Multicomponent Peak Modeling of Protein Secondary Structures: Comparison of Gaussian with Lorentzian Analytical Methods for Plant Feed and Seed Molecular Biology and Chemistry Research

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare Gaussian and Lorentzian multicomponent peak modeling methods in quantification of protein secondary structures of various plant seed and feed tissues within intact tissue at a cellular and subcellular level using the advanced synchrotron light sourced Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) microspectroscopy (S-FTIR). This experiment was performed at the beamline U10B at the National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) in Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), U.S. Dept of Energy (NSLS-BNL, NY). The results show that in the comparison of the Gaussian and Lorentzian multi-peak modeling methods, the Gaussian method is more accurate for fitting multi-peak curves of protein secondary structures than the Lorentzian method, with higher modeling R² values (0.92 versus 0.89, P < 0.05). There were no large differences (P > 0.05) in the quantification of the relative percentage of α-helices, β-sheets, and others in protein secondary structures of the plant seed tissues, with averages of 30.2%, 40.4%, and 29.4%, respectively. However, there are significant differences (P < 0.05) in the quantification of the ratios of β-sheet to α-helix (1.42 versus 1.60; SEM = 0.058) in protein secondary structures of the plant seed tissues. With synchrotron FT-IR microspectroscopy, the ultrastructural–chemical makeup and nutritive characteristics could be revealed at a high spatial resolution. Synchrotron-based FT-IR microspectroscopy revealed that the secondary structure of protein differed between the plant seed tissues in terms of relative percentage and ratio of protein secondary structures (α-helix and β-sheet) within cellular dimensions. The results also show that the flaxseed tissues contained higher (P < 0.05) percentage of α-helix (38.6 versus 24.0%) and β-sheet (45.3 versus 36.9%), lower (P < 0.05) percentage of other secondary structures (16.1% versus 39.0%), and higher (P < 0.05) ratios of α-helix to β-sheet (0.90 versus 0.69) than the winterfat seed tissues. It must be mentioned that the relative percentages of protein secondary structure may not reflect the true secondary structure. However, the purpose of modeling the relative percentage of secondary structure was to detect the variety of differences among seed/feed/plant tissues and their relation to nutritive value and digestive behavior. The results demonstrate the potential of highly spatially resolved synchrotron-based FT-IR microspectroscopy to reveal protein secondary structures of the plant seed/feed tissues. Further study is needed to quantify the relationship between protein secondary structures and nutrient availability and digestive behavior of various varieties of plant seed tissues. Information from the infrared probing of protein secondary structures can be valuable as a guide to maintaining protein nutritive value and quality for animal and human use.

Keywords

Molecular chemistry Structural biology Multi-peak modeling Gaussian method Lorentzian method Protein secondary structure Amide I Synchrotron light Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy FT-IR microspectroscopy Plant seed tissues

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wetzel

D. L.

Eilert

A. J.

Pietrzak

L. N.

Miller

S. S.

and Sweat

J. A

, Cell. Mol. Biol. 44, 145 (1998).

, Brit. J. Nutri. 92, 869 (2004).

Miller

L. M.

, Synchrotron Radiat. News 13, 3 (2000).

Miller

L. M.

, Infrared Microsperctroscopy and Imaging, http://nslsweb.nsls.bnl.gov/nsls/pubs/nslspubs/imaging0502/irxrayworkshopintroduction.ht, accessed October 2002.

Dumas

, Synchrotron IR Microspectroscopy: A Multidisciplinary Analytical Technique, in the 6th Annual Synchrotron CLS Users' Meeting and Associated Synchrotron Workshops—WinXAS and Infrared. University of Saskatchewan, Canada, November 13–15, 2003.

Holman

H.-Y. N.

Bjornstad

K. A.

McNamara

M. P.

Martin

M. C.

McKinney

W. R.

and Blakely

E. A

, J. Biomed. Opt. 7, 1 (2002).

Marinkovic

N. S.

Huang

Bromberg

Sullivan

Toomey

Miller

L. M.

Sperber

Moshe

Jones

K. W.

Chouparova

Lappi

Franzen

and Chance

M. R

, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 9, 189 (2002).

Dyson

H. J.

and Wright

P. E

, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 3, 60 (1990).

Carey

F. A.

, Organic Chemistry (McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, 1996), 3rd ed.

10.

McKinnon

J. J.

Christensen

C. R.

and Christensen

D. A

, J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 7353 (2004).

11.

Kemp

, Organic Spectroscopy (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1991), 3rd ed.

12.

Himmelsbach

D. S.

Khalili

and Akin

D. E

, Cell. Mol. Biol. 44, 99 (1998).

13.

Wetzel

D. L.

Srivarin

and Finney

J. R

, Vib. Spectrosc. 31, 109 (2003).

14.

Jackson

and Mantsch

H. H

, “Infrared Spectroscopy Ex Vivo Tissue Analysis”, in Biomedical Spectroscopy (2000).

15.

Wetzel

D. L.

, “When Molecular Causes of Wheat Quality are Known, Molecular Methods will Supercede Traditional Methods”, in Proc. Int'l Wheat Quality Conf. II (Manhattan, Kansas, May, 2001), pp. 1–20.

16.

Christensen

D. A.

Christensen

C. R.

Drew

M. D.

Rossnagel

B. G.

and McKinnon

J. J

, Can. J. Animal Sci. 84, 523 (2004).

17.

SAS, User's Guide: Statistics (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, North Carolina, 1998), 8th ed.

18.

Steel

R. G.

and Torrie

J. H

, Principles and Procedures of Statistics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).

19.

McKinnon

J. J.

Christensen

C. R.

and Christensen

D. A

, “Mapping Plant Composition with Synchrotron Infrared Microspectroscopy and Relation to Animal Nutrient Utilization”, in Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Animal Science—Conference (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, June 10–13, 2003), pp. 1–20.

20.

McKinnon

J. J.

Christensen

C. R.

Christensen

D. A.

Marinkovic

N. S.

and Miller

L. M

, J. Agric. Food Chem. 51, 6062 (2003).

21.

Seguchi

Takemoto

Mizutani

Ozawa

Nakamura

and Matsumura

, Cereal Chem. 81, 633 (2004).

22.

Martin

M. C.

, Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, http://infrared.als.lbl.gov/, accessed October 2002.

23.

McKinnon

J. J.

Soita

Christensen

D. A.

and Christensen

C. R

, “Protein Secondary Structures of Flaxseed Tissues (with Heterogeneous Matrix of Endosperm) Affected by Variety and Heat Processing, in Relation to Nutritive Value of Protein: Use of Synchrotron-Based FTIR Microspectroscopy”, in The 96th American Oil Chemists Society (AOCS) Conference and Expo (Salt Lake City, Utah, May 1–4, 2005).