ElixhauserAHalpernMSchmierJLuceM. Health care CBA and CEA from 1991 to 1996: An updated bibliography. Med Care1998;36:MS1–9.
2.
BradleyCAIskedjianMLanctôtKLMittmannNSimoneCSt. PierreEQuality assessment of economic evaluations in selected pharmacy, medical, and health economics journals. Ann Pharmacother1995;29:681–9.
3.
RelmanA. New “information for authors” — And readers (editorial). N Engl J Med1990;323:56.
4.
TaddioAPainTFassosFBoonHIlersichAEinarsonT. Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research in the British Medical Journal, Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. Can Med Assoc J1994;150: 1611–5.
5.
SofferA. Abstracts of clinical investigations: A new and standardized format. Chest1987;92:389–90.
6.
MisiewiczJ. Summaries of papers reporting results of clinical trials. Gut1988;29:273–4.
7.
LockS. Structured abstracts: Now required for all papers reporting clinical trials (editorial). BMJ1988;297:156.
8.
HuthE. Structured abstracts for papers reporting clinical trials (editorial). Ann Intern Med1987;106:626–7.
9.
MulrowCThackerSPughJ. A proposal for more informative abstracts of review articles. Ann Intern Med1988;108:613–5.
10.
SquiresB. Structured abstracts of original research and review articles. Can Med Assoc J1990;143:619–22.
11.
SquiresBKeithRMeakinsJ. Structured abstracts for clinical research manuscripts and reviews. Can J Surg1992;35:473–5.
12.
TrakasKAddisAKrukDBuczekYIskedjianMEinarsonTR. Quality assessment of pharmacoeconomic abstracts of original research articles in selected journals. Ann Pharmacother1997;31:423–8.
13.
SiegelJEWeinsteinMCTorranceGW. Reporting cost-effectiveness studies and results. In: GoldMRSiegelJERussellLBWeinsteinMC, eds. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996:276–303.
14.
SiegelJWeinsteinMRussellLBGoldM, Panel for Cost Effectiveness for Health and Medicine. Recommendation for the reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. JAMA1996;276:1339–41.
15.
Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ann Intern Med1987;106:598–604.
16.
Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCO-HTA). Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: Canada. 2nd ed. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health, 1997.
17.
Ontario Ministry of Health. Ontario guidelines for economic analysis of pharmaceutical products. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health.
18.
England and Wales Department of Health. Guidelines on good practice in the conduct of economic evaluation of medicines. London: Department of Health, 1994.
19.
Australia Commonwealth Department of Health and Housing and Community Services. Guidelines for the pharmaceutical industry on preparation of submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department, 1992.
20.
LangleyPC. The November 1995 revised Australian guidelines for the economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. PharmacoEconomics1996;9: 341–52.
21.
GoldMRSiegelJERussellLBWeinsteinMC, eds. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
22.
SiegelJETorranceGWRussellLBLuceBRWeinsteinMCGoldMGuidelines for pharmacoeconomic studies. PharmacoEconomics1997;11:159–68.
23.
TorranceGWBlakerDDetskyAKennedyWSchubertFMenonDCanadian guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals. PharmacoEconomics1996;9:535–59.
24.
WeinsteinMCSiegelJEGoldMRKamletMSRussellLB, Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA1996;276: 1253–8.
25.
ClemensKTownsendRLuscombeFMauskopfJOsterhausJBobulaJ. Methodological and conduct principles for pharmacoeconomic research. PharmacoEconomics1995;8:169–74.
26.
GarattiniLGrilliRScopellitiDMantovaniL. A proposal for Italian guidelines in pharmacoeconomics. PharmacoEconomics1995;7:1–6.
27.
IkedaSIkegamiNOliverAJIkedaM. A case for the adoption of pharmacoeconomic guidelines in Japan. PharmacoEconomics1996;10:546–51.
28.
RoviraJAntonanzasF. Economic analysis of health technologies and programmes: A Spanish proposal for methodological standardisation. PharmacoEconomics1995;8:245–52.
29.
DrummondMFStoddartGLTorranceGW. Methods for the economic evaluation of healthcare programs. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1987.
30.
JolicoeurLMJones-GrizzleAJBoyerJG. Guidelines for performing a pharmacoeconomic analysis. Am J Hosp Pharm1992;49:1741–7.
31.
FreundDADittusRS. Principles of pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapy. PharmacoEconomics1992;1:20–32.
32.
EisenbergJM. Clinical economics: A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices. JAMA1989;262:2879–86.
33.
LuceBRSimpsonK. Methods of cost-effectiveness analysis: Areas of consensus and debate. Clin Ther1995;17:109–25.
34.
SanchezLA. Evaluating the quality of published pharmacoeconomic evaluations. Hosp Pharm1995;30:151–2.
35.
SacristánJASotoJGalendeI. Evaluation of pharmacoeconomic studies: Utilization of a checklist. Ann Pharmacother1993;27:1126–33.
36.
McGhanWFLewisNJW. Issues in health policy: Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic studies. Clin Ther1992;14:486–94.
37.
GuyattGDrummondMFeenyDTugwellPStoddartGHaynesRBGuidelines for the clinical and economic evaluation of health care technologies. Soc Sci Med1986;22:393–408.