This paper considers the relevance of police independence in light of developments in police accountability mechanisms in the UK that encourage the police to be more locally responsive. It presents an argument concerning the need for balance in police governance between competing claims and interests. The paper notes the danger of exaggerated forms of accountability arising as a consequence of the inherent tensions within police governance, if the importance of a particular concern is overstated inappropriately at the expense of others. The current focus on being responsive at the expense of recognising the importance of police independence is presented as an example of such a danger. The paper acknowledges the extent to which traditional arguments in support of police independence have been criticised and accepts the need for the police to work interdependently with other bodies within the community. However, it is argued that this should not be interpreted to mean that police independence is redundant. Indeed, it is argued here that the more responsive the police are, the more important their independence becomes.
BantonM. (1964). The Policeman in the Community. London: Tavistock.
4.
BayleyD. (2002). Law Enforcement and the rule of law: Is there a tradeoff?Criminology and Public Policy, 2, No.1, November, pp. 133–154.
5.
BlunkettD.Rt. Hon. (2003). Civil Renewal: A New Agenda. London: Home Office.
6.
CrawfordA. (2001). Public Matters. Reviving Public Participation in Criminal Justice. London: IPPR.
7.
DixonB.SmithG. (1998). Laying down the law: The police, the courts and legal accountability. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 26: 419–435.
8.
EdmundsonW.A. (1998). Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
EricsonR.V. (1995). ‘The news media and account ability in criminal justice’. In StenningPhilip C. (Ed.), Accountability for Criminal Justice (pp. 135–161). Toronto: Toronto University Press.
10.
GoldsmithA.J.LewisC., (Eds), (2000). Civilian Oversight of Policing. Governance, Democracy and Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
11.
GoldsteinH. (1977). Policing A Free Society. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
12.
Home Office (2003). Policing: Building Safer Communities Together. London: Home Office.
13.
Home Office (2004). Building Communities, Beating Crime. A Better Police Service for the 21st Century. London: Home Office.
14.
HughesG. (2002). Crime and Disorder reduction partnerships. The future of community safety? In HughesG.McLaughlinE.MuncieJ. (Eds.), Crime Prevention and Community Safety. New Directions (pp. 123–141). London: Sage.
15.
JohnstonL. (2000). Policing Britain: Risk, Security and Governance. London: Longman.
16.
JonesT. (2003). The governance and accountability of policing. In NewburnT. (Ed.), Handbook of Policing (pp. 603–627). Cullompton, Devon: Willan.
17.
KaufmanFredHon., (1999). Review of the Nova Scotia Public Prosecution Service: Final Report. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Nova Scotia Provincial Government.
18.
KleinigJ. (1996a). The Ethics of Policing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
KleinigJ., (Ed.) (1996b). Handled with Discretion. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
20.
LoaderI. (2000). Plural policing and democratic governanceSocial and Legal Studies, 9(3), 323–345.
21.
LovedayB. (1993). The local accountability of police in England and Wales: Future prospects. In ReinerR.SpencerS. (Eds.), Accountable Policing: Effectiveness, Empowerment and Equity (pp. 55–80). London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
22.
LustgartenL. (1986). The Governance of Police. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
23.
MarshallG. (1978). ‘Police accountability revisited’, in ButlerD.HalseyA. (Eds.), Policy and Politics. London: Macmillan.
24.
NewburnT. (2002). Community safety and policing: Some implications of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. In HughesG.McLaughlinE.MuncieJ. (Ed.), (2002). Crime Prevention and Community Safety. New Directions. London: Sage.
25.
NeyroudP. W. (2001). Public Participation in Policing. London: IPPR.
26.
NeyroudP. W. (2003). Policing and ethics. In NewburnT. (Ed.) Handbook of Policing (pp. 578–602). Cullompton, Devon: Willan.
27.
NeyroudP.W.BeckleyA. (2001). Policing, Ethics and Human Rights. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.
28.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2002). Crime and neighbourhood renewal. Factsheet No.7. London: Neighbourhood Renewal Unit.
29.
OliverI. (1987). Police, Government and Accountability. London: Macmillan Press.
30.
PattenC. (1999). A New Beginning. Policing in Northern Ireland. The Report of the Independent Commission on Policing for Northern Ireland (Patten Report). London: HMSO.
31.
ReinerR. (1993). Police accountability: Principles, patterns and practices. In ReinerR.SpencerS. (Eds.), Accountable Policing: Effectiveness, Empowerment and Equity (pp. 1–23). London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
32.
ReinerR. (1995). Counting the coppers: Antinomies of accountability in policing. In StenningP. C. (Ed.). Accountability for Criminal Justice (pp. 74–92). Toronto: Toronto University Press.
33.
ReinerR. (2000). The Politics of the Police. (3rd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
Royal Commission on the Police (1962). Final Report of the Royal Commission on the Police. Cmnd.1782. London: HMSO.
35.
SheptyckiJ.W.E. (2002). Accountability across the policing field: Towards a general cartography of accountability for postmodern policing. Policing and Society, 12(4), pp. 323–338.
36.
SmithG. (2004). What's law got to do with it? Some reflections on the police in light of developments in New York City. In BurkeR. H. (Ed.), Hard Cop, Soft Cop. Dilemmas and debates in contemporary policing (pp. 193–207). Cullompton, Devon: Willan.
37.
StenningP.C. (1994). Police and politics: There and back and there again? In MacleodR.C.SchneidermannD. (Eds.), Police Powers in Canada: The Evolution and Practice of Authority. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
38.
StenningP.C. (1995). Introduction. In StenningP. C. (Ed.), Accountability for Criminal Justice (pp. 3–14). Toronto: Toronto University Press.
39.
StenningP.C. (1999). The independence and accountability of the office of Director of Public Prosecutions, and the role of public prosecutions service, in Nova Scotia. Appendix D. In The Hon. F. Kaufman, Review of the Nova Scotia Public Prosecution Service: Final Report. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Nova Scotia Provincial Government.
40.
SullivanR.R. (2003). Police Reform Act 2002: A radical interpretation. Criminal Law Review pp. 468–470.
41.
UglowS. (1988). Policing Liberal Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
