MichalakisKX, HirayamaH, SfolkosJ, SfolkosK.Light transmission of posts and cores used for the anterior esthetic region. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.2004;24:462–9.
2.
SorensenJA, EngelmanMJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent.1990;64:419–24.
3.
ToksavulS, TomanM, UyulganB, SchmageP, NergizI.Effect of luting agents and reconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of pre-fabricated post systems. J Oral Rehab.2005; 32:433–40.
4.
NothdurftFP, PospiechPR. Clinical evaluation of pulpless teeth restored with conventionally cemented zirconia posts: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent.2006;95:311–4.
5.
OzkurtZ, IseriU, KazazogluE.Zirconia ceramic post systems: a literature review and a case report. Dent Mater J.2010;29:233–45.
6.
HeydeckeG, ButzF, HusseinA, StrubJR. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent.2002;87:438–45.
7.
HeydeckeG, ButzF, StrubJR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent.2001;29:427–33
8.
El GuindyJ, FoudaMY. Effect of obturating systems, dowel materials, and adhesive luting techniques on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthodont.2010;19:544–52.
9.
DilmenerFT, SipahiC, DalkizM.Resistance of three new esthetic post-and-core systems to compressive loading. J Prosthet Dent.2006;95:130–6.
