Attorney-General's Reference (No. 5 of 2002) [2004] UKHL40, [2005] 1 AC 167
2.
JonathanFisherQCWhy Intercept Evidence Should Be Admissible in Criminal Proceedings, Society of Conservative Lawyers, July 2005, available at www.conservativelawyers.com/, accessed 9 November 2006
3.
Interception of Communications (Admissibility of Evidence) Bill 2005, Hansard, House of Lords, vol. 675, cols 1301–1336, 18 November 2005
4.
Jasper v United Kingdom (2000) 30 EHRR 441, [2000] Crim LR 586
Morgans v DPP [2001] 1 AC 315, [2000] 2 All ER 522
8.
MurphyPeterMurphy on Evidence (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2005) 53–5
9.
PG and JH v United Kingdom, The Times (19 October 2001), [2002] Crim LR 308
10.
Privy Counsellor Review Committee, Anti-terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001 Review: Report, December 2003, available at www.statewatch.org/news/2003/dec/atcsReport.pdf, accessed 9 November 2006
11.
R v Preston [1994] 2 AC 130, [1993] 4 All ER 638
12.
R v Sargent [2001] UKHL 54, [2003] 1 AC 347
13.
R v Stanford [2006] EWCA Crim 258
14.
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, s. 17
