Stages-of-growth models have been applied to a variety of organisations to understand organisational evolution over time. In this article, the case of oversight agencies is explored. Some oversight agencies are more advanced than others and have more appropriate procedures, more advanced knowledge, more successful approaches, and more professional performance management. The advancement and sophistication of an oversight organisation may be determined by means of maturity levels for oversight agencies, as discussed in this article.
BenbasatI.DexterA. S.DruryD. H.GoldsteinR. H. (1984) ‘A Critique of the Stage Hypothesis: Theory and Empirical Evidence’Communications of the ACM27(5): 476–85.
2.
BennetA.BennetD. (2005a) ‘Designing the Knowledge Organization of the Future: The Intelligent Complex Adaptive System’, in HolsappleC.W. (ed.), Handbook of Knowledge Management. Doetinchem, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media, vol. 2, pp.623–38.
3.
BennetD.BennetA. (2005b) ‘The Rise of the Knowledge Organization’, in HolsappleC.W. (ed.), Handbook of Knowledge Management, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media, vol. 1, pp.5–20.
4.
BockG.W.ZmudR.W.KimY.G. (2005) ‘Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate’MIS Quarterly29(1): 87–111.
5.
BrownS.D. (2007) ‘The Meaning of Criminal Intelligence’International Journal of Police Science & Management9(4): 336–40.
6.
BrownJ.S.DuguidP. (2001) ‘Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective’Organization Science12(2): 198–213.
7.
FichmanR.G.KemererC.F. (1997) ‘The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning Perspective’Management Science43(10): 1345–63.
8.
Frankfort-NachmiasC.NachmiasD. (2002) Research Methods in the Social Sciences (5th edn). London, UK: Arnold.
9.
GarudR.KumaraswamyA. (2005) ‘Vicious and Virtuous Circles in the Management of Knowledge: The Case of Infosys Technologies’MIS Quarterly29(1): 9–33.
10.
GottschalkP.KarlsenJ.T. (2008) ‘How Knowledge Organizations Work: The Case of Law Firms’International Journal of Knowledge and Learning4(4): 349–56.
11.
GottschalkP.KhandelwalV.K. (2004) ‘Stages of Growth for Knowledge Management Technology in Law Firms’Journal of Computer Information Systems44(4): 111–24.
12.
KarkR.Van DijkD. (2007) ‘Motivation to Lead, Motivation to Follow: The Role of the Self-regulatory Focus in Leadership Processes’Academy of Management Review32(2): 500–28.
13.
KazanjianR.K.DrazinR. (1989) ‘An Empirical Test of a Stage of Growth Progression Model’Management Science35(12): 1489–503.
14.
KingW.R.TeoT.S.H. (1997) ‘Integration between Business Planning and Information Systems Planning: Validating a Stage Hypothesis’Decision Science28(2): 279–308.
15.
LaiseD.MigliareseP.VerteremoS. (2005) ‘Knowledge Organization Design: A Diagnostic Tool’Human Systems Management24: 121–31.
16.
LassenC.LaugenB.T.NæssP. (2006) ‘Virtual Mobility and Organizational Reality: A note on the Mobility Needs in Knowledge Organizations’Transportation Research Part D, 11: 459–63.
17.
LiebowitzJ. (2004) ‘Will Knowledge Management Work in the Government?’Electronic Government: An International Journal1(1): 1–7.
18.
LiuC.C.ChenS.Y. (2005) ‘Determinants of Knowledge Sharing of e-Learners’International Journal of Innovation and Learning2(4): 434–45.
19.
NolanR.L. (1979) ‘Managing the Crisis in Data Processing’Harvard Business Review57(2): 115–26.
20.
NonakaI.ToyamaR.KonnoN. (2000) ‘SECI, Ba [place] and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation’Long Range Planning33(1): 5–34.
21.
NunnallyJ.C.BernsteinI.H. (1994) Psychometric Theory (3rd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
PrenzlerT.LewisC. (2005) ‘Performance Indicators for Police Oversight’Australian Journal of Public Administration64(2): 77–83.
23.
SmithG. (2009) Opinion of the Commissioner for Human Rights Concerning Independent and Effective Determination of Complaints against the Police. Strasbourg: Commissioner for Human Rights, Council of Europe.
24.
TaylorA.GreveH.R. (2006) ‘Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams’Academy of Management Journal49(4): 723–40.
25.
TurnerK.L.MakhijaM.V. (2006) ‘The Role of Organizational Controls in Managing Knowledge’Academy of Management Review31(1): 197–217.
26.
United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2006) The Integrity and Accountability of the Police: Criminal Justice Assessment Toolkit. Vienna, Austria: UNODC Vienna International Center, http://www.unodc.org.
27.
UretskyM. (2001) ‘Preparing for the Real Knowledge Organization’Journal of Organizational Excellence21(1): 87–93.
28.
VenkateshV. (2000) ‘Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into Technology Acceptance Model’Information Systems Research11(4): 342–65.
29.
VenkateshV.DavisF.D. (2000) ‘A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies’Management Science46(2): 186–204.
30.
WaskoM.M.FarajS. (2005) ‘Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice’MIS Quarterly29(1): 35–57.
