A literature review suggests that height has always been a part of the assessment of suitability in police culture, and this may be linked to myths about a tall person's better physical skills and suitability for police work. In contrast to the above-mentioned assumptions, this study shows that short police students of both sexes generally perform better in physical tests than tall police students. Despite this, short women assess their physical skills as poorer than do tall women. This discrepancy is discussed, and several factors seem to explain this phenomenon. Police culture seems to link being tall with physical ability. The value placed on height can be explained by the fact that tall men represent and symbolise the police best. A contributing explanation to the discrepancy could be that height creates a natural physical authority among tall police officers, which short female officers are missing. Another explanation of the discrepancy may be that height and long arms can be beneficial in situations in which the police have to use physical force. However, it is argued that the police rarely use physical force, and that several other factors seem to reduce the importance of height in this area.
ÅbergB. (2001). Samarbete på könsblandade arbetsplatser. En könsteoretisk analys av arbetsdelning mellom kvinnor och män i två yrken: Akutsjuksköterskor och ordningspoliser. Örebro Studies in Sociology 1.Örebro, Sweden: Örebro universitetsbibliotek.
2.
AbrahamsenS.StrypeJ. (2010). Are they all the same? Norwegian police officers personality characteristics and tactics of conflict resolution. Policing and Society, 20 (1), 99–123.
3.
AllernS.PollackE. (2009). Politikritikk i nyhetsbildet. In FlaattenS.GundhusH. I.KleivenM. E. (Eds.), Demokrati, kontroll og tillit (pp. 79–101). PHS Forskning 2009:4. Oslo: Politihøgskolen.
4.
AnderssonS. (2003). Ordnande praktiker. En studie av status, homosocialitet och maskuliniteter utifrån två närplisorganisationer (Doctoral thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden).
5.
ÅseC. (2000). Makten att se. Om kropp og kvinnelighet i lagens namn. Malmø, Sweden: Liber.
6.
BergB. L. (1999). Policing in modern society. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann.
7.
BonneauJ.BrownJ. (1995). Physical ability, fitness and police work: A Canadian perspective. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 2, 157–164.
8.
BrandiS.HildebrandtS.NordhaugI.NordhaugO. (2004). Inkluderingsledelse. Utnyttelse av mangfold i arbeidslivet. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
9.
BirzerM. L.CraigD. E. (1996). Gender differences in police physical ability test performance. American Journal of Police, 15 (2), 93–108.
10.
CarlströmA. K. (1999). På spaning i Stockholm. En etnologisk studie av polisarbete. Institutet för folklivsforskning — etnologiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.
11.
ChanJ. (2003). Conclusion: Learning the art of policing. In ChanJ. (Ed.), Fair cop. Learning the art of policing (pp. 301–316). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
12.
Dothard v. Rawlingson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977).
13.
DregeG. B.NyttingnesB. (1999). Dagens politikvinne: Vakker og myndig? En kvalitativ intervjuundersøkelse (Thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway).
14.
EngenS. (2009). Politiutdanning på ville veier. Politiforum, 12, 41–42.
15.
FieldingN. (1994). Cop canteen culture. In NewburnT.StankoE. A. (Eds.), Just boys doing business? Men, masculinities and crime (pp. 46–63). London: Routledge.
16.
FinstadL. (1998). En av Gutta? Om kjønn i politiet. In KongstadA.KyvsgaardB.StorgaardA. (Eds.), Kvinder på randen (pp. 180–198). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus universitetsforlag.
GrevstadC. (2005). Police, power and authority. A study of police–public relations in western Norway. (Master's thesis, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway).
19.
GundhusH. I. (2009). For sikkerhets skyld. IKT, yrkeskulturer og kunnskapsarbeid i politiet. Oslo: Unipub.
20.
HerbertS. (2001). ‘Hard sharger’ or ‘station queen’? Policing and the masculinist state. Gender, Place and Culture, 8 (1), 55–71.
21.
HesjedalJ. (1996). Kvinner i politiet. En studie av internasjonal forskning. Oslo: PHS forskning.
22.
HoelL. (2010 December 9). Doctoral dissertation, final seminar. University of Nordland.
23.
HolmbergL. (1999). Politiets skøn i retssocologisk belysning. Copenhagen: Dr. avhandling.
24.
HunterS. K.CritchlowA.ShinI. S.EnokaR. M. (2004). Men are more fatigable than strength-matched women when performing intermittent submaximal contractions. Journal of Applied Physiology, 96 (6), 2125–2132. Epub 2004, February 13.
25.
Idrettfaget ved PHS 2007/2008 [Curriculum for the subject of physical fitness at the Police University College]. Idrettslærerne, Politihøgskolen.
26.
LagestadP. (2008). Politiets bruk av fysisk makt. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 95 (3), 298–314.
27.
LagestadP. (2011). Fysisk styrke eller bare prat. Betydningen kjønn har i fysisk aktivitet og politiets ordenstjeneste (PhD thesis, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway).
28.
LagestadP. (2012). Does size matter? Manus.
29.
LarsenR. (1946). Fra vekterstuen til Møllergaten 19: Erindringer fra 44 års tjeneste ved Oslopolitiet. Oslo: Aschehoug.
30.
LarssonP. (2010). Fra armsterke bondesønner til akademikerbarn. Om rekrutteringen til politiyrket. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 97 (2), 150–159.
31.
LauritzL. E. (2009). Spirande polisidentiteter: En studie av politistudenters och nya polisers profesionella identitet. Umeå, Sweden: Handelshögskolan, Umeå universitet.
32.
LesterD.SheehanD. (1980). Attitudes of supervisors toward short police officers. Psychological Reports, 47 (2), 462.
33.
LieA. L.LagestadP. (2011). Arrestasjonsteknikk. 2. Politihøgskolen, Gyldendal, Oslo.
34.
LonswayK. A. (2003). Tearing down the wall: Problems with consistency, validity and adverse impact of physical agility testing in police selection. Police Quarterly, 6 (3), 237–277.
35.
LönnI.LönnP.HansenA. R. (2006). Vi tar pulsen på polisen. Svensk idrottsforskning, 4, 29–32.
36.
MillerS. L. (1998). The tangled web of feminism and community policing. In: MillerS. L. (Ed.), Crime, control and women. Feminist implications of criminal justice policy (pp. 95–112). London: Sage.
37.
RahtzH. (2003). Understanding police use of force. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
38.
ReinerR. (2000). Politics of the police. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
SheehanD.LesterD. (1980). Attitudes of short versus tall police officers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51(3), 878.
40.
ShephardR. J.BonneauJ. (2003). Assuring gender equity in recruitment standards for police officers. Canadian Journal Applied Physiology, 27 (3), 263–295.
41.
TalbertT. L.RonanW. W.AndersonC. L.FeehanR.RogersJ. (1974). A study of the police officer height requirement. Public Personnel Management, 3 (2), 103–110.
42.
TerrillW. (2003). Police use of force and suspect resistance: The micro process of the police–suspect encounter. Police Quarterly, 6 (1), 51–83.
WhitakerG. P. (1999). What is patrol work? In GainesL. K.CordnerG. W. (Eds.), Policing perspectives. An anthology (pp. 213–224). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
45.
WhiteT. W.BlochP. B. (1975). Police officer height and selected aspects of performance. Rockville, MD: National Criminal Justice Reference Service.
46.
WilloughbyK. R.BlountW. R. (1985). The relationship between law enforcement officer height, aggression, and job performance. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 13 (3), 225–228.
