Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To conduct a retrospective evaluation of tetrahydropyranyladriamycin (PIR)-based combination chemotherapy for osteosarcomas in comparison with doxorubicin (DOX)-based regimens to determine differences in response and toxicities between DOX- and PIR-containing regimens.
METHODS:
Toxicities and response rates of the 2 anthracyclines given as combination chemotherapy were assessed in patients with osteosarcoma, with 19 patients receiving PIR-based and 11 receiving DOX-based regimens.
RESULTS:
The survival of osteosarcoma patients treated with PIR was significantly better than that with DOX (p = 0.023) based on 2-year follow-up. Adverse effects such as mucositis and diarrhea were also less pronounced in the PIR cohort.
CONCLUSIONS:
PIR-based combination chemotherapy might be a useful and safe chemotherapeutic strategy for osteosarcomas compared with DOX regimens. Further assessment is necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of this treatment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
