Abstract
Background
Hyperphosphatemia is a common problem in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Calcium-containing phosphate binders are typically used as first-line therapy, primarily due to cost considerations. Non-calcium phosphate binders such as sevelamer and lanthanum may be considered in the appropriate setting. It is hypothesized that lanthanum is less costly and has a lower pill burden compared to sevelamer carbonate.
Objective
Determine the difference in cost (outcome 1) and tablet burden (outcome 2) between sevelamer carbonate and lanthanum within the Veteran population.
Methods
Patients with an active prescription for lanthanum or sevelamer carbonate on October 22, 2014 were evaluated. Chi-square analysis was used to analyze categorical data, and 2-sided t test was used for continuous data. An α of 0.05 determined significance.
Results
One hundred fifty patients were included in the evaluation. Patients were predominately male (96%) and had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD; 78%). The combined rate of non-dialysis CKD (ND-CKD) stage 5 and ESRD was similar between lanthanum and sevelamer carbonate groups. Both groups achieved similar phosphorus control (56% vs 65%, with phosphorus level less than or equal to 5.5 mg/dL, respectively; P = .23). Lanthanum prescriptions required significantly fewer tablets per day (4 lanthanum tablets daily vs 7 sevelamer carbonate tablets daily; P < .001). A potential prescription cost savings of approximately $4,500 monthly or $54,000 annually was seen when considering conversion of patients in this study population from sevelamer carbonate to lanthanum therapy, with appreciable savings beginning at sevelamer daily doses of at least 4,800 mg.
Conclusions
Compared to sevelamer carbonate, lanthanum use was associated with reduced pill burden and lower absolute drug cost while maintaining similar phosphorus control.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.