The increasing prescription of metal-free dental restorations has come about as a result of various patient demands and somewhat narcissistic expectations. However, some dental professionals have contributed to the rise in popularity of these materials and techniques. This article highlights the potential pitfalls of undertaking inherently destructive procedures, particularly when performed for questionable “cosmetic” reasons.
EdelhoffD, SorensenJA.Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.2002;87(5):503–9.
2.
EdelhoffD, SorensenJA.Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry.2002;22(3):241–9.
3.
HeintzeSD, RoussonV.Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. The International Journal of Prosthodontics.2010;23(6):493–502.
4.
FordhamN, LewisM, NaseemS.Aesthetic midline re-alignment using Cad-Cam technology and Straumann Zerion. Dentistry. Educational Supplement Spring2012
5.
BrännströmM, LindPO.Pulpal response to early dental caries. Journal of Dental Research.1965;44(5):1045–50.
Montgomery versus Lanarkshire.Supreme Court Judgement. 2015
8.
AnusaviceKJ.Standardizing Failure, Success, and Survival Decisions in Clinical Studies of Ceramic and Metal-Ceramic Fixed Dental Prostheses. Dental Materials.2012;28(1):102–111.
9.
KellyJR, BenettiP, RungruanganuntP, BonaAD.The slippery slope: critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies. Dental Materials.2012;28(1):41–51.
10.
ZhangY, SailerI, LawnBR.Fatigue of dental ceramics. Journal of Dentistry.2013;41(12):1135–47.
11.
KellyJR.Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.1999;81(6):652–61.
12.
SailerI, MakarovNA, ThomaDS, ZwahlenM, PjeturssonBE.All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dental Materials.2015;31(6):603–23.
13.
KingPA, FosterLV, YatesRJ, NewcombeRG, GarrettMJ.Survival characteristics of 771 resin-retained bridges provided at a UK dental teaching hospital. British Dental Journal.2015;218(7):423–8.
14.
HusseyDL, LindenGJ.The clinical performance of cantilevered resin-bonded bridgework. Journal of Dentistry.1996;24(4):251–6.
15.
RobertsDH.The failure of retainers in bridge prostheses. An analysis of 2,000 retainers. British Dental Journal.1970;128(3):117–24.
16.
AndersonDJ.Tooth movement in experimental malocclusion. Archives Oral Biology.1962;7:7–15.
17.
DahlBL, KrogstadO.The effect of a partial bite raising splint on the occlusal face height. An x-ray cephalometric study in human adults. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica.1982;40(1):17–24.
18.
DahlBL, KrogstadO.The effect of a partial bite-raising splint on the inclination of upper and lower front teeth. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica.1983;41(5):311–4.
19.
KelleherMG, BomfimDl, AustinRS.Biologically based restorative management of tooth wear. International Journal of Dentistry.2012;2012:742509.
20.
Al-KhayattAS, Ray-ChaudhuriA, PoyserNJ, BriggsPF, PorterRW, KelleherMG, EliyasS.Direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition: a 7-year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.2013;40(5):389–401.
21.
ReehES, MesserHH, DouglasWH.Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. Journal of Endodontics.1989;15(11):512–6.
22.
TomsonPL, LumleyPJ, SmithAJ, CooperPR.Growth factor release from dentine matrix by pulp-capping agents promotes pulp tissue repair-associated events. International Endodontic Journal.2017;50(3):281–292.
23.
SmithAJ, DuncanHF, DiogenesA, SimonS, CooperPR.Exploiting the Bioactive Properties of the Dentin-Pulp Complex in Regenerative Endodontics. Journal of Endodontics.2016;42(1):47–56
24.
KrasnerP, RankowHJ.Anatomy of the pulp-chamber floor. Journal of Endodontics.2004;30(1):5–16.
25.
BergenholtzG.Iatrogenic injury to the pulp in dental procedures: aspects of pathogenesis, management and preventive measures. International Dental Journal.1991;41(2):99–110.
26.
CheungGS.A preliminary investigation into the longevity and causes of failure of single unit extracoronal restorations. Journal of Dentistry.1991;19(3):160–3.
27.
JacksonCR, SkidmoreAE, RiceTR.Pulpal evaluation of teeth restored with fixed prostheses. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.1992;67(3):323–5.
28.
ValderhaugJ, JokstadE, AmbjornsenE, NorheimPW.Assessment of the periapical and clinical status of crowned teeth over 25 years. Journal of Dentistry.1997;25(2):97–105.
29.
SaundersWP, SaundersEM.Prevalence of periradicular periodontitis associated with crowned teeth in an adult Scottish subpopulation. British Dental Journal.1998;185:(3):137–40.
30.
CheungGSP, LaiSCN, NgRPY.Fate of vital pulps beneath a metal-ceramic crown or a bridge retainer. International Endodontic Journal.2005;38(8) 521–30.
31.
BurkeFJ, LucarottiPS.Re-intervention on crowns: what comes next?Journal of Dentistry. 2009;37(1):25–30.
32.
GoodacreCJ, BernalG, RungcharassaengK, KanJYK.Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. The Journal of Prosthet Dentistry.2003;90(1):31–41.
33.
BurkeFJT, LucarottiPSK.The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 5: crowns: time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth. British Dental Journal.2018;13;225(1):33–48.
34.
LucarottiPSK, BurkeFJT.The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 6: molar teeth: restoration time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth. British Dental Journal. 2018 28;225(6):525–536.
35.
ReevesR, StanleyHR.The relationship of bacterial penetration and pulpal pathosis in carious teeth. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology.1966;22(1):59–65.
36.
StanleyHR.Local and systemic responses to dental composites and glass ionomers. Advances in Dental Research.1991;6:55–64.
37.
MurrayPE, LumleyPJ, SmithAJ.Preserving the vital pulp in operative dentistry: 3. Thickness of remaining cavity dentine as a key mediator of pulpal injury and repair responses. Dental Update.2002;29(4):172–8.
38.
GarberoglioRB, BrännströmM.Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentinal tubules. Archives of Oral Biology.1976;21(6):355–362.
39.
MjorIA, FerrariM.Pulp-dentine biology in restorative dentistry. Part 6. Reactions to restorative materials, tooth restoration interfaces, and adhesive techniques. Quintessence International.2002;33(1)35–63.
40.
MurrayPE, LumleyPJ, SmithAJ.Preserving the vital pulp in operative dentistry: 2. Guidelines for successful restoration of unexposed dentinal lesions. Dental Update.2002;29(3):127–34.
41.
MurrayPE, SmithAJ, WindsorLJ, MjörIA.Remaining dentine thickness and human pulp responses. International Endodontic Journal.2003;36(1):33–43.
42.
KontakiotisEG, FilippatosCG, StefopoulosS, TzanetakisGN.A prospective study of the incidence of asymptomatic pulp necrosis following crown preparation. International Endodontic Journal.2015;48(6):512–7.
