Institute for Safe Medication Practices.ISMP's list of confused drug names. Available at: www.ismp.org/Tools/confuseddrugnames.pdf. Updated April 1, 2005. Accessed April 3, 2006.
Institute for Safe Medication Practices.New dangers in the drug reimportation process: will we know what our patients are taking?ISMP Med Saf Alert. January 27, 2005. Available at: www.ismp.org/Newsletters/acutecare/articles/20050127.asp?ptr=y. Accessed January 26, 2006.
7.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Public Health Advisory January 2006: Consumers filling U.S. prescriptions abroad may get the wrong active ingredient because of confusing drug names. Available at: www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/reports/confusing-names.html. Accessed January 26, 2006.
8.
BoringD.The development and adoption of nonproprietary, established, and proprietary names for pharmaceuticals. Drug Info J.1997; 31: 621–634.
HolquistC., PhillipsJ.How FDA reviews drug names. Drug Topics.2001; 145: 36.
15.
Food and Drug Administration. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office of Drug Safety Annual Report FY 2004. Available at: www.fda.gov/cder/Offices/ODS/AnnRep2004/default.htm. Accessed April 5, 2006.
16.
MatthewsA.W.When a drug maker launches new baby, Uncle Sam vets name. Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition). New York, NY: March 17, 2006; A1.
17.
ChaseM.Buying the wrong medicine overseas; some foreign brands have same name as U.S. drugs, but different ingredients. Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition). New York, NY: August 16, 2005; D1.
18.
GeorgeC.F.Naming of drugs: pass the epinephrine, please [editorial]. BMJ.1996; 312: 1315–1316.
19.
SweetmanS.C., ed. Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference.London, UK: Pharmaceutical Press; Greenwood Village, CO: Electronic version, Thomson Micromedex; 2006.
20.
Swiss Pharmaceutical Society, ed.Index Nominum: International Drug Directory. Stuttgart, Germany: Medpharm Scientific Publishers; Greenwood Village, CO: Electronic version, Thomson Micromedex; 2006.
21.
NavarroF.A.Naming of drugs. Differences between nomenclatures are much greater than editorial suggested [letter]. BMJ.1996; 313: 688–689.