The American public and government response to media reports of pharmacists refusing to fill prescriptions due to moral objections could fundamentally alter health care. Denying one group of citizens the right to act on their conscience puts each citizen in jeopardy of losing First Amendment rights. Denying healthcare professionals the right to act on their conscience puts patients at risk of being cared for by those who are less than professional, those whose character attributes essential to quality care are compromised. We can define better solutions for access to legal prescriptions and therapies without demanding that healthcare professionals become complicit in activities they deem immoral
CurlinFA, LawrenceRE, ChinMH, LantosJD. Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices. N Engl J Med2004; 356: 593-600.
5.
CantorJ, BaumK.The limits of conscientious objection—may pharmacists refuse to fill prescriptions for emergency contraception?N Engl J Med2007; 351: 2008-12.
6.
GenuisSJ. Dismembering the ethical physician. Postgrad Med J2006; 82: 233-8. DOI 10.1136/pgmj.2005.037754
7.
HutchinsonWT, RachalWME eds. The papers of James Madison. Vol. 1. Chicago and Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1962–1991:175.
8.
PedenW, ed. Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 17. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1954:159.
9.
PellegrinoED, ThomasmaDC. The virtues of medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
10.
CurlinF.Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices (letter). N Engl J Med2007; 356: 1889-92.
