. Lett. 26, 163 (1974).

Jeanmarie

D. L.

and Van Duyne

R. P

, J. Electroanal. Chem. 84, 1 (1977).

Albrecht

M. G.

and Creighton

J. A

, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, 5215 (1977).

Moskovits

, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 783 (1985).

Kneipp

Itzkan

Dasari

R. R.

and Feld

M. S

, Chem. Rev. 99, 2957 (1999).

Mulvaney

S. P.

and Keating

C. D

, Anal. Chem. 72, 145R (2000).

Haynes

C. L.

McFarland

A. D.

and Van Duyne

R. P

, Anal. Chem. 77, 338A (2005).

Brolo

A. G.

Germain

and Hager

G. J

, J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 5982 (2002).

Yang

X. M.

Ajito

Tryk

D. A.

Hashimoto

and Fujishima

, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 7293 (1996).

10.

Lee

P. C.

and Meisel

, J. Phys. Chem. 86, 3391 (1982).

11.

Creighton

J. A.

Blatchford

C. G.

and Albrecht

M. G

, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 75, 790 (1979).

12.

Leopold

and Lendl

, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 5723 (2003).

13.

Y. S.

Cheng

and Coons

L. B

, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 55, 1197 (1999).

14.

Chaney

S. B.

Shanmukh

Dluhy

R. A.

and Zhao

Y. P

, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 31908 (2005).

15.

Bao

Mahurin

S. M.

Haire

R. G.

and Dai

, Anal. Chem. 75, 6614 (2003).

16.

Farquharson

Shende

Inscore

F. E.

Maksymiuk

and Gift

, J. Raman Spectrosc. 36, 208 (2005).

17.

Lee

Y. H.

Dai

S. S.

and Young

J. P

, J. Raman Spectrosc. 28, 635 (1997).

18.

Murphy

Schmidt

and Kronfeldt

H. D

, Appl. Phys. B 69, 147 (1999).

19.

Xue

and Dong

, Anal. Chem. 63, 2393 (1991).

20.

Zhao

and Li

, Langmuir 15, 4625 (1999).

21.

and Cotton

T. M

, Anal. Chem. 58, 3159 (1986).

22.

Saito

Wang

J. J.

Batchelder

D. N.

and Smith

D. A

, Langmuir 18, 2959 (2002).

23.

Wang

and Rothberg

L. J

, Appl. Phys. B 84, 289 (2006).

24.

Park

H. K.

Yoon

J. K.

and Kim

, Langmuir 22, 1626 (2006).

25.

Yang

Bittner

A. M.

and Kern

, J. Solid. State. Electrochem. 11, 150 (2007).

26.

Norrod

K. L.

Sudnik

L. M.

Rousell

and Rowlen

K. L

, Appl. Spectrosc. 51, 994 (1997).

27.

Skadtchenko

B. O.

and Aroca

, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 57, 1009 (2001).

28.

Zhang

and Imae

, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 233, 99 (2001).