This paper presents two examples of unusual radiolucencies caused by grossly distorted anatomy. In the circumstances these could easily have been misdiagnosed as caries. Some of the more common artefacts presenting as caries are discussed. This article highlights the importance of combining radiographical and clinical findings to produce an accurate diagnosis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GuerrieriA, GaucherC, BonteE, LasfarguesJJ. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 4. Detection and diagnosis of initial caries lesions. Br Dent J.2012;213:551–7.
2.
BerryHMJr.Cervical burnout and Mach band: two shadows of doubt in radiologic interpretation of carious lesions. J Am Dent Assoc.1983;106:622–5.
3.
KiddEAM. Essential of Dental Caries. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. p 29.
4.
van BeekG.Dental Morphology: An illustrated Guide. 2nd ed. Bodmin: Wright; 1983. p 91–2.
