United Nations Environment Programme.Minamata Convention Agreed by Nations. UNEP website. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/bkkekac. Accessed: 14 April 2014.
2.
LynchCD, WilsonNHF. Managing the phase-down of amalgam (Part I): educational and training issues. Br Dent J2013;215:109–113.
3.
LynchCD, WilsonNHF. Managing the phase-down of amalgam (Part II): implications for practising arrangements and lessons from Norway. Br Dent J2013;215:159–162.
4.
OpdamNJ, BronkhurstEM, RoetersJM, LoomansBA. A retrospective study clinical study on longevity of posterior resin composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater2007;23:2–8.
5.
OpdamNJM, BronkhorstEM, LoomansBAC, HuysmansMC. 12–year survival of resin composite vs amalgam restorations. J Dent Res2010;89:1063–1067.
6.
PallesenU, van DijkenJW, HalkenJ, HallonstenA-L, HöigaardR.Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: A prospective 8 years follow up. J Dent2013;41:297–306.
7.
MjörI, WilsonNHF. Teaching of Class I and Class II direct resin composite resin restorations: results of a survey of dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc1998;129:1415–1419.
8.
WilsonNHF, MjörI.The teaching of class I and class II direct resin composite restorations in European dental schools. J Dent2000;28:15–21.
9.
LynchCD, FrazierKB, McConnellRJ, BlumIR, WilsonNHF. State-of-the-art techniques in Operative Dentistry: contemporary teaching of posterior resin composites in UK and Irish dental schools. Br Dent J2010;209:129–136.
10.
LynchCD, ShortallAC, StewardsonD, TomsonPLBurkeFJT. Teaching posterior composite resin restorations in the United Kingdom and Ireland: consensus views of teachers. Br Dent J2007;203:183–187.
11.
LynchCDGuidance on the use of resin composites for direct restoration of posterior teeth: Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section. J Dent2014;42:377–383.
12.
OpdamNJ, RoetersJJ, KuijsR, BurgersdijkRC. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent1998;80:274–279.
13.
HiltonTJ, FerricaneJL. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures. Amer J Dent1999;12:123–130.
14.
LynchCD, O'SullivanVR, DockeryP, McGillycuddyCT, SloanAJ. Hunter-Schreger Band patterns in human tooth enamel. J Anat2010;217:106–115.
15.
BurrowMF, BanomyongD, HarnirattisaiC, MesserHH. Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite–a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent2009;34:648–655.
16.
PeumansM, KanumilliP, De MunckJ, Van LanduytK, LambrechtsP, Van MeerbeekB.Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater2005;21: 864–881.
17.
KuboS, YokotaH, YokotaH, HayashiY.Two-year clinical evaluation of one-step self-etch systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent2009;37:149–155.
18.
RoggendorfMJ, KrämerN, AppeltA, NaumannM, FrankenbergerR.Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent2011;39:643–647.
19.
VersluisA, TantbirojnD, DouglasWH. Do dental resin composites always shrink toward the light?Journal of Dental Research1998;77:1435–1445.
20.
MullejansR, BadawiMO, RaabWH, LangH.An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded Class II resin composite restorations. Operative Dentistry2003;28:122–126.
21.
LoomansBAC, OpdamNJM, RoetersJFM, Influence of resin composite resin consistency and placement technique on proximal contact tightness of Class II restorations. J Adhes Dent2006;8:305–310.
22.
LoomansBAC, OpdamNJM, RoetersFJM, Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II resin composite resin restorations. J Dent2009;37:712–717.
