Abstract
This article offers an analysis of the compatibility between the emerging concept of environmental justice and a number of more well established environmental principles. These include the precautionary principle, the polluter pays principle and sustainable development. The article argues that, for all three principles, a comparison with environmental justice gives rise to conflicts as well as conformity. The main reason for this is the ambiguity and inconsistency of environmental justice and the three principles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
