Investigation of the Mixing Efficiency of a Chaotic Micromixer Using Thermal Lens Spectrometry

Abstract

This work investigates the efficiency of a chaotic micromixer using thermal lens spectrometry. The outlet of the mixing device was connected to a thermal lens detection head integrating the probe beam optical fibers and the sample capillary. The chaotic micromixer consisted of a Y-shaped poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) microchip in which ribbed herringbone microstructures were etched on the floor of the main channel. Due to the solvent composition dependence of the thermal lens response, the photothermal method was shown to be highly sensitive to nonhomogeneous mixing compared to fluorescence detection. The apparatus was applied to the determination of Fe²⁺ with 1,10-phenanthroline using flow injection analysis; a limit of detection of 11 μg L⁻¹ of iron was obtained.

Keywords

Thermal lens detection Chaotic micromixer Mixing efficiency Flow injection analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bialkowski

S. E.

, “Photothermal Spectroscopy Methods for Chemical Analysis”, in Chemical Analysis, Winefordner

J. D.

Ed. (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1996), Vol. 134.

Ghaleb

K. Abbas

and Georges

, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 60, 2793 (2004).

Bruin

G. J. M.

, Electrophoresis 21, 3931 (2000).

Kikutami

Tokeshi

Sato

and Kitamori

, Pure Appl. Chem. 74, 2299 (2002).

Le Gac

and Rolando

, L'Actualité Chimique, Février, 21 (2002).

Ismagilov

R. F.

Rosmarin

Kenis

P. J. A.

Chiu

D. T.

Zhang

Stone

H. A.

and Whitesides

G. M

, Anal. Chem. 73, 4682 (2001).

Kenis

P. J. A.

Ismagilov

R. F.

Takayama

Whitesides

G. M.

S. L.

and White

H. S

, Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 841 (2000).

Guenther

Jhunjhunwala

Thalmann

Schmidt

M. A.

and Jensen

K. F

, Langmuir 21, 1547 (2005).

Dodge

Jullien

M.-C.

Lee

Y.-K.

Niu

Okkels

and Tabeling

, Comptes Rendus Physique 5, 557 (2004).

10.

Song

Bringer

M. R.

Tice

J. D.

Gerdts

C. J.

and Ismagilov

R. F

, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 4664 (2003).

11.

Liu

R. H.

Stremler

M. A.

Sharp

K. V.

Olsen

M. G.

Santiago

J. G.

Adrian

R. J.

Aref

and Beebe

D. J

, J. Microelectromech. Syst. 9, 190 (2000).

12.

Stroock

A. D.

Dertinger

S. K. W.

Ajdari

Mezic

Stone

H. A.

and Whitesides

G. M

, Science (Washington, D.C.) 295, 647 (2002).

13.

Xia

H. M.

Wan

S. Y. M.

Shu

and Chew

Y. T

, Lab Chip 5, 748 (2005).

14.

Kim

D. J.

H. J.

Park

T. H.

Choo

J. B.

and Lee

S. H

, Analyst (Cambridge, U.K.) 130, 293 (2005).

15.

Ghaleb

K. Abbas

and Georges

, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 61, 2849 (2005).

16.

Ferrigno

Ng Lee

Jiang

and Whitesides

G. M

, Anal. Chem. 76, 2273 (2004).

17.

Růžička

and Hansen

E. H

, “Flow Injection Analysis”, in Chemical Analysis, Winefordner

J. D.

Ed. (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1988), Vol. 62.

18.

Pfahler

Harley

Bau

and Zemel

, Sens. Actuators A 21–23, 431 (1990).

19.

CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, New York, 1977–1978), 58th ed.

20.

Matsumoto

Lamprecht

North

M. R.

and Swaddle

T. W

, Can. J. Chem. 79, 1864 (2001).

21.

Arnaud

and Georges

, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 60, 1817 (2004).