Abstract
Under the current law, where evidence of jury impropriety has become known following a trial, the Court of Appeal cannot investigate jury deliberations to determine if the verdict is unsafe. This article considers whether the justifications for this rule, and the safeguards present in a jury trial, are sufficient to justify the prohibition. It concludes that they are not. The rule is indefensible, and investigations should be permitted in certain circumstances.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
