Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of patients with α-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency syndrome and compare Aralast with Prolastin, 2 of the 3 available human plasma–derived AAT agents.
DATA SOURCES
Articles were identified using a MEDLINE (1966–September 2005) search with MESH headings that included α-antitrypsin and emphysema.
STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION
All papers from peer-reviewed journals on the laboratory or clinical efficacy of plasma-derived AAT (eg, Prolastin, Aralast) for patients with this autosomal recessive disorder were reviewed.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Clinical trials found that AAT augmentation prevents progression of AAT-deficient emphysema and thus its associated morbidity and mortality. Treatment with Aralast has been shown to be safe and well tolerated, with a low incidence of mild to moderate adverse events. Pharmacoeconomics studies of AAT augmentation demonstrated that the use of Aralast was cost-effective as lifelong augmentation therapy for AAT-deficient emphysema.
CONCLUSIONS
Because of its effectiveness and extra safety measure compared with Prolastin, Aralast should be recommended for formulary inclusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
